Started By
Message

re: Wisconsin judge says she can't be charged

Posted on 5/14/25 at 3:42 pm to
Posted by RockyMtnTigerWDE
War Damn Eagle Dad!
Member since Oct 2010
108959 posts
Posted on 5/14/25 at 3:42 pm to
Her attorney isn’t some fat schmuck from LA who is slow no fro and hardly a pro is it?
Posted by Great Plains Drifter
Flyover, U.S.A.
Member since Jul 2019
9867 posts
Posted on 5/14/25 at 3:44 pm to
Too many people throughout our various government branches seem to genuinely believe they are immune from any accountability or even oversight.



Posted by crash1211
Houma
Member since May 2008
3710 posts
Posted on 5/14/25 at 3:47 pm to
quote:

They just need to bring back the ole patty wagon's and start rounding up these liberal judges that just make up the rules as they go. Biden isn't president anymore


I was thinking more like this

Posted by RCDfan1950
United States
Member since Feb 2007
39631 posts
Posted on 5/14/25 at 3:48 pm to
So she is declaring her Courtroom as a ‘Sanctuary Courtroom”, immune to external law? Took em’ a while to come up with that bs.
Posted by CAD703X
Liberty Island
Member since Jul 2008
93232 posts
Posted on 5/14/25 at 3:49 pm to
quote:

she enjoys legal immunity for official acts she performs as a judge
now do former presidents of the united states
Posted by Jake88
Member since Apr 2005
79906 posts
Posted on 5/14/25 at 3:50 pm to
quote:


This can't be real, is it?
Is an attorney involved, then, yes.
Posted by TrueTiger
Chicken's most valuable
Member since Sep 2004
82301 posts
Posted on 5/14/25 at 3:51 pm to

I'll give her attorneys an 'A' for effort.
Posted by RT1941
Member since May 2007
32062 posts
Posted on 5/14/25 at 3:52 pm to
quote:


I didn't realize she was a president.
She/he serves a dual purpose as judge and logistical traffic coordinator in her/his courtroom.

Is judge a trans? Give it a 55+ yr old male haircut and well....
Posted by Trauma14
Member since Aug 2010
6555 posts
Posted on 5/14/25 at 3:54 pm to
Well, her actions were not protected under judicial immunity. Her judicial case with him was strictly a domestic abuse case. Then she decided to aid and abet a fugitive for federal crimes. Not her job as a state county circuit judge. She gets no immunity.
This post was edited on 5/14/25 at 3:55 pm
Posted by TigerCoon
Member since Nov 2005
22468 posts
Posted on 5/14/25 at 3:55 pm to
.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
476467 posts
Posted on 5/14/25 at 3:57 pm to
quote:

This can't be real, is it?

This is what you call a clever argument.
Posted by Trauma14
Member since Aug 2010
6555 posts
Posted on 5/14/25 at 3:59 pm to
quote:

This is what you call a clever argument.



More like a Hail Mary.
Posted by roadGator
DeBoar’s dome
Member since Feb 2009
157679 posts
Posted on 5/14/25 at 3:59 pm to
quote:

attorney involved


Scum bags
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
476467 posts
Posted on 5/14/25 at 4:01 pm to
quote:

More like a Hail Mary.


Using the word clever isn't a compliment.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
476467 posts
Posted on 5/14/25 at 4:02 pm to
quote:

Scum bags

She's accused of felony charges. You think a Constitutional right like defense to criminal charges deserves that sort of language?
Posted by Great Plains Drifter
Flyover, U.S.A.
Member since Jul 2019
9867 posts
Posted on 5/14/25 at 4:07 pm to
quote:

This is what you call a clever argument.


Hmmmm. “Clever” might be one of those in the eye of the beholder descriptors in this situation.
Posted by roadGator
DeBoar’s dome
Member since Feb 2009
157679 posts
Posted on 5/14/25 at 4:07 pm to
You can argue lawyers in general aren’t scum bags if you like but I’ve seen Suits.
Posted by Barneyrb
NELA
Member since May 2016
7217 posts
Posted on 5/14/25 at 4:08 pm to
Yeah, Bula Ballbreaker is gonna like her in prison
Posted by UncleFestersLegs
Member since Nov 2010
16879 posts
Posted on 5/14/25 at 4:10 pm to
quote:

Her next claim is that she has ruled the law of gravity to be racist and unconstitutional.
does this mean that we are going to float?
Posted by This GUN for HIRE
Member since May 2022
6062 posts
Posted on 5/14/25 at 4:10 pm to
This is not surprising. What else could she argue?
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram