- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: You Member When Kamala’s Family Owned Slaves OnTheir Plantation?
Posted on 6/29/19 at 6:14 pm to Taxing Authority
Posted on 6/29/19 at 6:14 pm to Taxing Authority
quote:Ok
Please link where I attributed it to you. I didn’t. I attributed it to modern leftism.
quote:Seems to be a pretty clear reference.
You seem NOT responsible for ....
1
Posted on 6/29/19 at 6:15 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
Calculate anything you want. I do not care how MUCH ancestry you have in each category.
quote:Im a LA native. My great grandfather immigrated here from Europe in 1903. Am I full of shite?
I was simply demonstrating that a Southerner who claims to have ZERO slave-owner ancestry is likely full of shite.
Posted on 6/29/19 at 6:16 pm to Taxing Authority
quote:In response to Hank, TA attributed a series of positions to “you.”
Another one that can’t differentiate between “AggieHank” and “modern leftism”
Perhaps TA is not a native speaker of the English language.
Posted on 6/29/19 at 6:19 pm to Taxing Authority
quote:Probably.
Im a LA native. My great grandfather immigrated here from Europe in 1903. Am I full of shite?
Who did granddaddy marry? Was she a native Southerner? Who did daddy marry? Was she a native Southerner? Who did TA marry?
If any of the wives were not immigrants, the analysis still applies, and you PROBABLY have a slave-owner in your family tree ... just not on the paternal line
This post was edited on 6/29/19 at 6:20 pm
Posted on 6/29/19 at 6:19 pm to OTIS2
The Gores had slaverowners amongst their ancestors as well.
Posted on 6/29/19 at 6:20 pm to HubbaBubba
quote:
Can't she just suck on her own?
From all published reports, she sucks a lot on her own.
Especially dudes who can help her political career.
Posted on 6/29/19 at 6:20 pm to AggieHank86
quote:Indeed it was clear. That was a collective reference to “white southerners”, which is clear when you don’t cut off the part you excised.
You seem NOT responsible for ....
Seems to be a pretty clear reference.
Did you really think that paragraph was addressed to you?
Perhaps you’re not a native speaker of the English language.
Hint: that time you’re is a reference to you—AggieHank . Just tryin to help you out here.
This post was edited on 6/29/19 at 6:26 pm
Posted on 6/29/19 at 6:24 pm to AggieHank86
quote:Yep. Her father immigrated from France, though.
Who did granddaddy marry? Was she a native Southerner?
quote:Nope. Grew up in a free state.
Who did daddy marry? Was she a native Southerner?
quote:An immigrant from Asia
Who did TA marry?
quote:nope. There are way to many exceptions to support your claim unless you ignore tons of data and replace it with prejudiced stereotyping. It is what it is.
If any of the wives were not immigrants, the analysis still applies, and you PROBABLY have a slave-owner in your family tree ... just not on the paternal line
This post was edited on 6/29/19 at 6:27 pm
Posted on 6/29/19 at 6:33 pm to Taxing Authority
quote:
Me too. Another one that can’t differentiate between “AggieHank” and “modern leftism”. Interesting.
You quoted him, not me. What would any one else think you were trying to imply?
This post was edited on 6/29/19 at 6:36 pm
Posted on 6/29/19 at 6:55 pm to AggieHank86
So the 20 million whites and 7 million blacks who fled the south after the civil war savaged the countryside and decimated the agricultural industry for generations were “mostly from Appalachia”? Lol.
According to fricking Politifact, less than 5% of people in 1860 owned slaves. So considering this, and the fact 20 million potential slave owning ancestors left the South, only to be replaced by non slave owning Europeans post emancipation, you are still going to try to argue that “90% of current Southern whites are related to slave owners?” Your idiocy knows no limits.
According to fricking Politifact, less than 5% of people in 1860 owned slaves. So considering this, and the fact 20 million potential slave owning ancestors left the South, only to be replaced by non slave owning Europeans post emancipation, you are still going to try to argue that “90% of current Southern whites are related to slave owners?” Your idiocy knows no limits.
Posted on 6/29/19 at 6:57 pm to Taxing Authority
quote:And her mother? The mother’s parents and grandparents? Etc.quote:Yep. Her father immigrated from France, though.
Who did granddaddy marry? Was she a native Southerner?
AGAIN, you have 256 ancestors dating back to Emancipation. If you live in the South, the chances are TINY that none of them owned a slave.
Maybe you are the rare, rare exception, but odds say that you are not.
This post was edited on 6/29/19 at 7:01 pm
Posted on 6/29/19 at 7:00 pm to Jorts R Us
quote:
You quoted him, not me. What would any one else think you were trying to imply?
I guess you’re right. If people can’t tell the difference between his position and the position of modern leftism—I guess it is confusing.
Posted on 6/29/19 at 7:17 pm to Vacherie Saint
quote:Those who LEFT are utterly IRRELEVANT to this analysis. Those who REMAINED were slaveholders (25-50% of them), and THEIR descendants are the modern Southerners.
the 20 million whites ... who fled the south after the civil war ....
Sure, some of them married new immigrants and Northern transplants, but the offspring and descendants of those immigrants and transplants STILL descend partially from slave owners ... even if only on one side.
If they marry more immigrants and transplants for several generations (as TA claims), they might be only so-descended 10% or less, but the percent is irrelevant to my point that they ARE descended from a slave owner ... even if only 1/256
Posted on 6/29/19 at 7:21 pm to AggieHank86
quote:*yawn* it’s funny how your original “analysis” didn’t bother to look so deep.
And her mother? The mother’s parents and grandparents? Etc.
quote:Nope.
AGAIN, you have 256 ancestors dating back to Emancipation.
quote:Nope. See the ownership stats. None of my family was wealthy. (Most southerners weren’t). The odds of them owning slaves are tiny. You have this completely backwards.
If you live in the South, the chances are TINY that none of them owned a slave.
I don’t know to help you. The information is easily found. It’s been given to you in this thread. And it’s easily confirmed.
quote:Nope.
Maybe you are the rare, rare exception, but odds say that you are not.
This post was edited on 6/29/19 at 7:25 pm
Posted on 6/29/19 at 7:26 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
she had a slave-owning ancestor something like eight generations back.
I would be quite surprised if the same is not true of 90% of Southerners.
Are you serious?
Just skimmed the thread. I see that you are in fact, serious. carry on
This post was edited on 6/29/19 at 7:43 pm
Posted on 6/29/19 at 7:29 pm to AggieHank86
How are they irrelevant when a gigantic swath overlying a very small potential gene pool left the population in the years immediately following emancipation? Remember, YOU are the one claiming that 5% morphed into 90% of current Southern whites being descendants of slave owners.
Furthermore, how do you explain a black population, nearly 100% West/Central African slave in 1860, today being only about 60% west/central African in descent according to modern genetic research? And don’t you dare blame post emancipation black migration because you already said this is irrelevant for whites.
Is math backward in the South too? Admit it. You can’t back up what you said.
Furthermore, how do you explain a black population, nearly 100% West/Central African slave in 1860, today being only about 60% west/central African in descent according to modern genetic research? And don’t you dare blame post emancipation black migration because you already said this is irrelevant for whites.
Is math backward in the South too? Admit it. You can’t back up what you said.
This post was edited on 6/29/19 at 7:44 pm
Posted on 6/29/19 at 7:46 pm to OTIS2
quote:Epic stupid thread, even for this board.
You Member When Kamala’s Family Owned Slaves OnTheir Plantation?
A Jamaican slave owner raped a slave to start Harris' white lineage.
So you morons think Harris is a guilty descendant of that slave owner.
Posted on 6/29/19 at 7:48 pm to WB Davis
No more guilty than I am for having a slave owner somewhere in my gene pool.
Should she have to pay rape reparations to the Jamaican slave’s descendants?
Should she have to pay rape reparations to the Jamaican slave’s descendants?
Posted on 6/29/19 at 7:54 pm to Vacherie Saint
quote:
How are they irrelevant when a gigantic swath overlying a very small potential gene pool left the population in the years immediately following emancipation?
Its not irrelevant
It's just one of several things that has to be ignored for his theory to make sense.
Posted on 6/29/19 at 7:55 pm to geauxtigahs87
Shhhhh! I want him to use this excuse to explain away black African descendency moving in the exact opposite direction over the same period.
Page 5 of 8
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News