re: Would you baws be more open to taking a non mRNA vaccine?

First - eliminate the complete f*cking immunity given to the manufacturers.

Second- just like every other drug, require the manufacturers to inform the public who is at risk and what are the potential side effects.


Remember, these drugs are only approved for EMERGENCY USE. Why would anyone put this in their body when there’s a 99.99% chance they'll live if they get the underlying disease?


But, what we all know is that if they eliminated the complete f*cking immunity these manufacturers have been given, they would pull these drugs from the market immediately. If that doesn’t make you step back, rethink your decision, and say WHAT THE F*CK DID I DO, then you are a f*cking moron.


To me, this is just plain common f*cking sense.

It won't get rolled out or approved by the FDA and people will 100% know that this mRNA vaccine stuff is political and nothing about health.

At this point covid is minimal risk to healthy people. It isn't debilitating like polio. The death rate is currently lower than the seasonal flu. Furthermore, I've had the virus and carry antibodies.

Why would I take a vaccine, of any kind, for a virus that I've had and carry natural defense mechanisms?

This whole vaccine push is looking a lot like a money grab. Take the vaccine, but you can still get and transmit the virus. Take the vaccine it prevents death, but it may cause undisclosed side effects or reactions. No thanks

No I am not interested in any vaccine

Yes. I'm more interested and open to a fully tested and authorized vaccine meeting the same testing and authorization requirements of the vaccines I have already taken over an experimental vaccine.

J&J is not mRNA

I am not worried about mRNA vaccines. I suspect the doses are MUCH more consistent that ones made from weakened virus.

mRNA is much more precise and it doesn't come with all the other RNA a weakened virus would have.

frick no

I’d consider Novavax if it gets approved it supposedly uses a method similar to the flu shot.

I read it protects against variants and is a more traditional vaccine

quote:

---

. It is supposed to be less effective at 70-80% efficacy, but can prevent hospitalization and death

---

We don't know this...

Because the false PCR tests caused a number swell in rona cases last year, we have no basis to assume it is actually more effective other than listening to the Empire and their subsidiaries, the profitable drug manufacturers.

We know people are still dying from the rona, even with the vaccine, and no comorbidities (my military buddy's dad died yesterday from it). And we know the vaccine kills people outright. Those are things we know...efficacy rates are sold with the vaccine...

Much like the cigarette manufacturers sold health information with the cigarettes.