re: X claims stage 4 cancer patients are responding to Ivermectin & Fenbendazole

Maybe this is why Trump said we are so close to a cure.

I knew an older doctor at LSU Med who back in the 90's was saying to med students that the key to long term health was twofold. Decent diets that minimized excess dairy and very few carbs, AND figuring out how to tackle hypertension....cure it. In his mind hypertension was the biggest killer and it lead to a whole host of other problems....like cancer

My dad died of pancreatic cancer in 2017. I knew it was a death sentence immediately. Took him to the Bruno Center in Birmingham for treatment because my mom wanted hope that he could live a little longer. He was pumped full of chemo for 4-5 months then multiple radiation treatments on his brain as it spread. We still have the head and face mold from the radiation.

After less than 3 month I knew it was all a waste of time. Mom and dad wanted to keep going because the doctor said it could prolong my dad’s life. He lived 7 months from diagnosis. I’ll never forgive that oncologist or the entire Cancer Industrial Complex for burning my dad’s body up for money.

Floridasharkman on Truth Social has a couple of different protocols out.

The tippins protocol is basically micro dosing. He has to keep taking it or the cancers come back.

Fenbendazole attacks cancer in 3 different ways, ivermectin (iirc) in 2 ways.

When my wife was diagnosed with cancer I wrote her chemo doc a long letter about fenbendazole, gave him links to studies, all that. He was very nice but told my wife she should not take any of it... Very dangerous.
I was shocked.. an doctor from India was saying antiparasitics were dangerous.
And then his clinic spent a couple of years raping my wallet and my insurance company treating her cancer.. to no avail.

Their clinic is expanding.
Cancer treatment is a gold mine.

quote:

---

The tippins protocol is basically micro dosing

---

He was also undergoing traditional cancer treatments at the time of his antifungal use.

If a disease is cured, then you don’t need continue curing it. I’m not saying that these drugs are a catch all treatment. But logically, if fewer diseases are in need of being treated, then there will be less money to be made on those treatments.

On a final note, I’m not suggesting that those working in medicine are anything other than altruistic in their desire to help others. But even they shite on Ivermectin as a part of an ambulatory package, when there was ample anecdotal evidence to support looking into it. Instead, the NIH “studied” its effectiveness as it was being given to patients on the verge of death. Then, after they (unsurprisingly) died, claimed that it didn’t work. They also tested it independently, and not as a part of the drug cocktail that seemed (anecdotally…since studies weren’t being done at the time) to be most effective.

Lastly, the way that NAC was restricted should have been a major red flag for anyone with common sense. Noting a “clerical error” from 50 years prior as a means to restrict its usage was unadulterated horseshite. Especially when considering that improved lung function is sometimes (usually?) seen with administering it. I mean, how many Covid patients would have benefited from improved lung function?

The Hippocratic oath associated with the medical profession seemed to have been hamstrung by those in charge at that time.

The damage done to the reputation of the profession as a by-product of those decisions at that time is a damned shame.



TLDR

Drugs that worked seemed to be intentionally restricted at a time of need. Treating cancer, as opposed to Covid, may be no different. Just my .02.

quote:

---

Make sure if you ever get cancer you only listen to your doctor, please.

---

The same one who lied about the biological weapon being a vaccine that’s safe & effective?

quote:

---

his curable cancer became incurable.

---

WTF are you talking about?

Jobs had incurable pancreatic cancer. He did do experimental treatments, as any rich, terminally ill person would.

quote:

---

Steve Jobs passed away at only 56 years old after battling pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor, a rare form of pancreatic cancer.

---

quote:

---

Logically we should all be taking ivermectin regularly to prevent cancer from forming

---

We take it weekly

quote:

---

WTF are you talking about?

Jobs had incurable pancreatic cancer.

---

His decision to delay surgery for months and rely on holistic treatments made his cancer incurable (it spread, etc.)

LINK

quote:

---

Begley quotes several cancer specialists who say Jobs might have had a good chance of living much longer than he did had he taken a more aggressive course upon learning about his illness. She explains in the article that there are different kinds of pancreatic cancer, and that while some doom a patient to a quick death, others are clearly more treatable.

“Jobs learned in 2003 that he had an extremely rare form of this cancer, an islet-cell neuroendocrine tumor,” she wrote. “As the name implies, it arises from islet cells, the specialized factories within the pancreas that produce and secrete insulin, which cells need in order to take in glucose from the food we eat. Unlike pancreatic cancer, with neuroendocrine cancer ‘if you catch it early, there is a real potential for cure,’ says cancer surgeon Joseph Kim of City of Hope, a comprehensive cancer center in Duarte, Calif.'”

Dr. Kim told this newspaper Thursday that while it’s not uncommon for a newly diagnosed cancer patient to want to try alternative cures before proceeding with more proven and often drastic ones, such as surgery or radiation, it’s reasonable to assume that Jobs’ survival chances would have been greatly improved had he just hit his cancer hard from the get-go. And, Kim added, it was surprising that Jobs, of all people, decided on the course he did.

---