Started By
Message

re: If Riley says no so late that we lose Aranda, would that be considered a huge fail?

Posted on 11/18/21 at 1:11 pm to
Posted by SlidellCajun
Slidell la
Member since May 2019
10577 posts
Posted on 11/18/21 at 1:11 pm to
If we don’t get one of the top candidates then it’s a fail

We put the cart before the horse.

I think it would also spell the end of Woodward as he’d likely become disenchanted with LSU
This post was edited on 11/18/21 at 1:51 pm
Posted by Goldrush25
San Diego, CA
Member since Oct 2012
33794 posts
Posted on 11/18/21 at 1:11 pm to
That's always been the risk, though now that he's practically out of the NC picture it's much less of a risk than waiting until January (which would've been absurd).

The earliest Riley could put pen to paper is after the Big 12 championship game.

But people said he was worth the risk, this is the risk, most of your other viable candidates may find their musical chairs before Riley turns us down. Can't say he's worth the risk then call it a fail if it doesn't happen.
This post was edited on 11/18/21 at 1:13 pm
Posted by UpToPar
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2008
22213 posts
Posted on 11/18/21 at 1:13 pm to
quote:

How is Aranda a bigger risk than Napier?


Because Napier has shown consistency and the ability to recruit. He's about to put together his third consecutive 10 win season at ULL.

I like what Aranda is doing, but whether he can maintain those types of results is yet to be seen, and his recruiting ability is a HUGE question mark.

Aranda is a great DC, but we've seen plenty of great coordinators make very poor head coaches.

Napier has a much larger sample size as a HC and has shown consistency over that sample size.
Posted by Byron Bojangles III
Member since Nov 2012
51839 posts
Posted on 11/18/21 at 1:15 pm to
Thanks for the recap
Posted by GroundPati
Winchester Tn
Member since Jan 2021
383 posts
Posted on 11/18/21 at 1:16 pm to
hmm
Posted by 1999
Where I be
Member since Oct 2009
29221 posts
Posted on 11/18/21 at 1:16 pm to
problem with napier is that he is gonna be in demand for other jobs.
Posted by koLSU86
Member since Aug 2012
3472 posts
Posted on 11/18/21 at 1:19 pm to
quote:

Aranda is a great DC, but we've seen plenty of great coordinators make very poor head coaches. Napier has a much larger sample size as a HC and has shown consistency over that sample size.


I agree he has a larger sample size, but we’ve also seen successful group of 5 coaches completely tank when they get their big job as well. I’d rather have a proven commodity on defense than a guy who is a risk and can’t show anything impressive on the side of the ball he’s known for.
Posted by oleheat
Sportsman's Paradise
Member since Mar 2007
13545 posts
Posted on 11/18/21 at 1:19 pm to
We won't know for about 5 years.
Posted by GeauxTigers0107
South Louisiana
Member since Oct 2009
9805 posts
Posted on 11/18/21 at 1:21 pm to
quote:

would that be considered a huge fail?


I'm saying no, it wouldn't. This shite is super fluid man. Add the timing issues into it, coaches still coaching, might make the playoffs, out of the playoffs, current school offering raises and extensions...it's so many moving parts and Scott Woodward basically has to get lucky for this shite to work out for us. All he can do is put his biggest and best offer out there to the guy he really wants and I think we'd all agree that he's done that. He's basically at Riley's mercy now and that's gotta suck.

So I don't think it's a fail if Riley says no and Aranda accepts USC. The only way he fails is if he doesn't put his best foot forward for his favorite candidate.
Posted by togar tiger
Member since Jan 2008
705 posts
Posted on 11/18/21 at 1:22 pm to
Really hoping that Campbell is still in the mix if Riley says no. Campbell, Aranda, Napier - that’s a pretty nice set of options as plan B
Posted by ehidal1
Chief Boot Knocka
Member since Dec 2007
37141 posts
Posted on 11/18/21 at 1:24 pm to
Thanks
Posted by UpToPar
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2008
22213 posts
Posted on 11/18/21 at 1:27 pm to
quote:

but we’ve also seen successful group of 5 coaches completely tank when they get their big job as well.


Right, which is why I said both are risks.

quote:

I’d rather have a proven commodity on defense than a guy who is a risk and can’t show anything impressive on the side of the ball he’s known for.


Baylor is ranked 46th in total defense this year.
ULL is ranked 47th in total offense.
Posted by Moustache
GEAUX TIGERS
Member since May 2008
21557 posts
Posted on 11/18/21 at 1:27 pm to
Why are these the only two choices? Aranda’s defense was never like a Kirby smart elite d. It was good. We would have a hard time finding an OC.


What happened to guys like Brian Kelly, rhule, urban, Gundy, Campbell, etc?

Sounds like you baws are panicking because of our past. Literally nobody names a new coach before the end of the season.
Posted by PoppaD
Texas
Member since Feb 2008
4973 posts
Posted on 11/18/21 at 1:28 pm to
quote:

problem with napier is that he is gonna be in demand for other jobs.


If Napier feels he has a chance to get the LSU job, he will make TCU or anybody else wait. Don't forget agents are doing of lots of talking behind the scenes. I bet they have a good feel for how things are trending and whether there guy should wait around a little bit longer.
Posted by TDTiger225
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2019
1452 posts
Posted on 11/18/21 at 1:30 pm to
quote:

I have Aranda above Napier on my wish list, but both are big risk, with Aranda being the bigger risk.
That's just dumb. Risk is related to floor not ceiling. Given his current body of work Aranda has one of the highest floors of anyone.
Posted by 0
Member since Aug 2011
16663 posts
Posted on 11/18/21 at 1:31 pm to
quote:

Message
If Riley says no so late that we lose Aranda, would that be considered a huge fail?


If Aranda was Woodys #2 then absolutely.
Posted by hashtag
Comfy, AF
Member since Aug 2005
27736 posts
Posted on 11/18/21 at 1:31 pm to
quote:

SlowFlowPro
you have become such a vag as an actual adult.
Posted by ipodking
#StopTalkingAboutWomensSports
Member since Jun 2008
56324 posts
Posted on 11/18/21 at 1:32 pm to
Yall need to get off Aranda’s nuts

There’s a huge drop off in coaching talent and skins on the wall from Riley to Aranda
This post was edited on 11/18/21 at 1:34 pm
Posted by moneyg
Member since Jun 2006
56871 posts
Posted on 11/18/21 at 1:39 pm to
quote:

I have Riley as 1 and Aranda as 2 and I think that should be everyone's 1/2 these days, but there is a lot of smoke that Aranda and USC have mutual interest. I don't know if our window is very open for Aranda, and it appears Riley is dragging this out. If he does this on purpose and Woodward allows himself to be left hanging much longer, we're going to likely lose whatever shot we have left at Aranda.


What would you do?

Would you discard Riley right now assuming you could sign Aranda?

If not now, when?

You won’t have perfect information. So, when would you give up on your #1 to get your #2?
Posted by Earnest_P
Member since Aug 2021
3587 posts
Posted on 11/18/21 at 1:40 pm to
I think it’s a mistake to go after the likes of Jimbo, Riley, Dabo, etc.
I don’t think any of the true top coaches, those considered “proven” winners at a top program, want to leave one top program to go to another.
They’re already making a ton of money, and besides the money, the downside of jumping programs is bigger than the likely upside.

If you come to LSU and do anything less than win championships, at a superficial level, you look worse than Miles and Orgeron.

Maybe the only thing worse than following a legend is following a buffoon who won a national championship.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram