- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Sony Refuses to Remove Statue of Liberty, Spider-Man Possibly Banned in China
Posted on 5/4/22 at 9:36 pm
Posted on 5/4/22 at 9:36 pm
Sony Refuses to Censor Statue of Liberty in Spider-Man No Way Home for China
Article points out Sony also refused to censor a previous film in China.
Does Disney get any share in overseas box office? Doesn't seem like they get any say in the editing of the film for China.
quote:
Apparently, China’s censors asked the Japanese entertainment giant if it could cut Lady Liberty from the film’s ending, but was rebuffed given the prominence the statue plays in the film’s climax, in which the three spidermen swing around one of the world’s most identifiable markers of freedom whilst battling supervillians.
Article points out Sony also refused to censor a previous film in China.
quote:
And it isn’t the first time Sony has stood up against China’s censors; when Beijing asked director Quentin Tarantino to omit Bruce Lee’s portrayal from “Once Upon A Time in Hollywood,” and he refused, Sony backed him. China canceled the movie’s release.
Does Disney get any share in overseas box office? Doesn't seem like they get any say in the editing of the film for China.
Posted on 5/4/22 at 9:42 pm to ThoseGuys
They want to censor it because it stands for freedom. Obviously China doesn’t care for that.
But the Statute of Liberty is such a popular American icon that has been so many other movies and has likely been seen by many Chinese people already. This includes the many Chinese tourists that go to NYC every year. So it makes no sense to want to remove something plenty of Chinese have already know exits. China makes little sense
But the Statute of Liberty is such a popular American icon that has been so many other movies and has likely been seen by many Chinese people already. This includes the many Chinese tourists that go to NYC every year. So it makes no sense to want to remove something plenty of Chinese have already know exits. China makes little sense
This post was edited on 5/4/22 at 9:43 pm
Posted on 5/4/22 at 9:58 pm to ThoseGuys
One of my earliest movie memories. GBII must be banned in China.
This post was edited on 5/4/22 at 10:18 pm
Posted on 5/4/22 at 10:12 pm to ThoseGuys
Isn't Sony based in Japan?
Posted on 5/4/22 at 11:00 pm to ThoseGuys
Theyre all mad that our cocks are bigger
Posted on 5/4/22 at 11:19 pm to ThoseGuys
Hmm? A Japanese corporation not on the side of China?
Who would've thought?
Who would've thought?
Posted on 5/4/22 at 11:34 pm to ThoseGuys
quote:
to omit Bruce Lee’s portrayal from “Once Upon A Time in Hollywood,” and he refused, Sony backed him. China canceled the movie’s release.
How fricking petty and ridiculous is this?
How emotionally fragile is the self-image of an average Chinese moviegoer that the government feels the need to protect them against any portrayal of Chinese people that doesn't involve them slaying Dragons and saving the world?
But then again they banned the YouTube videos of that Chinese MMA fighter who challenged Kung Fu masters who practiced Wing Chun and even Tai Chi and beat the crap out them to show it was "it terms of a pure effective fighting discipline" total bullshite.
Posted on 5/5/22 at 12:42 am to ThoseGuys
Oooooo. Disney not gonna like this…
Posted on 5/5/22 at 1:11 am to ThoseGuys
I don't think Sony is taking any kind of a stand here. It's just not really feasible to redo the last 30 minutes of their movie, which had to be the most expensive part of the movie to make.
This post was edited on 5/5/22 at 1:14 am
Posted on 5/5/22 at 3:13 am to ThoseGuys
Their dicks are so small it’s so sad
Posted on 5/5/22 at 5:20 am to ThoseGuys
I'm a bit surprised. Pleasantly.
Posted on 5/5/22 at 7:41 am to ThoseGuys
Perhaps the pendulum's momentum has shifted? Interdasting...
Posted on 5/5/22 at 7:49 am to ThoseGuys
Sony is the good guy in Hollywood.
Remember they were also pressured to not release "The Interview" and did anyway, which caused the huge hack.
No fricks given, it's good to see that in that industry.
Sony
Remember they were also pressured to not release "The Interview" and did anyway, which caused the huge hack.
No fricks given, it's good to see that in that industry.
Sony
This post was edited on 5/5/22 at 7:51 am
Posted on 5/5/22 at 8:19 am to ThoseGuys
quote:
Apparently, China’s censors asked the Japanese entertainment giant if it could cut Lady Liberty from the film’s ending
I mean, even *IF* you were willing to do so, it would require SO much editing to change every scene it appears in.
The statue is an iconic part of NYC. Spider-Man is an iconic character who directly linked to NYC, more so than pretty much any other superhero; hell, I can't think of another fictional character so integrated into a real-life location (though I admit I'm not terribly versed on characters in other countries).
The part about Bruce Lee appears to be not even close to the full story though. It seems Lee's daughter filed a complaint with the Chinese Film Authorities because of how her father was portrayed.
quote:
Shannon Lee, who runs the official Bruce Lee businesses and foundation, reportedly lodged a complaint with the Chinese film authorities demanding two scenes in which her late father is portrayed in a confrontation with Pitt’s stuntman character be excised, because they made the iconic Kung Fu star look arrogant.
That had some Hollywood insiders shaking their heads.
“The scenes weren’t particularly provocative,” says an industry exec who has worked with Tarantino. “He’s portrayed as being confident. This is art. It was never a literal biography.”
“Tarantino worships Bruce Lee,” adds the exec. “He has homages to him in many of his films. He’s was just showing him as a confident guy. Is that the kind of thing that ought to ban a movie in an entire country? I don’t think so.”
“I think (Tarantino) feels bad that people feel bad,” says the exec. “That wasn’t his intention. But its hard. You can’t do only what fans want. Otherwise there is no originality left. It would make really boring movies.”
Shannon calls it her mission to keep alive the memory of her father, not just as a movie star and martial artist but also a philosopher. She sees this as part of her effort to defend that legacy, especially after Tarantino failed to consult with her during script writing and production.
“I have dedicated myself to keeping my father’s energy alive,” Shannon writes on Brucelee.com, “ because his words and the way he lived his life have had a profound effect on me and my personal growth.”
Others see a profit motive as well. The chatter on Chinese social media is that Shannon is making a deal with Chinese officials to make their own Bruce Lee movie, which might explain her increased clout.
The full story of the quote can be found here:
The Real Reason Once Upon A Time in Hollywood was banned in China
Posted on 5/5/22 at 8:29 am to ThoseGuys
It's a little late in the game to keep Lady Liberty a secret, wouldn't y'all agree?
Posted on 5/5/22 at 8:29 am to ThoseGuys
Disney's meeting with Sony later today
Posted on 5/5/22 at 8:37 am to ThoseGuys
People sure have spent a lot of time and energy on statues over the last ten years or so. First America, now China. I never saw it coming.
Posted on 5/5/22 at 10:32 am to ThoseGuys
Looks like I'll buy a physical copy of a movie for once. Stuff like this should be supported.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News