- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 1/16/25 at 10:17 am to Proximo
quote:
Roger wrong again, not surprising
If you cant handle yourself around women, thats on you.
Posted on 1/16/25 at 10:17 am to Lutcher Lad
I would fight next to Chavez any day. But I'm not military my son is. He's not a fan of women in combat.
Posted on 1/16/25 at 10:18 am to Lutcher Lad
Having been in a state of hand to hand combat with women for years now, I think they are eminently qualified and in fact have strategic advantages that men cannot even begin to grasp or resist. They have a specific trap that is nearly impossible to defend against and they also are soft and smell good.
Posted on 1/16/25 at 10:18 am to Scruffy
quote:
If they can meet the exact same standards as their male counterparts and the standards aren’t lowered to allow for this.
This is the only way. Period.
Posted on 1/16/25 at 10:21 am to Vacherie Saint
As my combat vet (Korea) Dad said more than once, yeah, that's great for those guys who are getting laid, but what about the ninety percent who aren't?
Posted on 1/16/25 at 10:23 am to Lutcher Lad
Anyone who even entertains a fleeting thought about women in combat have absolutely no clue about the military.
Posted on 1/16/25 at 10:33 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
quote:
Roger wrong again, not surprising
If you cant handle yourself around women, thats on you.
Nope. This is about understanding how inserting a young woman into a group 18 - 30 year old young men who have been selected, trained, and mentally conditioned to function effectively as a unit in the most testosterone-fueled, stressful, extreme conditions that humans experience.
Seriously, if you've never been in that environment, just shut the frick up because you don't understand how it works.
Posted on 1/16/25 at 10:34 am to Lutcher Lad
Do they have to sign up for the SSA like I did when I turned 18?
Posted on 1/16/25 at 10:35 am to Lutcher Lad
Our strongest women are weaker than all of our enemies male soldiers. We should only send our strongest and best. End this crazy wokeness.
This post was edited on 1/16/25 at 12:52 pm
Posted on 1/16/25 at 10:35 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
If you cant handle yourself around women, thats on you.
tell me about your experience in the military with females
Posted on 1/16/25 at 10:37 am to SoFla Tideroller
quote:
Anyone who even entertains a fleeting thought about women in combat have absolutely no clue about the military.
100%
anyone who thinks women should be in combat roles doesn't know shite about operational readiness and their opinions should absolutely be disregarded as nonsense and ignorant.
Posted on 1/16/25 at 10:39 am to Lutcher Lad
No
Posted on 1/16/25 at 10:43 am to Lutcher Lad
It could work. Women have used 'violent PMS' in court as a defense when being charged with murder. If they synchronize their cycle the commander could check the calendar and see when they are about to explode. Then, give them weapons, point them to the enemy front and yell: 'Those men said you are fat, ugly and stupid! Go kill them!
This post was edited on 1/16/25 at 3:01 pm
Posted on 1/16/25 at 10:44 am to FightinTigersDammit
also consider women enduring capture and torture at the hands of the enemy. are they psychologically cold enough to take it?
Posted on 1/16/25 at 10:44 am to Lutcher Lad
As a woman, I think I should have the freedom to choose IF I want to serve my country in the military, and IF I want to serve in a combat role.
BUT, I shouldn't be allowed to do so by changing/lowering standards. IF I can't compete with my peers (male and female) then I have no business being in the military or any other field. I have no wish to be an AA/DEI puppet.
BUT, I shouldn't be allowed to do so by changing/lowering standards. IF I can't compete with my peers (male and female) then I have no business being in the military or any other field. I have no wish to be an AA/DEI puppet.
Posted on 1/16/25 at 10:45 am to Lutcher Lad
They don't belong in the fire dept and in most police jobs either.
Posted on 1/16/25 at 10:45 am to Night Vision
A blanket statement like that is dumb. See my post above!
Posted on 1/16/25 at 10:47 am to Vacherie Saint
Ever get into an argument with a woman where you were right? How many times did she cry?
Posted on 1/16/25 at 10:48 am to Scruffy
quote:
If they can meet the exact same standards as their male counterparts and the standards aren’t lowered to allow for this.
This is truth, but not reality. I can't think of any job that is considered a predominantly male based profession that hasn't lowered their standards to allow women to be hired.
I know for a fact the N.O.F.D. and N.O.P.D. lowered their physical standards to give women applicants a better chance of being hired.
Put them on the job, but not in actual patrol work or front line firefighting.
Page 5 of 10
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News