Started By
Message

re: World GDP rose by 35% over the last 10 years yet GDP of USA was a modest 28%

Posted on 4/4/25 at 10:59 pm to
Posted by Robin Masters
Birmingham
Member since Jul 2010
35947 posts
Posted on 4/4/25 at 10:59 pm to
quote:

Expecting the U.S. service economy to grow like industrializing China or India is like expecting a retired marathon runner to keep setting personal records just because a teenager who just bought their first pair of sneakers is suddenly sprinting everywhere. At a certain point, economies are not going to grow that fast.


I’m not expecting us to keep up with China or India. We are below the average of the top 20 though.
Posted by Ingeniero
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2013
23044 posts
Posted on 4/4/25 at 11:01 pm to
quote:

Expecting the U.S. service economy to grow like industrializing China or India is like expecting a retired marathon runner to keep setting personal records just because a teenager who just bought their first pair of sneakers is suddenly sprinting everywhere


I cut 15 minutes off my half marathon. Those Kenyans are only getting better by like 3 seconds at a time. They must suck at this running thing
Posted by TheIndulger
Member since Sep 2011
19416 posts
Posted on 4/4/25 at 11:01 pm to
quote:

If you have 1 billion dollars and make another 100 million, but some homeless Somalian goes from a net worth of $1 to $2, did he end up better than you because his net worth grew by 100


According to Robin masters he outperformed you by 90% and the US is the laughing stock of Somalia
Posted by TigerDoc
Texas
Member since Apr 2004
11880 posts
Posted on 4/4/25 at 11:01 pm to
If you compare us to similar economies as ours, we're growing faster.
This post was edited on 4/4/25 at 11:03 pm
Posted by Hayekian serf
GA
Member since Dec 2020
4215 posts
Posted on 4/4/25 at 11:02 pm to
Have you ever heard of convergence theory or the concept of the developing world?

Of course countries like India, China, and Indonesia are posting higher GDP growth rates—they’re starting from much lower baselines. When a nation transitions from agrarian poverty to industrialization, you’ll naturally see larger percentage gains. That’s not a failure of the U.S.—it’s a sign that global capitalism is doing exactly what it’s supposed to: lifting more people out of poverty.

The U.S. already has a mature, service-based economy. Sustained 2–3% annual GDP growth from a $25 trillion base is an entirely different animal than 6% growth in a $3 trillion economy. Absolute gains matter more than relative percentages. In fact, the U.S. has added over $5 trillion to its GDP in the last decade—more than the entire GDP of most of the countries on that list.

This isn’t a race where someone has to lose for others to win. It’s not zero-sum. Global growth driven by free markets, trade, and innovation is a rising tide that can lift all boats—if we don’t torpedo ourselves with economic illiteracy.
Posted by Ingeniero
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2013
23044 posts
Posted on 4/4/25 at 11:06 pm to
quote:

Hayekian serf




You know your stuff
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
477254 posts
Posted on 4/4/25 at 11:08 pm to
Between this thread and the "Did the Economist" thread tonight, they're not sending their best
Posted by Robin Masters
Birmingham
Member since Jul 2010
35947 posts
Posted on 4/4/25 at 11:08 pm to
quote:

course countries like India, China, and Indonesia are posting higher GDP growth rates—they’re starting from much lower baselines. When a nation transitions from agrarian poverty to industrialization, you’ll naturally see larger percentage gains. That’s not a failure of the U.S.—it’s a sign that global capitalism is doing exactly what it’s supposed to: lif


Again, I wouldn’t expect to match growth of China and India. However we do not appear to be matching growth of the rest of the industrial world. As I expressed in the OP.
Posted by beaux duke
Member since Oct 2023
4911 posts
Posted on 4/4/25 at 11:13 pm to
how is it possible not to understand this?
oh wait....
Posted by Ingeniero
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2013
23044 posts
Posted on 4/4/25 at 11:17 pm to
Tomorrow I might start a thread on Ricardian comparative advantage. Me and my new Austrian school buddy are gonna recreate that dunk pic of LeBron and DWade on the 2010 heat
Posted by TigerDoc
Texas
Member since Apr 2004
11880 posts
Posted on 4/4/25 at 11:21 pm to
quote:

However we do not appear to be matching growth of the rest of the industrial world


The rest of the world we're behind in growth is able to do fast catch-up growth because they're able to adopt innovations created by advanced countries that they don't have (like better tech, and adding high-yield infrastructure like building airports, advanced ports, bridges, roads, other infrastructure that we developed long ago). We have invest more for lower growth because for us to grow, we're innovating and that's more expensive and slower than copy-cat. It's apples and oranges.
This post was edited on 4/4/25 at 11:29 pm
Posted by Robin Masters
Birmingham
Member since Jul 2010
35947 posts
Posted on 4/4/25 at 11:34 pm to
quote:

The rest of the world we're behind in growth are able to do fast catch-up growth because they're able to adopt innovations created by advanced countries that they don't have (like building airports, advanced ports, bridges, roads, other infrastructure). We have invest more for lower growth because for us to grow, we're innovating and that's more expensive and slower than copy-cat. It's apples and oranges.


Again, I don’t think matching the avg growth rate of the rest of the world is too much to ask. We seem to be well below it. But maybe I’m the crazy one. I’ve been wrong before…summer of 96 if I remember correctly. It was a Tuesday.

Posted by Narax
Member since Jan 2023
7971 posts
Posted on 4/4/25 at 11:36 pm to
quote:

Do you realize how impressive this is for the US?

Hint: when you start from a big number, % growth is much more difficult.

Hint: we started at #1 10 years ago


Yup, there's no one to help us catch up, no tech we can mass import or steal, no vast uneducated army.

The fact that we ripped along at 28% compared to the other leading economies (Seriously check the other EU and Asian countries) ROK and USA have been flying.

And unlike ROK we haven't terminally declined our birth rate yet.
Posted by Azkiger
Member since Nov 2016
28181 posts
Posted on 4/4/25 at 11:39 pm to
quote:

I actually did some napkin math for people who don't math good


Ironically, your percentage math ignored percentages.

While you do need more growth, you have more workers to produce that growth.

That's literally why you look at this through the lens of percentages. But it doesn't paint the narrative you want it to paint, so of course you're going to play dumb.
This post was edited on 4/4/25 at 11:51 pm
Posted by AbuTheMonkey
Chicago, IL
Member since May 2014
8646 posts
Posted on 4/4/25 at 11:53 pm to
This might be one of the stupidest OP's I have seen in this forum over the past week, and that is putting it amongst some half-witted Hall of Fame posts.
Posted by RohanGonzales
Pronoun: Whatever
Member since Apr 2024
10716 posts
Posted on 4/4/25 at 11:54 pm to
quote:

Every % of growth for us was harder than anyone else,

And we still almost kept pace with the world, given that difficulty.

It's amazing


20% off is not "almost kept pace".

I cannot figure out if you are an idiot or you just think everyone else is.
Posted by AbuTheMonkey
Chicago, IL
Member since May 2014
8646 posts
Posted on 4/4/25 at 11:55 pm to
quote:

Again, I wouldn’t expect to match growth of China and India. However we do not appear to be matching growth of the rest of the industrial world. As I expressed in the OP.


Name another large, developed economy that has outgrown the U.S. year over year over the last twenty years. Go ahead and find that for me, numbnuts.
Posted by stuntman
Florida
Member since Jan 2013
10906 posts
Posted on 4/5/25 at 12:10 am to
In the last ten years, my small business has grown by over 1,000%. Sounds impressive until you realize that my starting point was pretty frigging low.

A lot of the countries you listed started low, so of course their numbers are easier to pop off the page when you give certain stats.

This reminds me of people who bashed Kansas after the tax cuts saying that their employment rate didn't rise as fast as everyone else, or even their neighboring states. Well, yeah, they had high employment already...higher than the national average and higher than their neighboring states.

This is NOT to say America is doing fantastic. Government and cronies have thrown all kinds of sand in the gears of progress. Just pointing out how insanely misleading stats can be.
Posted by TigerDoc
Texas
Member since Apr 2004
11880 posts
Posted on 4/5/25 at 12:12 am to
The reason for underperforming the world is because China and India, the two fastest growing economies, together have over a third of world population and they’ve been moving from minimal economic production to moderate production. This is no reason for us to melt.
Posted by Powerman
Member since Jan 2004
173802 posts
Posted on 4/5/25 at 12:14 am to
God forbid developing nations catch up
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram