- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Is it normal for the DOJ to send out press releases like this?
Posted on 6/24/22 at 6:13 am
Posted on 6/24/22 at 6:13 am
Saying they disagree with SCOTUS's ruling and will ignore it. The DOJ is supposed to be a purely enforcement arm, and only job is to enforce the law. Not create their own subjective law. We are inching towards the precipice.
![](https://i.postimg.cc/C5GSgNCP/20220624-070938.jpg)
![](https://i.postimg.cc/C5GSgNCP/20220624-070938.jpg)
Posted on 6/24/22 at 6:14 am to burger bearcat
Never miss an opportunity to virtue signal
Posted on 6/24/22 at 6:18 am to burger bearcat
quote:
Saying they disagree with SCOTUS's ruling and will ignore it.
Democrats have been ignoring the courts and laws for many years now.
Posted on 6/24/22 at 6:19 am to burger bearcat
quote:
We are inching towards the precipice
![](https://gifrific.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/Dumb-and-Dumber-Were-There.gif)
Posted on 6/24/22 at 6:19 am to burger bearcat
Because Dems can ignore the Supreme Law of the land and do what they feel is just. But only them.
Posted on 6/24/22 at 6:20 am to burger bearcat
They're going to face oversight hearings in the next Congres and Garland could be pressed on whether or not he will enforce the ruling if necessary.
They (DOJ) could face funding issues in future legislation if the Republicans mounted a major effort to find their collective spine.
There are many things that can be done. I suspect very little will be done, outside of a handful of folks like Rand Paul in the Senate, Jim Jordan in the House.
They (DOJ) could face funding issues in future legislation if the Republicans mounted a major effort to find their collective spine.
There are many things that can be done. I suspect very little will be done, outside of a handful of folks like Rand Paul in the Senate, Jim Jordan in the House.
Posted on 6/24/22 at 6:21 am to burger bearcat
Obama accelerated selective enforcement or flat out ignoring laws from DOMA to immigration and border control.
The momentum of that trend has continued and has not met much friction.
Laws don't matter as much as they used to.
The momentum of that trend has continued and has not met much friction.
Laws don't matter as much as they used to.
This post was edited on 6/24/22 at 6:29 am
Posted on 6/24/22 at 6:21 am to burger bearcat
The Democrat’s don’t give a frick about the Constitution, Checks and Balances, or the USSC. They only acknowledge them when they stand to benefit. If you can’t see that the Democrats (with a huge assist from their RINO brethren) have declared a war of coercion and intimidation against the American people, then you are being willfully ignorant.
Posted on 6/24/22 at 6:22 am to burger bearcat
Well, this answers the other thread about Social Security running out by 2035. We won't be a country by 2035.
Posted on 6/24/22 at 6:22 am to burger bearcat
The ruling isn’t even that big of a deal. It basically just means states have to have objective criteria for licensing someone if they have that requirement. They were back door denying peoples rights by having criteria nobody could meet.
Posted on 6/24/22 at 6:24 am to burger bearcat
This is a letter of resignation.
IF not - then it is open rebellion against the Constitution. - fire or impeach/ imprison.
IF not - then it is open rebellion against the Constitution. - fire or impeach/ imprison.
Posted on 6/24/22 at 6:27 am to burger bearcat
Obama was/is such a radical cancer to our founding principles.
Posted on 6/24/22 at 6:30 am to burger bearcat
The Justice Department ain’t blind, it’s the enforcement arm of the DNC. That’s not conjecture, I judge them in what they do….
Posted on 6/24/22 at 6:40 am to burger bearcat
quote:
respectfully disagree
![](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/Images/icons/casty.gif)
If they were respectful, they'd shut their mouth.
What's humorous is their disagreement with themselves.
In the interest of safety, law-abiding citizens with desire to carry handguns must prove a special NEED to do so for self-defense ... amid "the epidemic of gun violence plaguing our communities" wrought by criminals who carry guns at will.
Posted on 6/24/22 at 6:45 am to burger bearcat
Reeks of hubris to me .
Edit : And is a great example why we DO need a 2nd A…federal government getting way to big for its britches.
Edit : And is a great example why we DO need a 2nd A…federal government getting way to big for its britches.
This post was edited on 6/24/22 at 6:49 am
Posted on 6/24/22 at 6:49 am to burger bearcat
We also disagree with the courts decision about “no standing” for election fraud regarding the TX law suite.
Posted on 6/24/22 at 6:49 am to burger bearcat
Trust the gov to stand outside and do absolutely nothing while bad guys are murdering defensless children.
Posted on 6/24/22 at 7:23 am to burger bearcat
Obama showed them all the way . What made this country great and work for so long was everyone respected all the institutions put into place . Now it means nothing they do what they want because they know NO ONE will stand up to them.
Posted on 6/24/22 at 7:26 am to burger bearcat
That's going to look good in the impeachment. About to learn the difference between a bureaucrat and an elected official in a constitutional republic.
Posted on 6/24/22 at 7:35 am to burger bearcat
quote:.
Is it normal for the DOJ to send out press releases like this?
Saying they disagree with SCOTUS's ruling
Not uncommon.
quote:
and will ignore it.
Don’t see this in the press release.
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)