Started By
Message

re: I don’t get why it is more costly for colleges to educate students now vs the 70s/80s

Posted on 4/30/22 at 5:08 pm to
Posted by Volvagia
Fort Worth
Member since Mar 2006
52063 posts
Posted on 4/30/22 at 5:08 pm to
While bloated admin is a part, one of the biggest drivers is that states raided their portion of the university budget either through nesscessity due to being prohibited at making cuts elsewhere, or to just outright free up money for their pet projects.

It was felt politically viable to do this because of how cheap government made getting loans.

As a result of a reduction of state funding, universities increases tuition and fees.

You’ll find that most private schools had far lower tuition growth because of not being subject to withdrawal of funding.
Posted by McVick
Member since Jan 2011
4502 posts
Posted on 4/30/22 at 5:46 pm to
quote:

Is it also due professor salary/lecturer salary increases?


While there may be more faculty and instruction than say twenty years ago wages have not increased at the same rate as administration costs. If anything colleges are finding more ways to stretch or reduce faculty and instruction costs. Faculty retirements replaced with adjuncts and instructors, with VAPs positions used to fill gaps without losing talent. Or just flat out sit on open tenure-track lines for as long as possible before needing to approve advancing the hiring process.

Faculty, especially untenured assistant professors and lower, make so much less that you think they do.

Posted by Stealth Matrix
29°59'55.98"N 90°05'21.85"W
Member since Aug 2019
8510 posts
Posted on 4/30/22 at 6:03 pm to
quote:

What changed?

Handing out tenure like candy, for starts
Posted by stelly1025
Lafayette
Member since May 2012
8811 posts
Posted on 4/30/22 at 6:10 pm to
When student loans were taken over by the government what the hell did people think would happen? You think a private lender would give someone 150K for a gender studies or sociology degree? Yeah right, no private lender in their right mind would put that kind of money on the table for a bullshite degree. When Government took over student loans universities realized they could charge through the nose for even useless degree programs. As a university why wouldn't you then put as many kids in even if they are not college material in classes? They will get their money regardless. It is a big scam all of it. Sadly, stupid sons of bitches like you voted for the guy who is going to try and forgive some or much of that debt that some people with useless degrees hold. So on behalf of America frick you you fricking frick.
This post was edited on 4/30/22 at 6:14 pm
Posted by kywildcatfanone
Wildcat Country!
Member since Oct 2012
122529 posts
Posted on 4/30/22 at 6:14 pm to
Swe university diversity thread
Posted by c on z
Zamunda
Member since Mar 2009
128032 posts
Posted on 4/30/22 at 6:20 pm to
Pretty sure that disinvestment in higher education began around that time (primarily due to the recession). Many people used to go to non-private colleges on the cheap back then when the states funded them to where it wouldn’t be so expensive.
Posted by Turf Taint
New Orleans
Member since Jun 2021
6010 posts
Posted on 4/30/22 at 6:34 pm to
Missed economics class, aye?
Hope you did not miss English for the irony.
Posted by Dawgfanman
Member since Jun 2015
24167 posts
Posted on 4/30/22 at 6:38 pm to
College tuition and fees are higher for many reasons:

- decrease in state appropriations to schools, essentially shifting from tax payer funded to user funded

- increase in amenities, from workout/sports facilities to information technology to nicer housing

- increased access to student loans

-increased demand for college educations

-bloated admin

Posted by Taxing Authority
Houston
Member since Feb 2010
58294 posts
Posted on 4/30/22 at 7:16 pm to
quote:

I don’t get why it is more costly for colleges to educate students now vs the 70s/80s
You seem to have confused cost and price.
Posted by lsuconnman
Baton rouge
Member since Feb 2007
2956 posts
Posted on 4/30/22 at 7:20 pm to
quote:

I don’t get why it is more costly for colleges to educate students now vs the 70s/80s


Have you ever seen a university 40 years ago? No Rec center with lazy rivers. Share a room with 3 three people, and the whole floor shares a bathroom. No cafeteria on the weekend.
Posted by lostinbr
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Oct 2017
10452 posts
Posted on 4/30/22 at 8:01 pm to
quote:

Explain to me why a school like LSU could give a 1970s student a 4 year education/degree at 4 times less the cost as a 2022 student

I don’t have data for the 70’s, but I found data going back to the 90’s on revenue by source at LSU.

The unrestricted revenue, which is the general fund that includes tuition and state funding, was..

Unrestricted Revenue:
1994 - $211,720,580
2019 - $566,408,526

Here’s what that looks like in 2019 dollars, once you adjust for inflation.

Unrestricted Revenue (2019 Dollars):
1994 - $365,235,143
2019 - $566,408,526

Still looks like the school is spending a lot more money. But full-time enrollment was 19,703 in 1994. Full-time enrollment was 27,225 in 2019.

Unrestricted Revenue per Full-Time Student (2019 Dollars):
1994 - $18,537
2019 - $20,805

That still doesn’t tell the entire story for a couple of reasons:
- Part-time enrollment was also higher in 2019
- Inflation adjustment via CPI doesn’t do a great job of capturing increases in technology costs.

That being said, I think this is close enough to get the point across. Funding per student has increased, but nowhere near as much as tuition. Which brings me to the next point..

Unrestricted Revenue per Full-Time Student, by Source (2019 Dollars):

1994 Tuition & Fees - $6,417
1994 State Appropriations - $10,668
1994 Other - $1,452

2019 Tuition & Fees - $15,121
2019 State Appropriations - $5,162
2019 Other - $522

(Note that this is not intended to represent the exact full-time tuition rate. It’s just the total revenue divided by the number of full-time students. Actual full-time tuition should be lower on average because of part-time students.)

In 1994 tuition and fees made up 35% of the unrestricted budget while state appropriations made up 58%. In 2019, tuition and fees made up 73% of the unrestricted budget while state appropriations made up 25%.

State appropriations in 2021 were less than half of what they were in 1994, when adjusted for inflation.

So the gist of it is - yeah, the university’s inflation-adjusted operating cost per full-time student increased by $2,268 from 1994 to 2019. Meanwhile, state funding decreased by $5,506 per full time student over the same time period.

It’s certainly fair to look at the increase in operating costs and question whether the university is being efficient. But if you’re asking why tuition has increased, the #1 reason is that the costs have been shifted from tax dollars to tuition dollars.

I don’t expect that everyone will look at this as a bad thing, as many may feel that the students/families should bear the brunt of the cost. That’s a perfectly valid opinion. The numbers only tell part of the story when you have the TOPS elephant in the room, as well. I’m just trying to point out the reality of why tuition costs have increased so much.
Posted by choupiquesushi
yaton rouge
Member since Jun 2006
31255 posts
Posted on 4/30/22 at 8:25 pm to
Dorms with lazy rivers
Posted by Tiger in NY
Neptune Beach, FL
Member since Sep 2003
30569 posts
Posted on 4/30/22 at 8:29 pm to
Government subsidized loans.
Posted by TutHillTiger
Mississippi Alabama
Member since Sep 2010
43700 posts
Posted on 4/30/22 at 9:24 pm to
Administration abs facility cost is the correct answer, they actually pay professors less and use tons of adjunct facility.
Posted by Bard
Definitely NOT an admin
Member since Oct 2008
52873 posts
Posted on 4/30/22 at 9:49 pm to
When you allow nearly unlimited government funds into a business, management expands.

Lazy rivers, apartment-style dorms, Office of Diversity, Equity & Inclusion, etc. These extras that schools have now don't get paid for with wishful thinking. Hell, here's $400k-$500k per year being spent now which wasn't deemed as necessary until the last twenty years or so.

Here's just the top level org chart for LSU: LINK It would be interesting to see how different the one from 1970 or 1980 looked. I imagine there wouldn't be quite as many positions. If you were to drill down, I imagine you would see even larger discrepancies between the amount of non-teaching employees now versus then.

Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
265946 posts
Posted on 5/1/22 at 7:40 am to
Go look at the administrative costs. Too many programs, too many employees and watered down education.


Public education at the post secondary level is just a federal money grab.
Posted by NPComb
Member since Jan 2019
27588 posts
Posted on 5/1/22 at 7:48 am to
If there were no government backing the supposed student loan crisis would not even be an issue. Why get a college degree that you can't pay off?

Better yet, why should my money be used to pay for your poor choice in msjors?
Posted by shawnlsu
Member since Nov 2011
23682 posts
Posted on 5/1/22 at 8:40 am to
Bloated and overpaid admin depaetments at every single college along with "tenured professors".
All making bank on brainwashing our youth.
College is the biggest scam pulled on our country in the last 50 years. They convinced us that you wouldn't amount to anything in life without a degree. All they did was turn higher learning into a cult that produces mindless drones.
This post was edited on 5/1/22 at 8:44 am
Posted by Capital Cajun
Over Yonder
Member since Aug 2007
5544 posts
Posted on 5/1/22 at 8:45 am to
The administration’s have grown exponentially.


There was a breakdown of the cost at Ohio State diversity and inclusion and I think it was 30 million a year.
Posted by LT
The City of St. George
Member since May 2008
5152 posts
Posted on 5/1/22 at 10:45 am to
The cost is the same... the value of the money used to pay for said education is not the same...
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram