by
37 Comments
Chris Parent (@chrisparent)/LSU Athletics
LSU head coach Ed Orgeron joined The Tim Fletcher Show Tuesday morning and was asked about the competition at the quarterback position and whether or not he will use a two-QB system in 2018.
quote:

Question: "Are you open to more than one quarterback receiving a high percentage of snaps in the 2018 season?"

"If we would have one dominant quarterback then he would be our guy," Orgeron said.

"And that may happen in camp and may happen in the season, but they are so close. Every day is a race and they have different skillsets and I want them to be able to use them. So I have no problem with playing two quarterbacks in the game."

"...We will name a starter at the end of camp and we will probably play two quarterbacks but this thing is going to play out through the season. We can name a starter but he still has to perform when it comes game time."

Question: "Which factor is most vital in separating Lowell Narcisse, Justin McMillan, and Myles Brennan on the depth chart?"

"Execution, Orgeron said. "Taking leadership, executing, making the proper calls, making the proper reads and being a leader on the football team. And all three of those guys have the qualities to do it. All three of those at some point have shown that in practice but the need to be more consistent."
You can listen to the full interview here.
Filed Under: LSU Football
37 Comments
user avatar
JOJO Hammer73 months
Nb4lotsofbitchingandcrying
user avatar
jpainter617473 months
Good to hear coach O on the Tim fletcher show!
user avatar
blueboy73 months
This is how failure begins.
user avatar
Solo Cam73 months
What’s the old saying? We you have 2 QB’s you don’t have 1. Before the idiot that comes in with Tebow and Leak- We’re gonna play 2 because none are good enough, urban couldn’t keep Tebow off the field
user avatar
jkylejohnson73 months
Oh no! We suck again.
user avatar
JackieTreehorn73 months
Ensmingered
user avatar
Genestealer5573 months
We will name a starter at the end of camp and we will probably play two quarterbacks but this thing is going to play out through the season. Don’t think that’s been said by many coaches prior to winning any kind of championship.
user avatar
The Levee73 months
Does it sound better than “Danny Etling is our guy”?
user avatar
Hawgnsincebirth5573 months
Saban said it a few times including the past 2 seasons and I believe the same with McCarran before he just showed out in his first game
user avatar
GoneFishing2173 months
You don’t think, but do you really know?
user avatar
Ruebacca73 months
"But this thing is going to play out through the season" are you kidding me? Make a decision and build the program with some continuity. If they really are that close, then you won't have a big gain or drop if with any of them and no one else is coming. By Aug 1, the team needs to working with the first QB, whoever that is. Get it done already.
user avatar
GoneFishing2173 months
Relax Rebecca. The first team QB will get most of the snaps with the first team.
user avatar
the paradigm73 months
I have no doubt that O's plan is to start Brennan - I'm sure (like many others did) that he would separate himself from the pack, and he try well might still be the best option. However, based on Brennan's lack of size & development, he's going to be forced to play at least one of the others.
user avatar
voodooidotwo73 months
This shows he’s leaning toward Myles. LN or Mcmillan will spell him at times running the zone read. Myles is the best passer and it shows when he plays with the first team. He kinda got screwed in the spring game. Running for his life isn’t his MO
user avatar
southsidedell73 months
This is the SEC man you are gonna be running for your life. You think he is gonna be able to just stand there against Georgia? Against Bama? It better become his MO.
user avatar
Play_Neck73 months
I thought he was the better passer too till I watched this spring game. Not sure any of the three really separate themselves in that regard, and I thought both other quarterbacks looked more comfortable.
user avatar
Smoothboy70673 months
Always making excuses for Brennan so sad SMH
user avatar
Barbellthor73 months
1: is letting the qb comp play out entirely. Competition breeds success. 2: has qb’s with lots of promise and unique skill sets, and wants to possibly utilize any or all of them. 3: no blind loyalty like in the past—you earn the spot and you get it, and you CONTINUALLY show why you should keep the spot and you’ll keep it. 4: Not going to limit our offense—can go dual threat or pro, and either can be done in a spread offense to let our playmakers loose. As long as it’s working, then it’s on to the qb who will get the job done. Honestly, coach O is not only giving us what we’ve screaming about for years, but I really think he’s going to do what gives us the best chance of winning as far as who plays over whom.
user avatar
TigerIT73 months
I'm surprised the like/dislike ratio is so high base solely on your last sentence, but I'm glad it did and I fully agree.
user avatar
Datbayoubengal73 months
I'm hoping like hell this is really what he's planning to do. I have always been behind this line of thinking. If the guys don't win it in practice, then win it on the field. Saban played Coker and Sims, Coker and Bateman, and Barnett and Hurts early in 3 consecutive years to decide his QB going forward. Those QBs went 41-4, and all played a big role in their team's success.
user avatar
c on z73 months
Looks like some things just never change.
user avatar
xGeauxLSUx73 months
That's just the way it is.
user avatar
MasonTiger73 months
In other words “Tiger QB Woes To Continue” So hope I eat those words.
user avatar
young man tiger73 months
Also, the new quarterback must execute.
user avatar
lsutigermall73 months
QBs? Why are we talking QBs? Did we get a new kicker or kicking coach?
user avatar
The Mick73 months
Aaaand here we go again. We're fricked.
user avatar
STRIPES73 months
Based on everything I have seen and info from friends I am leaning toward McMillan.
user avatar
LSUperior73 months
Open to playing two QBs actually means we have no QB.
Reply
upvote16downvote11
user avatar
LSUnibrow73 months
2006-2007 Florida Gators say hi
user avatar
rbdallas73 months
not necessarily so.
user avatar
Tigers4Lyfe73 months
Point is still taken LSUnibrow. For the most part LSUperior is right.
user avatar
texastigerr73 months
If you have 2.you don't have one.
user avatar
STRIPES73 months
If one doesn't deserve being the starter then you don't just pick one over the he other at this point. It will work itself out.
user avatar
kciDAtaE73 months
Two at a time!! Sweet
user avatar
STRIPES73 months
Uhm, if I recall correctly Bama needed 2 QBs in the NC game.
Popular Stories
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram