Started By
Message

Is Henry Kissinger's reason for Russian invasion of Ukraine wrong?

Posted on 9/28/22 at 11:05 am
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
119500 posts
Posted on 9/28/22 at 11:05 am
quote:

Mr. Kissinger courted controversy earlier this year by suggesting that incautious policies on the part of the U.S. and NATO may have touched off the crisis in Ukraine. He sees no choice but to take Vladimir Putin’s stated security concerns seriously and believes that it was a mistake for NATO to signal to Ukraine that it might eventually join the alliance: “I thought that Poland—all the traditional Western countries that have been part of Western history—were logical members of NATO,” he says. But Ukraine, in his view, is a collection of territories once appended to Russia, which Russians see as their own, even though “some Ukrainians” do not. Stability would be better served by its acting as a buffer between Russia and the West: “I was in favor of the full independence of Ukraine, but I thought its best role was something like Finland.”



Maybe the U.S. was a little too aggressive in their desire to expand NATO eastward into Ukraine, no?

LINK

Posted by Bestbank Tiger
Premium Member
Member since Jan 2005
71777 posts
Posted on 9/28/22 at 11:09 am to
Putin invading kind of validates Ukraine's concerns.

Simplest explanation is Putin wants to restore the Russian Empire.
Posted by LSUcdro
Republic of West Florida
Member since Sep 2009
11176 posts
Posted on 9/28/22 at 11:09 am to
follow the money
Posted by Indefatigable
Member since Jan 2019
27371 posts
Posted on 9/28/22 at 11:10 am to
quote:

Maybe the U.S. was a little too aggressive in their desire to expand NATO eastward

Yes! The US was soooooooo aggressive when Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Slovakia, Czech Republic, Hungary, Romania, and Bulgaria applied for membership to a defensive alliance.


Such aggression. We should have vetoed their membership applications, because we all know that Russia alone has the unilateral authority to dictate the foreign policy of every country that has ever been administered from Moscow.

I just cannot believe that the US was sooooo aggressive when those countries applied for membership. Pure, naked aggression.

quote:

Maybe the U.S. was a little too aggressive in their desire to expand NATO eastward into Ukraine, no?

Ukraine is and was nowhere close to becoming a NATO member. But, in any event, as stated previously, Russia gets to dictate what other countries do.
This post was edited on 9/28/22 at 11:11 am
Posted by La Place Mike
West Florida Republic
Member since Jan 2004
28901 posts
Posted on 9/28/22 at 11:12 am to
quote:

But Ukraine, in his view, is a collection of territories once appended to Russia, which Russians see as their own, even though “some Ukrainians” do not.


He is right. Russia and Ukraine have been in a struggle for centuries now. Lots of ethnic Russians all over Ukraine.
Posted by Zach
Gizmonic Institute
Member since May 2005
112776 posts
Posted on 9/28/22 at 11:13 am to
He's essentially correct. In military history the term was 'encirclement.' Nations become edgy when enemies increase territory around them. It's part of the reason behind The Monroe Doctrine.
In recent years NATO has been increasing their territory toward Russia.

Throughout history encirclement that is unopposed has resulted in the invasion of the encircled country.
Posted by N.O. via West-Cal
New Orleans
Member since Aug 2004
7184 posts
Posted on 9/28/22 at 11:16 am to
I suspect Kissinger is largely, if not entirely correct, but this in no way excuses Russia's barbarous invasion of a peaceful neighbor.
Posted by sta4ever
The Pit
Member since Aug 2014
15588 posts
Posted on 9/28/22 at 11:17 am to
quote:

Maybe the U.S. was a little too aggressive


Lol. I didn’t realize it was aggressive for countries to determine their own fate, and what alliances they choose…
Posted by dcbl
Good guys wear white hats.
Member since Sep 2013
29788 posts
Posted on 9/28/22 at 11:19 am to
quote:

Maybe the U.S. was a little too aggressive in their desire to expand NATO eastward into Ukraine, no?
ya think?
Posted by BlackPawnMartyr
Houston, TX
Member since Dec 2010
15361 posts
Posted on 9/28/22 at 11:32 am to
The hegemonic US banksters have now declared war in the average German citizen by attacking the pipeline. When the Germans suffer this winter hopefully they decide to overthrow the US puppets in Germany and force the US military out of Germany and retake their land, self determination, and economy.
Posted by Bunk Moreland
Member since Dec 2010
54308 posts
Posted on 9/28/22 at 11:45 am to
The current CIA director, a former CIA director, and several political analysts and academics have said for at least 20 years that Ukraine to NATO was a red line for Russia. Mearsheimer said in 2015 the west was leading Ukraine leading down a primrose path and they were going to get wrecked. But, hey, it's irrational Putin propaganda to discuss that.

None of that gets into the color revolution we backed and Ukraine's failure to recognize Minsk II and 14,000 dead in the Donbas since then.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
425823 posts
Posted on 9/28/22 at 11:47 am to
quote:

Maybe the U.S. was a little too aggressive in their desire to expand NATO eastward into Ukraine, no?

The problem is denying sovereign nations entry into a benign organization because of an insecure and irrational actor (who is just using this as a excuse anyway)
Posted by the_truman_shitshow
Member since Aug 2021
2755 posts
Posted on 9/28/22 at 11:54 am to
quote:

Maybe the U.S. was a little too aggressive in their desire to expand NATO eastward into Ukraine, no?


This is like pontificating on whether it was a good idea to have stabbed the bear with a sharp point after it has already bitten off your limbs.

It's pointless.
This post was edited on 9/28/22 at 11:55 am
Posted by crazy4lsu
Member since May 2005
36571 posts
Posted on 9/28/22 at 12:12 pm to
quote:

“I thought that Poland—all the traditional Western countries that have been part of Western history—were logical members of NATO,” he says. But Ukraine, in his view, is a collection of territories once appended to Russia, which Russians see as their own, even though “some Ukrainians” do not. Stability would be better served by its acting as a buffer between Russia and the West: “I was in favor of the full independence of Ukraine, but I thought its best role was something like Finland.”


What an insane reading of European history.

quote:

Maybe the U.S. was a little too aggressive in their desire to expand NATO eastward into Ukraine, no?



But it was Warsaw Pact countries that drove the expansion, starting in 1991.
Posted by FlySaint
FL Panhandle
Member since May 2018
1841 posts
Posted on 9/28/22 at 12:22 pm to
Putin agreed with Kissinger…he said numerous times that NATO expansion into Ukraine was unacceptable. (Trump agreed.)

Biden ignored this and signaled support for NATO expansion, provoking Putin.

Putin invades due to said provocation.

Biden/the liberal West: Unprovoked aggression, Reeeeee!

Putin: SMDH
Posted by Mid Iowa Tiger
Undisclosed Secure Location
Member since Feb 2008
18842 posts
Posted on 9/28/22 at 12:30 pm to
quote:

Maybe the U.S. was a little too aggressive in their desire to expand NATO eastward into Ukraine, no?


I said this early on. We had as a country given our word and then decided to ignore it. Actions have consequences. The radical left should have found a different money laundering locale.
Posted by LSUwag
Florida man
Member since Jan 2007
17321 posts
Posted on 9/28/22 at 12:37 pm to
I’ve said this all along.
Posted by doubleb
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2006
36534 posts
Posted on 9/28/22 at 12:37 pm to
Kissinger is overthinking this question.

Putin took over Georgia and Crimea and it had nothing to do eith NATO so why is Ukraine any different?
Posted by Ronaldo Burgundiaz
NWA
Member since Jan 2012
6588 posts
Posted on 9/28/22 at 1:15 pm to
NATO expansion is viewed by Russians as encirclement.

NATO expansion is actually about securing more military contracts for the American MIC.

People are dying in Ukraine over billion dollar contracts for military equipment.
This post was edited on 9/28/22 at 1:16 pm
Posted by AggieHank86
Texas
Member since Sep 2013
42941 posts
Posted on 9/28/22 at 1:18 pm to
quote:

I thought its best role was something like Finland.
What is Finland’s status?

“Joining NATO,” as I recall.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram