Started By
Message

re: Would you baws be more open to taking a non mRNA vaccine?

Posted on 8/5/21 at 4:31 pm to
Posted by IceTiger
Really hot place
Member since Oct 2007
26584 posts
Posted on 8/5/21 at 4:31 pm to
quote:


If you made every pharmaceutical company liability for side effects they didn’t know about, you wouldn’t have pharmaceuticals


They know it can cause death to run mRNA...it's not that they didn't know.
RMC look into mRNA studies
Posted by SammyTiger
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Feb 2009
66417 posts
Posted on 8/5/21 at 4:40 pm to
quote:

However, the vaccines given in this paper were not the same as the current mRNA vaccines. The challenging virus was, of course, not SARS-CoV-2. The animals did not die of the disease, they were sacrificed. All other statements concerning this paper are opinions. Does this paper have anything to do with the current vaccines?


Didn’t even read the fricking article you linked.

Posted by sportsaddit68
Hammond
Member since Sep 2008
5840 posts
Posted on 8/5/21 at 4:44 pm to
Novavax is the one I have been leaning towards when it becomes available. I'm not leaning at all on the mRNA ones.
Posted by bleuman
England
Member since Sep 2009
8830 posts
Posted on 8/5/21 at 4:55 pm to
I live in England now. I got the AZ. All good, no side effects other than bit tired after the first one.

Second shot zero side effects. I’ve been fully vaxxed over two months now. Still no 5G, unfortunately. Cell reception in England is shite. I’d benefit from 5G.

However, I want to visit home (Louisiana) in the fall, I need the US to accept and recognize the AZ vaccine. My LSU season tickets are calling my name.

We shall see.
Posted by Bomont
Member since May 2021
975 posts
Posted on 8/5/21 at 5:42 pm to
Money, power, control, and population control
Posted by Diamondawg
Mississippi
Member since Oct 2006
32220 posts
Posted on 8/5/21 at 5:48 pm to
quote:

Would you baws be more open to taking a non mRNA vaccine?
I hate the term but plenty of "baws" on here will take horse medicine without long term studies on humans but not a vaccine. Baffles me but either should be totally voluntary and as I comment on companies requiring it, I am against any forced vaccination. I understand hospitals just having to do it from a risk management standpoint, been requiring flu shots for years, but most of the companies and governmental entities are doing it out sheer virtue signaling.
Posted by russinbr
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2004
127 posts
Posted on 8/5/21 at 5:54 pm to
How bout you shove your vaccine up your twat. If your vaccine works so good don’t worry about my status.
Posted by jmon
Mandeville, LA
Member since Oct 2010
8406 posts
Posted on 8/5/21 at 7:32 pm to
quote:

this swill being peddled is on equal footing with YEARS of clinical testing?

The method by which medicines are made today is far superior to what was done to bring those medicines to market.
Do you not think medical science has improved in the last 70 years? Are you aware of how the covid vaccine was developed, and how it works?
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 3Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram