- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
pelicansfan123
| Favorite team: | |
| Location: | |
| Biography: | |
| Interests: | |
| Occupation: | |
| Number of Posts: | 2410 |
| Registered on: | 1/19/2015 |
| Online Status: | Not Online |
Recent Posts
Message
re: Am I just getting older or does it feel like society is collapsing?
Posted by pelicansfan123 on 5/12/26 at 9:02 am to mule74
I do wonder...everything is so so freaking expensive nowadays, what's going to happen in 10 years? Prices really can't keep rising at the rate they're rising now or else everything will be unaffordable.
Something has to change to get us off our current trajectory.
Something has to change to get us off our current trajectory.
re: This has been discussed, but 76 teams.... really?
Posted by pelicansfan123 on 5/7/26 at 5:53 pm to SouthernInsanity
I've just accepted, when it comes to college sports, to not try to think too much about the changes being made.
I disagree with almost every decision made in college sports nowadays, just feels like a massive money grab. But I'm just trying to focus on my individual teams and not the depressing state of the NCAA.
It sucks, though.
I disagree with almost every decision made in college sports nowadays, just feels like a massive money grab. But I'm just trying to focus on my individual teams and not the depressing state of the NCAA.
It sucks, though.
re: No more snacks on short Delta flights
Posted by pelicansfan123 on 5/7/26 at 8:53 am to kywildcatfanone
Normally, I would be hollering about how everything is getting worse nowadays and yada yada yada.
With that said, I just looked it up, and the one-hour flight from New Orleans to Atlanta is typically in the 423 to 472 mile range.
I don't see a world where I would take a flight 349 miles or less (as opposed to driving), let alone expect in that short time in the air that the flight attendants would be running around to deliver me snacks/drinks.
A 349-mile flight must be like 45 minutes in the air. People can wait until they land to get a snack/drink...
With that said, I just looked it up, and the one-hour flight from New Orleans to Atlanta is typically in the 423 to 472 mile range.
I don't see a world where I would take a flight 349 miles or less (as opposed to driving), let alone expect in that short time in the air that the flight attendants would be running around to deliver me snacks/drinks.
A 349-mile flight must be like 45 minutes in the air. People can wait until they land to get a snack/drink...
re: Lane Kiffin doing a photo shoot for Vanity Fair
Posted by pelicansfan123 on 4/30/26 at 3:59 pm to LSBoosie
Look, this is one of those things where it is totally fine if he goes 11-1 next year and makes a run in the playoffs.
If he goes 9-3 and crashes out early in the playoffs or misses it entirely, then you come back to stuff like this and think, "Wow, he wasn't focused at all."
If he goes 9-3 and crashes out early in the playoffs or misses it entirely, then you come back to stuff like this and think, "Wow, he wasn't focused at all."
re: Anyone here ever been to the US Open tennis?
Posted by pelicansfan123 on 4/24/26 at 3:07 pm to The Mick
I haven't ever been...but as a big tennis fan, I know how this works.
Essentially, if you're going in the first week of the tournament, there are two very different experiences.
You can buy a ticket to the big stadiums, which will allow you to see the big names. But most of the matches won't be very competitive, your seats won't be good unless you pay a lot of money, but you'll get to see the names you probably recognize.
I think that the "true" Slam experience is to get an outer court pass (especially for first two rounds). You'll be RIGHT in the action, the matches will vary, but many will be super competitive, the atmospheres will be intimate and intense, and you get to really experience tennis at the highest level from SUPER close to the court. It would be an incredible experience, you just might not know the players playing (depending on your tennis background).
Essentially, if you're going in the first week of the tournament, there are two very different experiences.
You can buy a ticket to the big stadiums, which will allow you to see the big names. But most of the matches won't be very competitive, your seats won't be good unless you pay a lot of money, but you'll get to see the names you probably recognize.
I think that the "true" Slam experience is to get an outer court pass (especially for first two rounds). You'll be RIGHT in the action, the matches will vary, but many will be super competitive, the atmospheres will be intimate and intense, and you get to really experience tennis at the highest level from SUPER close to the court. It would be an incredible experience, you just might not know the players playing (depending on your tennis background).
re: A man on a jet ski gets stuck in the middle of a shark feeding frenzy
Posted by pelicansfan123 on 4/19/26 at 7:40 am to UtahCajun
It's possible one of the sharks knocks him off the jet ski though. I'd get out of there haha
re: Top 5 most famous athletes worldwide
Posted by pelicansfan123 on 4/13/26 at 8:01 pm to RandySavage
quote:
Thinking fed or Nadal are on Jordan's level is wild, sorry man. It's not even close
I'm not going to argue with you, but let me put it this way:
The biggest basketball star right now is LeBron James, right? He has 4 million followers on instagram.
Federer? 13.1 million. Nadal? 21.2 million.
NFL is MASSIVE in the US, yet Tom Brady has over 5 million less followers compared to Nadal (although he has more than Federer.
I don't think you realize how much the rest of the world cares about tennis, even if it's a small sport in the US.
re: Top 5 most famous athletes worldwide
Posted by pelicansfan123 on 4/12/26 at 6:16 pm to RandySavage
quote:
You think Fed and Nadal are more famous than Michael Jordan or even Tiger Woods? No chance.
Yep, in the world. I don't think you realize how big both of them are across the world. Maybe Jordan is on their level, Woods not a shot.
Tennis is probably the third biggest world-wide sport behind soccer and cricket. Golf isn't even close to tennis' popularity across the world, even though it's bigger in the US.
re: Top 5 most famous athletes worldwide
Posted by pelicansfan123 on 4/12/26 at 11:08 am to RandySavage
Famous athletes worldwide?
You have a very American-centric list.
The answer is Messi, Ronaldo, Federer, Nadal, and then probably whoever the best cricket player is, as that's a massive sport globally.
You have a very American-centric list.
The answer is Messi, Ronaldo, Federer, Nadal, and then probably whoever the best cricket player is, as that's a massive sport globally.
re: CSU predicting a below average hurricane season
Posted by pelicansfan123 on 4/9/26 at 7:29 pm to nicholastiger
I don't think this is very important. There could be 100 storms, but if they're all turning into the open ocean, it doesn't matter. If there's one category five that makes landfall, that's all it takes for a catastrophe.
re: Less than half of adults in the U.S. are getting enough exercise, a new CDC report found
Posted by pelicansfan123 on 4/8/26 at 8:54 pm to RLDSC FAN
I get it for white-collar workers.
On my in-office days, if I didn't make a conscious effort to exercise (almost) every day and if I wasn't totally motivated even on days where I didn't feel like it (where I had a long day at the office), my day would consist of:
- Walking to work
- Sitting at my desk all day, only getting up to make lunch and go to the bathroom
- Walking home
And I have the luxury of getting to walk to work, versus just sitting in a car for a commute.
On my in-office days, if I didn't make a conscious effort to exercise (almost) every day and if I wasn't totally motivated even on days where I didn't feel like it (where I had a long day at the office), my day would consist of:
- Walking to work
- Sitting at my desk all day, only getting up to make lunch and go to the bathroom
- Walking home
And I have the luxury of getting to walk to work, versus just sitting in a car for a commute.
re: Did NIL kill the March Cinderella in the NCAA Tournament?
Posted by pelicansfan123 on 3/29/26 at 7:00 pm to s0tiger
quote:
A 2 vs 1 seed comeback doesn't change the point at all. Instead of 4/4 Elite 8 blowouts there were only 3/4.
Great game, but we used to have unpredictable early round upsets by mid-majors with experience over young talent. This was fun to watch.
Now we have mostly predictable early round games and still have blowouts in the Elite 8. This is less fun to watch.
Today's last game was fun to watch. The other 3 this weekend, not so much
If you're just looking at final scores, sure. Anyone who actually watched Iowa-Illinois would say it was far from an actual blowout. It was extremely back-and-forth for 36/40 minutes.
Let's agree to disagree.
re: Did NIL kill the March Cinderella in the NCAA Tournament?
Posted by pelicansfan123 on 3/29/26 at 6:39 pm to s0tiger
quote:
ewer upsets, higher seeds bolstered by transfers and NIL advancing with no trouble, absolute blowouts in the Elite 8 isn't a dramatically improved product.
There have been some great games, but there always has been. These last two tournaments have been very forgettable.
This aged terribly with the UConn ending. And we did get a 9 vs 3 seed in the elite eight too. Two 1 seeds in the final four feels very normal.
This tournament has the perfect mix of two elite teams (Arizona, Michigan), some chaos that got a 9 vs 3, but that game still felt high quality and was back-and-forth until the final four minutes, and then an epic all-timer.
re: Survivor 50 - Premiere 2/25/26
Posted by pelicansfan123 on 3/29/26 at 5:33 pm to NOSHAU
quote:
Wasn't it Dee who approached him? Without her wanting to make a move, he would have been dead in the water.
Anyone who can win over Colby and Cirie despite negative first impressions and get Cirie to give up crucial info (that she has an extra vote) is a great player in my mind.
Colby and Cirie thought at first that Rizo was going to be an annoying young kid and he won them over quickly. That shows a great social game.
re: Survivor 50 - Premiere 2/25/26
Posted by pelicansfan123 on 3/29/26 at 11:58 am to Shorter Yards
quote:
He hasn’t walked the walk but he definitely talks the talk aka a bullshitter.
Well he flipped the vote from himself to Charlie while keeping his idol...if that's not walking the walk, I don't know what is.
Come on y'all...y'all might not like him, but be objective.
re: Survivor 50 - Premiere 2/25/26
Posted by pelicansfan123 on 3/27/26 at 9:32 am to Shorter Yards
Wow, I guess I'm in the minority here but Rizo really won me over this episode.
He's fun, entertaining, and not only does he talk the talk, he walks the walk.
I don't mind players who say they're great if they back it up.
He's fun, entertaining, and not only does he talk the talk, he walks the walk.
I don't mind players who say they're great if they back it up.
re: Survivor 50 - Premiere 2/25/26
Posted by pelicansfan123 on 3/21/26 at 7:31 am to LSUBoo
It's so ridiculous that Zac Brown has more confessionals than Tiffany on this season so far.
re: Should be illegal to play on all turf field.
Posted by pelicansfan123 on 3/14/26 at 9:07 pm to OysterPoBoy
Dude, LSU is down 9-1...it's not the turf.
re: Survivor 50 - Premiere 2/25/26
Posted by pelicansfan123 on 3/14/26 at 9:24 am to williamfrench3559
quote:
Am I the only one who can't stand they stay on this same lame arse island for many seasons now? Part of the charm of the show was different hardship, bounty and adaptation to unknown places. It's cookie cutter challenge obstacles now that barely change at all. And almost zero foraging and fishing anymore.
I think the biggest issues with the show are: not moving locations, not having it be 39 days anymore (or at least a full month where you really feel like the players are having to survive out there), not having themed seasons anymore (and this lame "hands of the fans" I'm not counting), and the lack of diversity in life experience amongst the contestants.
I think they've made a push for more diversity which I think is great. But, you don't have people from all walks of life combining on the same island for a social experiment anymore. It's just a lot of upper-middle class, white collar people.
re: Miami Ohio goes 31-0 in the regular season then loses their first conference tourney game.
Posted by pelicansfan123 on 3/12/26 at 8:23 pm to crimsoncoded94
They have to make it because of their record but this is one of the biggest fluke seasons in NCAAB history.
They lucked into so many wins this season, they should have 4-6 losses even with their extremely easy schedule.
They lucked into so many wins this season, they should have 4-6 losses even with their extremely easy schedule.
re: Survivor 50 - Premiere 2/25/26
Posted by pelicansfan123 on 3/12/26 at 8:15 pm to LSUBoo
That felt like a weak episode, a real come-down from the excitement of season 50 premiering.
We didn't really get to see the tribe dynamics of 2 of the 3 tribes play out before the early tribe swap because only one tribe went to tribal council. Q did a great job of building an alliance/trust on his original tribe and got swapped without even going to a tribal council to a different tribe that just so happened to have three D vs G people that might or might not have had a pregame alliance.
Too much Emily Flippen and Charlie/Rizo too. I think most of us are watching this season for Coach, Ozzie, Cirie, Colby, etc.. We're not here to watch Emily Flippen, who shouldn't have been on this season in the first place, fumble her way through the pre-merge.
Q going home also just brought down the entertainment value of the rest of the season big time.
We didn't really get to see the tribe dynamics of 2 of the 3 tribes play out before the early tribe swap because only one tribe went to tribal council. Q did a great job of building an alliance/trust on his original tribe and got swapped without even going to a tribal council to a different tribe that just so happened to have three D vs G people that might or might not have had a pregame alliance.
Too much Emily Flippen and Charlie/Rizo too. I think most of us are watching this season for Coach, Ozzie, Cirie, Colby, etc.. We're not here to watch Emily Flippen, who shouldn't have been on this season in the first place, fumble her way through the pre-merge.
Q going home also just brought down the entertainment value of the rest of the season big time.
Popular
2












