- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Why did the Union not allow the Confederacy to secede without a war?
Posted on 5/17/26 at 8:55 am to TulsaSooner78
Posted on 5/17/26 at 8:55 am to TulsaSooner78
quote:It was an opportunity which Lincoln was not going to let go to waste.
They briefly discussed the question of why the Union did not just allow the Confederacy to secede without going to war. They did not provide any definitive answer.
There was also a misguided perception by the North, including Lincoln, that the "rebellion" could be put down quickly.
The South was similarly misguided in its perception that the war was winnable.
Posted on 5/17/26 at 9:04 am to themunch
quote:
They wanted that damn COTTON
Imagine The Fed taxing and stealing money from States? Who knew…
Posted on 5/17/26 at 9:05 am to NC_Tigah
quote:
There was also a misguided perception by the North, including Lincoln, that the "rebellion" could be put down quickly.
Sherman knew better and said so. People thought he was crazy.
Posted on 5/17/26 at 9:09 am to TulsaSooner78
I'm lucky to be here. My second great-grandfather was in the 18th Mississippi Cavalry Regiment under Forrest. By the end of the war, there were only a few officers and men remaining.
This post was edited on 5/17/26 at 9:21 am
Posted on 5/17/26 at 9:11 am to TulsaSooner78
Bloodthirsty savages
The same thing they did to the Indian nations
The same thing they did to the Indian nations
Posted on 5/17/26 at 9:12 am to coolpapaboze
quote:
The UK was a better trading partner for the southern states at that specific point in time. It was farther along in the industrial revolution and needed cotton for its textile industry.
The podcast I listened to referenced this.
Slavery had been abolished in England in 1772, and across most of their empire by 1843.
So trade with the Confederacy with a moral dilemma for the British.
Posted on 5/17/26 at 9:15 am to TulsaSooner78
South was dumb enough to fire the first shot and take Fort Sumter.
Posted on 5/17/26 at 9:18 am to TulsaSooner78
The civil war was about slavery similar to Iraq II was about terrorism/freedom.
Both labels garnered emotional and real support, but there were definitely ulterior and more concrete motives.
Both labels garnered emotional and real support, but there were definitely ulterior and more concrete motives.
Posted on 5/17/26 at 9:19 am to Beau Fontenot
quote:Likewise for Sam Houston who firmly believed that the South had no chance of winning a civil war against the North.
Sherman knew better and said so. People thought he was crazy.
In fact, Houston's prophetic warnings about what a war would actually look like, cost him his political career.
Posted on 5/17/26 at 9:19 am to RobbBobb
quote:
Bloodthirsty savages
The tales of devastation in the Mississippi Delta and of course in Georgia are appalling. In some cases, they'd give the woman of the house 45 minutes to remove their belongings before burning their homes. But Sherman understood that to defeat the South, it meant taking the war to its people. And he did with no mercy.
Posted on 5/17/26 at 9:20 am to TulsaSooner78
quote:
Why did the Union not allow the Confederacy to secede without a war?
The OG “Better Together” BS.
Posted on 5/17/26 at 9:25 am to BFIV
quote:
And here we go!
Another Civil War thread
Posted on 5/17/26 at 9:26 am to TulsaSooner78
quote:
Why did the Union not allow the Confederacy to secede without a war?
It was Lincoln’s opportunity to centralize power. He knew they had the right to secede but did not want an economic enemy that close. He recognized it was not sustainable. So…centralize power and secure long term economic power.
Posted on 5/17/26 at 9:32 am to TulsaSooner78
Money.
The North depended upon a tariff protected market in the South. Without the tariffs the South would have traded a great deal more with Britain for cheaper manufactured goods and a cheaper world supply.
And the vast majority of government revenue was paid by the South for the betterment of the North.
As dishonest Abe said, “A divided house cannot stand.”
The North depended upon a tariff protected market in the South. Without the tariffs the South would have traded a great deal more with Britain for cheaper manufactured goods and a cheaper world supply.
And the vast majority of government revenue was paid by the South for the betterment of the North.
As dishonest Abe said, “A divided house cannot stand.”
This post was edited on 5/17/26 at 12:29 pm
Posted on 5/17/26 at 9:34 am to TulsaSooner78
quote:
So trade with the Confederacy with a moral dilemma for the British.
The British had a moral dilemma in the 1800s because they desired more favorable trade deals? I think all nations had flexible morals when it came to favorable trade deals back then. It’s not like there was a team of independent journalists that would catch a flight to a foreign land to investigate and write a moral hit piece.
Posted on 5/17/26 at 9:37 am to Willie Stroker
One of the key facts that always stands out to me is that Lincoln I don’t believe was even featured or available on the ballot in many southern states. Yet he still won. Any Southern political power that was believed to be had was completely exposed.
The civil war was the true beginning of the end of states rights and the creation of the Goliath federal government.
The civil war was the true beginning of the end of states rights and the creation of the Goliath federal government.
Posted on 5/17/26 at 9:37 am to 14&Counting
quote:
Another Civil War thread
The War is like a ghost that still roams the South. As Shelby Foote said, Southerners have a unique identity in America in that we are the only Americans that are also a defeated people. I think the resentment and scar of that affair still lingers in our collective culture.
As a young boy growing up in the 60's, I can still hear my grandmother using the term "scallywag" when referring to Northerners. I have fond memories of going to Shiloh Military Park, and in the gift shop, every young boy made a choice. You either bought the grey or blue kepi.
I spent a lot of time studying it as a history major, and now my daughter teaches it as a college professor.
Posted on 5/17/26 at 9:41 am to TulsaSooner78
The north didn’t want the south selling cotton to England as it would have crippled their mills/industry.
Tariffs came along to prevent the southern relationships with England and Europe. The South didn’t have the same representation in congress, due to population, to be able to shut them down.
Tariffs came along to prevent the southern relationships with England and Europe. The South didn’t have the same representation in congress, due to population, to be able to shut them down.
Posted on 5/17/26 at 9:43 am to NC_Tigah
quote:
Likewise for Sam Houston who firmly believed that the South had no chance of winning a civil war against the North.
In fact, Houston's prophetic warnings about what a war would actually look like, cost him his political career.
Correct. You obviously know his quote, " I tell you that, while I believe with you in the doctrine of states rights, the North is determined to preserve this Union. They are not a fiery, impulsive people as you are, for they live in colder climates. But when they begin to move in a given direction, they move with the steady momentum and perseverance of a mighty avalanche; and what I fear is, they will overwhelm the South."
Posted on 5/17/26 at 9:45 am to TulsaSooner78
Same reason your town wont let you secede your house the mailbox in front of your house and the sidewalk from the town by building a fence and not paying taxes.
No government in the world will let its property just leave... without a fight.
Except some really wimpy western Europeans.
Turkey is killing Kurds, Ukrainians killing Russians.
The question is why not, but why would.
If Alberta tries to secede they will need US support like Kosovo.
No government in the world will let its property just leave... without a fight.
Except some really wimpy western Europeans.
Turkey is killing Kurds, Ukrainians killing Russians.
The question is why not, but why would.
If Alberta tries to secede they will need US support like Kosovo.
Popular
Back to top



1






