Favorite team:Alabama 
Location:
Biography:
Interests:
Occupation:
Number of Posts:16137
Registered on:1/22/2013
Online Status:Not Online

Recent Posts

Message
Again, the filibuster will be killed. It's not a matter of if, but when. The 2020 election cycle proved to the dems what they can do if they are able to game the election laws in their favor, and they will do it the very next chance they get. Schumer and the dems leadership have already outright said they will. It has been whittled down to a sliver of what it was by both parties already.

Now I don't like that fact. The filibuster is the only thing that kept the dems from destroying our voting system for this last election cycle. But the cold hard fact is that the filibuster is already all but dead. It's just a matter of time, and anyone that is still holding onto the hope that it isn't going to be killed is fooling themselves.
quote:

Those weren't just temporary suspensions?

No the filibuster has been fully killed for those type of appointments.
quote:

They could, but they would need 2/3 of the vote to do it because of, you know, the threat of a filibuster.

You only need 51 to kill the filibuster. That is how Harry Reid killed the filibuster for Presidential appointees and judges (outside of SCOTUS appointments), and Turtle killed the Filibuster for SCOTUS appointees.
For anyone that is questioning the dems goal for the filibuster once they regain control, here is Schumer's own words on what they are planning on doing.

quote:

Voicing confidence that Vice President Kamala Harris and Democrats will win the election, Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer said he’s eyeing changes to the 60-vote filibuster rule to pass a pair of major bills that would expand voting rights nationwide.


quote:

“We got it up to 48, but, of course, Sinema and Manchin voted no; that’s why we couldn’t change the rules. Well, they’re both gone,” Schumer told reporters here Tuesday during the week of the Democratic convention. “Ruben Gallego is for it, and we have 51. So even losing Manchin, we still have 50.”


quote:

At a separate Politico event Monday, Schumer specified that the two bills he’d try to pass under the rule change are the Freedom to Vote Act and the John Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act. He predicted there will be “consensus in my caucus to try and do that,” calling the two measures “very, very important.”


Link to article

Anyone that believes that the dems aren't going to kill the filibuster the first chance they get are not paying attention to what they have already said and tried. They will kill the filibuster, and enact voting legislation that will cripple the GOP's chances of ever winning another federal election for the foreseeable future. And then they will drive this country into true authoritarian socialism/communism through legislation.
quote:

But they should threaten to remove the filibuster just to get the Dems on record saying removing the filibuster is a threat to their “DEMOCRACY”.

It wouldn't matter if they got the dems to say removing the filibuster would destroy "democracy". Once the dems gain control of the Senate, House, and Presidency they will 100% kill the filibuster and enact any and all legislation that they can dream up, starting with legislation focused on election reform. The dem leadership stated EXACTLY that leading up to this last election cycle. Also there is a reason that Sinema and Manchin refused to run for reelection, and the main one is because of all of the flack they received from the dems for standing in the way of it during their last term.

So make no mistake, the filibuster will be eliminated in our lifetime, but it'll be the dems that do it, and they will strike first to rig all future election rules to their favor. That is a fact. It's just a matter of time.
quote:

I think this is ultimately what he's going to want to do.

It's probably what he's going to have to do, especially if Kevin either gets taken out or turns on Harry (Kevin's wife will probably also be another issue for Kevin and Harry's relationship). But I think at this point in the story Harry is hoping that him & Kevin can salvage the empire. Again though, it probably won't work out like that for Harry, and he'll have to burn it all down.

re: Mobland - Paramount+ (now w spoilers)

Posted by Bamatab on 5/27/25 at 12:38 pm
quote:

Just starting to think this is all a giant head fake and he ends up sticking with Conrad and not looking for an escape hatch,

I just wouldn't understand that line of thinking for his character, especially after the way that the show has made it clear that Harry can clearly see that Conrad and Maeve are destroying everything around them and are both BSC. I get that Harry is loyal, but you can't be loyal to someone who is imploding the way that Conrad is, especially when he knows that his wife and daughter are in Conrad's (and Maeve's) crosshairs.

I think that he let the narc go because it's an easy out for him if the cops can pin a murder on Conrad, and with Conrad out of the way Harry would have Kevin & Seraphina on his side to help combat Maeve's crazy a$$ if she gets out of jail. And with Conrad out of the way, Harry probably feels like he could essentially run the whole Harrigan empire with Kevin being basically the figure head leader. A potential roadblock would be if Seraphina gets weary of Harry, and tries to get in-between Harry and Kevin. I guess another roadblock would be if Kevin goes down for killing the rapist guy. But I think the endgame of this is either Harry takes control of the Harrigan emipre, or burns it down so that he and his family can get out.

re: Kate, Ziva, Eleanor, or Jessica

Posted by Bamatab on 5/1/25 at 12:09 pm
Katrina Law (Jessica) has some pretty steamy scenes (full frontal at that) in Spartacus. She had a nice body, at least back then she did, and she seems to have aged pretty well.

re: Thoughts on Sinners (Spoilers)

Posted by Bamatab on 4/24/25 at 1:52 pm
quote:

Spit porn is going to skyrocket after people see her in this movie


I saw where Josh Allen is taking some heat for Hailee's sex scenes. Are the scenes "steamy" enough to justify Josh taking heat on?
Yeah, I always thought that was a dangerous move putting her seat at risk considering the narrow margin in the House. Even though she won her seat by a pretty decent margin, I just wouldn't trust that the NY dems wouldn't pull some shady crap to try to steal that seat and heaven forbid if the dems somehow pull one of the FL House races.
quote:

He isn't exactly MAGA, but better than a dem.

Definitely not MAGA. It would be interesting to see if he'd be closer to Collins or to Thune when it comes to his voting. But either way, like you said, he would still be better than a dem.
I believe he best serves the people of Alabama as a Senator where he is one of the few truly "MAGA" Senators in the Senate.

I'm not sure how he would fare as the top executive of my state, but he has already proven how he fares as the senior Senator of my state.
quote:

He has to apologize, ask to be welcomed back to the Oval Office, announce that he's accepting a peace treaty as is, pull all Ukrainian troops back, agree to the minerals deal and wear a suit at his next scheduled meeting.

He needs to do all of this along with publicly outing who advised him to pull that stunt to begin with. There's no way he did that without assurances from someone.
Along with an actual apology (which this is not), he also needs to publicly out whoever advised/pushed him to confront Trump/Vance in the Oval Office. There is no way that Zelensky pulled that stunt unless he was given assurances that he would have cover from any backlash.

If that is indeed the case, then he needs to make public what those assurances were, and who gave them to him. Until he does that, along with giving a real apology to Trump/Vance, Trump should tell him to pound sand.
quote:

If we pull out, how screwed is Ukraine?
Do we think Europe really puts up crazy money to keep this going or will Ukraine fold and eventually become Russia?

Europe will put up a front like they will back Ukraine without US aid, but when push comes to shove they will force Zelensky to beg Trump for forgiveness and capitulate to whatever demands Trump gives for the peace treaty. Europe won't even put up money for their own defense, I would be shocked if they put up real money for Ukraine's defense
quote:

Fine. Do it with your own money and your own men, if there are any left in Europe who don't worship Allah.

Exactly. If Europe wants to back Zelensky with their own money and men, then fine by me. But the US better not send another single dollar to Ukraine unless Zelensky comes back with his tail between his legs, begging for Trump's forgiveness, and ready to capitulate to whatever terms Trump deems as necessary for a peace treaty.
quote:

Hasn't that fig been crying about getting more aid to Ukraine the last few years?

Screw that guy. South Carolina, do whatever you need to do to get rid of that a-hole.

Of course he has. That's why I said for Miss Lindsey to now be publicly bashing Zelensky like his is today, then that means that even Miss Lindsey knows that Zelensky f'ed up so bad that even Lindsey has to turn on him.
For Zelensky to think what he did was actually a good idea to do in the White House, to the sitting President and VP, and in front of the media...then I can't imagine how Zelensky talked to the previous administration behind closed doors. But he found out real fast that Trump and JD aren't the previous administration.

re: Reacher Season 3 Discussion

Posted by Bamatab on 2/28/25 at 1:15 pm
quote:

The villain McCabe/Quinn knows who Reacher is. The moment Beck announced him his boss would’ve had Reacher killed especially after Duke was eliminated and Beck claimed Angel was part of the kidnapping attempt.

Yeah, there's no was that Quinn doesn't know who Reacher is. Reacher's name was on his uniform when he caught/tried to kill Quinn. And there's no way that Quinn doesn't know the name of the guy that replaced the kid's keeper, much less the guy that took the #2 spot after Duke was killed.

Now they did go out of their way to give Quinn's juvey record that basically stated that he was a psychopath with the animal torture and whatnot, so I guess it may be possible that Quinn is willing to sacrifice Duke, Angel, and the kid's keeper if it was part of his plan to get revenge on Reacher. But I would think that for this all to be part of Quinn's master plan, the plan would've had to been made by Quinn from the jump, before Reacher even infiltrated the group, and not a spur of the moment thing that Quinn decided after Reacher's prints were ran. There just wasn't a whole lot of time to consider all of it from the time that Reacher's prints were run until they gave Reacher the spot on the team after the Russian Roulette test at the barn. And that would mean that Quinn meant for Reacher to see him at the bus stop.

That also makes we wonder of Duffy is in on it since she is the one that is going out of her way to get Reacher onto the crew, and basically breaking laws to allow Reacher to continue his work on the case.