- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
AU Beat Writer claims CWM is being offered full control of the defense..
Posted on 12/11/14 at 11:39 am
Posted on 12/11/14 at 11:39 am
Meaning Muschamp has full control over all decisions concerning the defensive side of the ball from recruiting to in-game decisions and can't be overturned by Malzahn. Basically, it sounds like they're saying Muschamp is being offered Defensive Head Coach.
This is all from Jay G. Tate. Can't see how Malzahn would be cool with that nor do I see how that dynamic is a good recipe for success. Maybe I'm wrong.
This is all from Jay G. Tate. Can't see how Malzahn would be cool with that nor do I see how that dynamic is a good recipe for success. Maybe I'm wrong.
This post was edited on 12/11/14 at 11:41 am
19
Posted on 12/11/14 at 11:41 am to FairhopeTider
Do you remember when Joe Pendry was Head Offensive Coach for yall?
Posted on 12/11/14 at 11:42 am to FairhopeTider
quote:
FairhopeTider
quote:
I'm wrong.
Posted on 12/11/14 at 11:42 am to DyeHardDylan
so basically same position as chief at LSU.
but not the same position that smart has at alabama!
but not the same position that smart has at alabama!
Posted on 12/11/14 at 11:44 am to DyeHardDylan
I don't recall Pendry having full veto power over Saban on all offensive decisions.
Again, I'm not arguing that Muschamp would fail at AU. I just don't see Gus giving him that kind of power. Gus is a solid head coach and shouldn't have to give up complete control of half his team.
Again, I'm not arguing that Muschamp would fail at AU. I just don't see Gus giving him that kind of power. Gus is a solid head coach and shouldn't have to give up complete control of half his team.
This post was edited on 12/11/14 at 11:48 am
Posted on 12/11/14 at 11:45 am to FairhopeTider
What has Malzahn done to show he gives a frick what happens on the the defensive side?
Posted on 12/11/14 at 11:48 am to TheDrunkenTigah
I believe the longer he takes to decide, the more likely it is that he will join his best friend Jimbo Fisher at FSU. Most of the Tribe are not happy with their defense.
Posted on 12/11/14 at 11:49 am to FairhopeTider
It's basically what every offensive minded coach does. He pretty much did it with Ellis Johnson.
Chizik meddled in the shite he wasn't good at and it cost him. Malzahn isn't a defensive guy so why not defer to somebody that is?
Chizik meddled in the shite he wasn't good at and it cost him. Malzahn isn't a defensive guy so why not defer to somebody that is?
Posted on 12/11/14 at 11:51 am to FairhopeTider
quote:
CWM
Posted on 12/11/14 at 11:52 am to LSUDonMCO
quote:are they really close friends?
join his best friend Jimbo Fisher at FSU
Posted on 12/11/14 at 11:52 am to Weagle25
quote:
Chizik meddled in the shite he wasn't good at and it cost him. Malzahn isn't a defensive guy so why not defer to somebody that is?
I completely agree. I just don't think Muschamp would have full veto power if he ends up at AU. I don't think any DC should have that over a HC.
Posted on 12/11/14 at 11:55 am to FairhopeTider
So 2 head coaches for Auburn. What could go wrong?
Posted on 12/11/14 at 11:56 am to Chicken
Their families shared a lake house in Florida at some point.
Posted on 12/11/14 at 12:01 pm to FairhopeTider
quote:
Meaning Muschamp has full control over all decisions concerning the defensive side of the ball from recruiting to in-game decisions and can't be overturned by Malzahn.
Yeah, okay.
Posted on 12/11/14 at 12:01 pm to FairhopeTider
quote:
Muschamp has full control over all decisions concerning the defensive side of the ball
Is it odd that I though that was the role of a DC?
Posted on 12/11/14 at 12:02 pm to FairhopeTider
Gus is an accomplished enough coach, he doesn't need to be giving ultimate authority to ANYONE on HIS staff. Especially someone that was an utter failure at being a HC.
Posted on 12/11/14 at 12:03 pm to FairhopeTider
isn't this rhetorical though?
that's why offensive HC's should stay out of defensive gameplanning and vice versa...at least IMO.
that's why offensive HC's should stay out of defensive gameplanning and vice versa...at least IMO.
Posted on 12/11/14 at 12:05 pm to bamarep
quote:
he doesn't need to be giving ultimate authority to ANYONE on HIS staff.
Gus just wants to sit around and do mickey mouse offense things with his friends. He doesn't want to deal with the defense bro
Posted on 12/11/14 at 12:11 pm to piggidyphish
quote:
Is it odd that I though that was the role of a DC?
It's odd for the HC not to have veto power over recruiting decisions on either side of the ball.
But all of that is coming from from Jay Tate, so I'd take all of it with a huge grain of salt. I don't see a HC out there not having veto power over the DC for anything, especially recruiting.
Posted on 12/11/14 at 12:11 pm to FairhopeTider
Ellis basically had the same power, but word is Gus had to step in after the LSU game this year due to conflict.
Page 1 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News