- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Why don't more citizens have a stockpile of missiles at home?
Posted on 8/8/19 at 10:50 am to T
Posted on 8/8/19 at 10:50 am to T
quote:Because cocksuckers like you have made them either illegal or prohibitively expensive. I should be able to own as many stingers as I want.
Why don't more citizens have a stockpile of missiles at home?
1
Posted on 8/8/19 at 10:50 am to T
quote:
still waiting on an answer
Then it's because you're a stupidass.
Posted on 8/8/19 at 10:54 am to GeauxxxTigers23
Takes up very little room and covered under the 2nd ammendment
Posted on 8/8/19 at 10:54 am to T
Generally, if it comes to war here at home, both sides would be idiots, to use weapons that would take out vital infrastructure. We are all going to need it, no matter who wins.
Thinking that a civil war in the U.S. at this time would be similar to other civil wars in other places, is really stupid.
There is a huge disconnect between the intellectuals, and the people who can actually get things done.
The military didn't build their own shite. Think about that.
Thinking that a civil war in the U.S. at this time would be similar to other civil wars in other places, is really stupid.
There is a huge disconnect between the intellectuals, and the people who can actually get things done.
The military didn't build their own shite. Think about that.
Posted on 8/8/19 at 10:54 am to T
quote:
missiles would be much more efficient than an AR when it comes time to protect yourself
I don’t think you know what ‘efficient’ means.
Posted on 8/8/19 at 10:55 am to T
quote:
covered under the 2nd ammendment
Wrong
Posted on 8/8/19 at 10:56 am to T
Low
quote:
T
Posted on 8/8/19 at 10:57 am to T
quote:
Takes up very little room and covered under the 2nd ammendment
What part of “prohibitively expensive” do you fail to understand?
Oh wait...never mind. Those are big words and you’re a retard.
This post was edited on 8/8/19 at 10:58 am
Posted on 8/8/19 at 10:58 am to T
If every person in Venezuela had a gun (instead of none of them having guns due to confiscation) do you think the bus driver would still be dictator?
Posted on 8/8/19 at 10:58 am to T
And the cost of a new vehicle.
And I don't speak Persian.
And I don't speak Persian.
Posted on 8/8/19 at 10:58 am to T
quote:
T
don't post again unless it's screenshots of the tough AR talk that you referenced earlier.
Unless you just admit to being a lying dumbass.
Posted on 8/8/19 at 11:00 am to T
quote:
It seems that missiles would be much more efficient than an AR when it comes time to protect yourself from the government. A lot of you talk tough about your AR-15s, but why not man up and get something to actually protect your family and home? It is your right to do so.
Welcome to the Libertarian Party!
Posted on 8/8/19 at 11:09 am to T
Any one who owns a firearm probably has at least a few missiles. They load these missiles into their firearm and it projects them at the target.
Posted on 8/8/19 at 11:09 am to T
quote:
It seems that missiles would be much more efficient than an AR when it comes time to protect yourself from the government.
If the shite hits the fan...
Our targets won't be the military, it'll be the politicians. Handheld firearms will work just fine against them.
Posted on 8/8/19 at 11:10 am to T
Good point. You know where I can pick up a few hellfires?
Posted on 8/8/19 at 11:27 am to T
I have 2 missles (well rockets, as they have no explosives) at home that can only be launched with approval from the faa, they are for recreational purposes. With an arduino and some time I could probably make them go where I wanted. Or relatively close.
Your point is we can’t fight the government but you’re wrong and you don’t even know why.
Your point is we can’t fight the government but you’re wrong and you don’t even know why.
This post was edited on 8/8/19 at 11:34 am
Posted on 8/8/19 at 11:32 am to T
quote:
It seems that missiles would be much more efficient than an AR when it comes time to protect yourself from the government. A lot of you talk tough about your AR-15s, but why not man up and get something to actually protect your family and home? It is your right to do so.
I see you're also a fan of enacting common sense gun legislation by repealing the 1934 NFA.
Posted on 8/8/19 at 11:33 am to T
Missiles are a tool of foreign policy to project power to distant places. Your strawman is straw.
Posted on 8/8/19 at 11:35 am to T
You can’t spell shite For Brains without T
Posted on 8/8/19 at 11:37 am to T
What a dumb thread.
Hell I'd try to buy a tank of I could afford one.
Hell I'd try to buy a tank of I could afford one.
Page 2 of 4
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News