Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

Pro/Rel questions

Posted on 7/9/26 at 10:43 am
Posted by RoyalAir
Detroit
Member since Dec 2012
7707 posts
Posted on 7/9/26 at 10:43 am
I see a lot of talk and chatter that the US soccer pyramid is nonfunctional because it doesn't embrace pro/rel like the Euro leagues.

This isn't a flame. It's a genuine question. What major advantage would pro/rel have with introducing it to the US pyramid? Why would MLS become a better product and produce more/better/talented players if Minnesota United could get swapped out for FC Chattanooga at the end of the year?

Maybe more succinctly, what would be added by potentially destabilizing the nature/roster of the MLS teams?
Posted by wm72
Brooklyn
Member since Mar 2010
9542 posts
Posted on 7/9/26 at 10:59 am to
The argument for relegation is that the huge financial loss of potential relegation forces clubs to focus / invest more on youth development.

Mainly to have youth assets ready to step in and play if relegated and ones that can be sold. Also, relegation battles in Europe usually see a lot of youth players being given more first team minutes/chances.

I follow Serie A, but sure the other leagues are similar. One of the main places you see young players "break out" is playing for Serie B clubs fighting for promotion too.


This post was edited on 7/10/26 at 1:24 pm
Posted by BamaCoaster
God's Gulf
Member since Apr 2016
7298 posts
Posted on 7/9/26 at 11:00 am to
It would financially incentive owners to try and develop players to sell them, to win, and to be the best.
Right now, that incentive is not there.
Posted by ShrevetownTiger
Shreveport
Member since Jan 2007
3593 posts
Posted on 7/9/26 at 11:04 am to
quote:

Right now, that incentive is not there.


Here’s looking at you, Sporting KC!
Posted by Broski
Member since Jun 2011
82701 posts
Posted on 7/9/26 at 11:33 am to
USL will be introducing pro/rel in 2028. We'll see how that goes in terms of putting pressure on the MLS to come to the table in hopes of absorbing USL and creating pro/rel across 4 divisions.

Not sure it will, but crazier things have happened
Posted by DandA
Mandevillian
Member since Jun 2018
1039 posts
Posted on 7/9/26 at 11:55 am to
quote:

financially incentive owners to try and develop players to sell them, to win


Correct
Posted by dgnx6
Member since Feb 2006
90914 posts
Posted on 7/10/26 at 12:03 pm to
The tanking to get first pick is bush league shite.

Obviously you can't do relegation trying to grow the league and get investors.

But we reward losers in this country.



Posted by JerryTheKingBawler
South of Memphis
Member since Jan 2023
9097 posts
Posted on 7/10/26 at 12:08 pm to
Relegation can lead to financial ruin. American sports are about the owners making money. Will never happen.
Posted by AUin02
Member since Jan 2012
4605 posts
Posted on 7/10/26 at 3:52 pm to
In current sports like the NFL and NBA doing poorly gives you the benefit of better draft picks. With no threat of losing your place in the league there is a benefit to tanking once it is clear the season is over.

With promotion/relegation the hungry teams/owners advance up the pyramid towards the top, while the complacent ones get bounced down. There's a tremendous incentive to both reinvest the money made by the team, tv deals, merch, player sales etc into improving the team both by adding big name players to the roster (often from other leagues) and by developing your youth players to either become new faces of the team, or sold to other leagues to help fund the team's ambition.

So it creates a farm system that is sharpened over time, and relegation is such a threat (loss of tv revenue etc) that teams have an incentive to be competitive.
Posted by RemouladeSawce
Uranus
Member since Sep 2008
18364 posts
Posted on 7/10/26 at 4:48 pm to
quote:

USL will be introducing pro/rel in 2028. We'll see how that goes in terms of putting pressure on the MLS
If a league pro/rels in a forest and no one is around to watch it, does it induce pressure?

There isn’t going to be a surge in watching play that’s inferior to MLS in small tiny markets just because they have pro/rel. And the first relegated USL teams are really going to feel it when they’re pushed to insolvency

I would give it 1-2 seasons before they realize they have to can it. They don’t have the stability in support
Posted by Adam Banks
District 5
Member since Sep 2009
38191 posts
Posted on 7/10/26 at 6:35 pm to
quote:

In current sports like the NFL and NBA doing poorly gives you the benefit of better draft picks. With no threat of losing your place in the league there is a benefit to tanking once it is clear the season is over. With promotion/relegation the hungry teams/owners advance up the pyramid towards the top, while the complacent ones get bounced down. There's a tremendous incentive to both reinvest the money made by the team, tv deals, merch, player sales etc into improving the team both by adding big name players to the roster (often from other leagues) and by developing your youth players to either become new faces of the team, or sold to other leagues to help fund the team's ambition. So it creates a farm system that is sharpened over time, and relegation is such a threat (loss of tv revenue etc) that teams have an incentive to be competitive.



Relegation only helps the very top because the lower end are constantly having to take shortcuts to avoid financial ruin.




Compare the variety of champions across any of the big 3 us leagues recently compared to bundesliga ligue 1 serie A or La liga.
This post was edited on 7/10/26 at 6:41 pm
Posted by Bigbens42
Trussvegas
Member since Nov 2013
21285 posts
Posted on 7/10/26 at 6:35 pm to
quote:

I would give it 1-2 seasons before they realize they have to can it. They don’t have the stability in support


Could do something like the prem does with parachute payments.
Posted by Adam Banks
District 5
Member since Sep 2009
38191 posts
Posted on 7/10/26 at 6:40 pm to
Great idea for a fledgling league to pay teams that aren’t in it.



Definitely going to work
Posted by Broski
Member since Jun 2011
82701 posts
Posted on 7/10/26 at 7:32 pm to
quote:

I would give it 1-2 seasons before they realize they have to can it. They don’t have the stability in support


Considering there isn't a drastic CBA difference in salaries currently between USL Championship and USL League One, they can definitely support arbitrarily moving up and down divisions without their current payroll really changing all that much.

With that said, you're correct in saying that pro/rel won't suddenly make the USL compete with MLS in terms of viewership... no matter how many times SCH has said it would on here.
This post was edited on 7/11/26 at 12:41 am
Posted by KiwiHead
Auckland, NZ
Member since Jul 2014
38114 posts
Posted on 7/11/26 at 8:12 am to
MLS has to get viewership up on the broadcast level. .ore eyes on the tube leads to more sponsors. I'd keep the hydration breaks.....could be prime commercial revenue times.

More money coming in would lead to a lot of positive things. Also, as much as many want to move the season in line with Europe, that would be a suicide moment. Competition with the NBA and MLB is far easier than compering with the NFL, CFB and NBA
Posted by RemouladeSawce
Uranus
Member since Sep 2008
18364 posts
Posted on 7/11/26 at 10:36 am to
quote:

Also, as much as many want to move the season in line with Europe, that would be a suicide moment
Well we're about to watch a death because that's happening next season
This post was edited on 7/11/26 at 10:49 am
Posted by Bigdawgb
Member since Oct 2023
4507 posts
Posted on 7/11/26 at 11:46 am to
quote:

Well we're about to watch a death because that's happening next season


This is a big reason that I'm glad to see Garber go, obviously he's been amazing for the league & had his day, but the last few years it feels like MLS has completely stagnated because of decisions like this.
Posted by DandA
Mandevillian
Member since Jun 2018
1039 posts
Posted on 7/11/26 at 12:13 pm to
The physical distances between teams and travel also play a role in how a promotion/relegation system would work here. The entire UK is roughly the size of Michigan. The largest country in Western Europe, France, is a little smaller than Texas. To make any true promotion/relegation system more feasible, we would probably have to regionalize lower tiers and keep the top league as the nationwide league.
Posted by KiwiHead
Auckland, NZ
Member since Jul 2014
38114 posts
Posted on 7/12/26 at 8:14 am to
What a colossally stupid move. I understand the reasons for it, but in the US competing with the NFL, CFB and the NBA is suicide due to sheer stupidity. It should be part of that show "1000 ways to Die" Right up there with the guy who injected himself with the chem light gel so he could make his veins glow while DJ.

NFL owns Sunday and Monday night and halfway has Thursday night. CFB owns Saturday. What are they going to do....Wednesday Night Soccer?

Keep it in Spring and Summer and into the early to mid Fall. Less people like baseball and the NBA than NFL and CFB.
Posted by theballguy
HSV (Dealing only in satire)
Member since Oct 2011
39736 posts
Posted on 7/12/26 at 8:55 am to
I can't wait for this.

I think all sports should have it.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram