by
99 Comments
Matthew Emmons-USA TODAY Sports
Fox Sports College Football analyst joined "Sports Talk 790" radio in Houston this week and had some interesting comments about the final score in LSU's season opener win over Miami.

The Tigers led the Hurricanes 33-3 heading into the 4th quarter but gave up two late touchdowns to bring the final score to 33-17.

When asked about the game, Klatt said that LSU wasn't as dominant as the final score suggests and starts off by saying he was impressed by Miami...

Wait, what?

You can listen to the full audio here, but here is the majority of what he had to say:
quote:

"I was impressed with Miami, Klatt said. "Full disclosure, that game in the box score was much different than the scoreboard in the first half, I think that we can all agree on that. I think LSU was incredibly opportunistic but I don't think they were blowing them out..."

"Just to give you a sense of that, Miami outgained LSU on the night. Would you have even remotely thought that?"

"While the scoreboard should make you nervous for LSU, I don't think they were as dominant as the scoreboard suggests."

LSU did a great job, I'm not trying to minimize what they did," Klatt said. "We all want to make them the world beaters now, but it wasn't necessarily as dominant a game as it looked on the scoreboard. The stat sheet, everything else will tell you that."

"Did you know that LSU was only 3 of 16 on third downs? 3 of 16! Let's say Miami has half the number of penalties and doesn't turn the ball over, maybe it's a different game."
Thoughts?
Filed Under: LSU Football
99 Comments
user avatar
user avatar
foshizzle88 months
3 of 16 isn't an inspiring stat. Fortunately 4 penalties and no turnovers in the season opener is and that matters too.
user avatar
jeff7012188 months
This guy's an idiot..he picked Texas to take a MAJOR step forward in '18, had Michigan beating ND and Miami beating LSU. 0 for 3 = MAJOR DUMBASS!
user avatar
stho38188 months
A 30 point lead in the second half make the stats irrelevant, because at that point LSU is just trying to run clock, while Miami is throwing it up every play to try and get back in the game. Case in point: at 3:51 left in the 3rd quarter the score is 33-3 LSU and LSU had outgained Miami 288-174. So basically, the trash yardage in the 4th quarter to bring the game within 2 possessions wipes out the arse-whoopin LSU did on them when the game was competitive? This is a classic case of a commentator with revisionist history the further we get from the game. Bottom line is that it was a dominant win for a team that has been disrespected the entire off-season.
user avatar
TriDitty88 months
This is just a classic case of an analyst only analyzing the stat sheet and saying the obvious without watching the actual game. Anyone can do that.
user avatar
Accardo4488 months
If your aunt had a dick, she would be your uncle.
user avatar
Crop Dusting88 months
We had good field position based on crappy punts. That’s why our total yards wasn’t high
user avatar
Crop Dusting88 months
We only needed 50 yards to score touchdowns unlike Miami who needed 85 yards each possession
user avatar
rob6288 months
If Brossette was not at mid field he would hava had 80 or 90 yards on that play. The writer is an idiot.
user avatar
cas4t88 months
He failed to mention that LSU obviously took their foot off the gas in the second half. What a buffoon.
user avatar
reauxl tigers88 months
So essentially he looked at the stat line and is gauging how close the game was by that. Good to know, maybe every game should be decided by the stat line instead of the final score.
user avatar
SamuelClemens88 months
Let's say Miami has half the number of penalties and doesn't turn the ball over, maybe it's a different game." Two can play this game: Let’s say LSU completed 100% of their passes and didn’t get tackled while running with the ball.
user avatar
CDawson88 months
Eat my nuts. Miami was completely neutered until it was garbage time.
user avatar
ElderTiger88 months
Hey Joel - the line LSU +3 and LSU won by 16. That’s all I need to know.
user avatar
Stingy88 months
They should have been leading 53-3 at the beginning of the 4th but they hit the brakes.
user avatar
BTRDD88 months
and if LSU beats Auburn, they will find another reason to dis the game.
user avatar
Lsu10120588 months
Take away 2-3 really good catches on some deep balls by Miami, And his entire line of thinking goes straight in the garbage. Right where it belongs in the first place.
user avatar
GeologyGrad8888 months
Well, ol' shite for brains Klatt played for Colorado, so he knows a thing or two about what it feels like to be dominated.
user avatar
denvertiger88 months
"I was impressed with Miami" Kinda stopped listening there
user avatar
GumboPot88 months
The stat sheet? LOL. Miami got most of their stats during garbage time.
user avatar
Azkiger88 months
He was impressed with Miami but not the team who at one time in the game had scored 30 more points than Miami?
user avatar
mkibod188 months
Joel needs to lay off the Colorado dispensaries a little bit.
user avatar
CGSC Lobotomy88 months
Colorado Quarterback Joel Klatt after the 2005 Big 12 Championship game. "Texas wasn't as dominant as the score suggests" (they lost 70-3)
user avatar
lsuhou7488 months
Lol!!!!!!!!
user avatar
Mid Iowa Tiger88 months
Miami had 32 more yards in penalties is all. Miami also only had 46 more yards of total offense. wtf is this guy smoking. LSU wasn't a 'bama beater but they btho of Miami
user avatar
Mid Iowa Tiger88 months
Plus the majority of Miami's yards were in the 4th quarter.
Popular Stories
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram