Started By
Message

re: Why would Maricopa County have a Republican voter heat map on the wall?

Posted on 12/15/22 at 4:06 am to
Posted by ChineseBandit58
Pearland, TX
Member since Aug 2005
49525 posts
Posted on 12/15/22 at 4:06 am to
quote:

the fact they've got both Dem and GOP maps doesn't make it any less odd and questionable.

tru dat - this is iron-clad evidence of 'gasp' partisan planning going on within the very guts of the 'free and fair' election administrators.

At least there should be some 'explanation' of its presence.
Posted by Roaad
White Privilege Broker
Member since Aug 2006
83979 posts
Posted on 12/15/22 at 4:25 am to
quote:

This was already confirmed not a Democrat map.
link?
Posted by Roaad
White Privilege Broker
Member since Aug 2006
83979 posts
Posted on 12/15/22 at 4:27 am to
quote:

Proof?

He said "confirmed"

So, obviously it's true
Posted by jp4lsu
Member since Sep 2016
6770 posts
Posted on 12/15/22 at 6:09 am to
I agree this is pretty strange, but it does look like a Dem heat map next to it. It is the same map but blue.

With that said, it is really unnecessary to have both. Just collect the votes and don't worry about what precincts you have left and what demo or party dominates that precinct.
Posted by CelticDog
Member since Apr 2015
42867 posts
Posted on 12/15/22 at 6:44 am to
quote:

least there should be some 'explanation' of its presence.


read the full thread.
there is.

and early in thread someone correctly states that there is a democrat map too.
but a poster immediately MISTAKENLY states that there is no democrat map.
possible honest mistake but more likely to be of the same cloth as those who originated this "story" whose intention is to rile up and is intentional because so easy to find the factual full story. so did the one who mistakenly claims no democrat map believe that or was that more of intentional riling up?
So the thread goes on, until someone clips in the facts, which you didn't read.
This post was edited on 12/15/22 at 6:54 am
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
138899 posts
Posted on 12/15/22 at 6:49 am to
quote:

and early in thread someone correctly states that there is a democrat map too.
das macht nichts
quote:

What difference should partisan density make? How would knowing a precinct was heavily blue or red affect planning? I can understand general voter density being useful.

...the fact they've got both Dem and GOP maps doesn't make it any less odd and questionable.
Posted by CelticDog
Member since Apr 2015
42867 posts
Posted on 12/15/22 at 6:56 am to
quote:

das macht nichts



brushes aside the grievances of the entire claim of thread.

of course it matters.
read my reply to Chinese bandit 58.
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
138899 posts
Posted on 12/15/22 at 7:03 am to
quote:

of course it matters.
How?
How would knowing a precinct was heavily blue or red affect planning?
Again, the fact they've got both Dem and GOP maps doesn't make it any less odd and questionable.
Posted by SquatchDawg
Cohutta Wilderness
Member since Sep 2012
20088 posts
Posted on 12/15/22 at 7:32 am to
quote:

What difference should partisan density make? How would knowing a precinct was heavily blue or red affect planning? I can understand general voter density being useful. But that's bizarre, and the fact they've got both Dem and GOP maps doesn't make it any less odd and questionable.


Bingo.

If it is about access during Election Day overall voting density is all that would matter. That’s a bogus excuse.
Posted by burger bearcat
Member since Oct 2020
10501 posts
Posted on 12/15/22 at 7:39 am to
quote:

but a poster immediately MISTAKENLY states that there is no democrat map.


Let's set the semantics aside on this one. And say there was also a Democrat map.

You still have not articulated why a "non-partisan" government voting center would require partisan heat maps?

I'm not even alleging anything specific. The only information any of us know is that the maps do exist and they were in the government voting centers. Again, why?
Posted by BobBoucher
Member since Jan 2008
18743 posts
Posted on 12/15/22 at 7:39 am to
To call the election.
Posted by AggieHank86
Texas
Member since Sep 2013
44345 posts
Posted on 12/15/22 at 7:41 am to
That looks a great deal like the map that we spent 10 pages discussing three weeks ago.
Posted by dgnx6
Member since Feb 2006
89786 posts
Posted on 12/15/22 at 7:44 am to
quote:

Honest question - what does it matter?


You send bunk machines to those areas.

You make sure they don’t go to others.


Stop being so fricking naive.
Posted by dgnx6
Member since Feb 2006
89786 posts
Posted on 12/15/22 at 7:45 am to
quote:

Proof?


Proof it’s a democrat map?

Prof the vaccines are 100% safe and effective?

Posted by AggieHank86
Texas
Member since Sep 2013
44345 posts
Posted on 12/15/22 at 7:47 am to
quote:

You send bunk machines to those areas.
What is a “bunk machine?”
Posted by loogaroo
Welsh
Member since Dec 2005
42356 posts
Posted on 12/15/22 at 8:24 am to
quote:

You still have not articulated why a "non-partisan" government voting center would require partisan heat maps?


This is all that matters. Dems should be equally pissed a republican controlled Maricopa BOS allowed maps of Dem areas in there, if that’s what they are.
Posted by La Place Mike
West Florida Republic
Member since Jan 2004
31402 posts
Posted on 12/15/22 at 8:36 am to
I would like to see the maps super imposed. It looks like "hot" area over lap.
Posted by Deplorableinohio
Member since Dec 2018
7921 posts
Posted on 12/15/22 at 8:46 am to
Can’t read? Get a GED.
Posted by Willie Stroker
Member since Sep 2008
16650 posts
Posted on 12/15/22 at 9:09 am to
quote:

What difference should partisan density make? How would knowing a precinct was heavily blue or red affect planning? I can understand general voter density being useful.

If I was blissfully unaware of the most recent accusations of frickery, I would speculate that a fairness minded organization would make an effort to know partisan density as a subcategory of overall voter density simply to be hyper-sensitive to possible accusations of frickery to minimize the possibility of partisan regions making credible claims of neglect for their region.

I do this in my current job. There are regions that are more prone to “because we’re black” reasoning. Ignoring their group representation is perceived as neglect even when overall numbers might drive a different strategy.

Belief is a stubborn thing.
Posted by CelticDog
Member since Apr 2015
42867 posts
Posted on 12/15/22 at 9:16 am to
quote:

nobody has explained how any of these three maps could be used to promote fraud.


shocking. blobs.
Jump to page
Page First 2 3 4 5 6 ... 10
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 10Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram