Started By
Message

Why again is Bill Clinton not being prosecuted?

Posted on 12/20/25 at 10:33 am
Posted by tigerskin
Member since Nov 2004
44881 posts
Posted on 12/20/25 at 10:33 am
Seriously. For all the people on both sides that supposedly want the truth. What are we waiting for? Bring him in
Posted by Great Plains Drifter
Flyover, U.S.A.
Member since Jul 2019
8747 posts
Posted on 12/20/25 at 10:36 am to
He’s part of the protected political class.

Same reasons an idiot like an Ilhan Omar can somehow become a multimillionaire within a flicker of time and no-one bats an eye.

DC and the establishment class will always protect DC.
Posted by SallysHuman
Lady Palmetto Bug
Member since Jan 2025
14581 posts
Posted on 12/20/25 at 10:37 am to
Won't happen.

He'll die with his legacy a little tarnished with more than half the citizenry not even caring- either because of tribalism or because of how long ago it was.
Posted by dgnx6
Member since Feb 2006
86169 posts
Posted on 12/20/25 at 10:38 am to
Because no one really cares.

This was always about Trump.


Posted by OchoDedos
Republic of Texas
Member since Oct 2014
39408 posts
Posted on 12/20/25 at 10:38 am to
Statutes of Limitations have run. Most of this stuff happened 20-30 or more years ago. He could've been sued in Civil Court, but never was. Public shaming never expires
Posted by Jugbow
Member since Nov 2025
1470 posts
Posted on 12/20/25 at 10:38 am to
Posted by SloaneRanger
Upper Hurstville
Member since Jan 2014
12823 posts
Posted on 12/20/25 at 10:44 am to
Is there an accuser? Because without that there is no case.
Posted by paulb52
Member since Dec 2019
7439 posts
Posted on 12/20/25 at 10:46 am to
Because he’s married to Hillary. Clinton’s are immune from prosecution.
Posted by FMtTXtiger
Member since Oct 2018
4980 posts
Posted on 12/20/25 at 10:54 am to
no one has the balls to take action on anyone. I wish this crap was over b/c MAYBE we can focus on something the government MAYBE would change for the better.

Posted by VOR
Member since Apr 2009
67524 posts
Posted on 12/20/25 at 10:57 am to
quote:

Seriously. For all the people on both sides that supposedly want the truth. What are we waiting for? Bring him in


Serious question. Prosecuted for what specific criminal offense?
Posted by RelentlessAnalysis
Trumpist Populism: Politics by LCD
Member since Oct 2025
2038 posts
Posted on 12/20/25 at 10:58 am to
quote:

Why again is Bill Clinton not being prosecuted?
Prosecuted for what?

I suspect that you are talking about "contempt of Congress" related to scheduling his Committee deposition.

The answer to that question is "Because this is how the scheduling of a Committee deposition for a busy, prominent person often takes place." He has now been warned that the Committee will pursue contempt sanctions if he does not appear for the new date, and I have no doubt that he will appear as scheduled.
This post was edited on 12/20/25 at 11:01 am
Posted by Y.A. Tittle
Member since Sep 2003
109721 posts
Posted on 12/20/25 at 10:59 am to
quote:

Statutes of Limitations have run. Most of this stuff happened 20-30 or more years ago. He could've been sued in Civil Court, but never was.


I mean, if we are actually talking sexual abuse of minors, this is not necessarily true.
Posted by 844_Tiger
Down_Under
Member since Jul 2021
246 posts
Posted on 12/20/25 at 11:00 am to
Because the deep state will protect itself.
Think about it from an organizational point of view. Let's pretend that you are part of a select group of people who wield power within an organization: the upper management. You know the guys in that organization that may be doing shady shite with the expenses, who is banging the secretary , who is having an affair, etc.
Would you rat them out to HR? Think about what that means; it means that you have a uphill battle against your own peers, you will be perceived as a turncoat on the group and your power may be diminished, you may be fired and lose all power completely. And at the end of all that the folks that you ratted out may not even get punished, so what is the point of doing the morally correct thing if you will lose your status (and anyone in politics is obsessed with status) all for naught?
Add to that, the presidential pardon, which is a powerful de-motivator for being a rat. You stay quiet and your boy Trump, Biden, Clinton, etc gives you a get out of jail card for keeping quiet.
The incentives are just not there for most peccadilloes and crimes. Now, this may be different because it involves child abuse, which the American electorate will not tolerate. The key here is to make a solid case and prosecution against one little fish or a group of little fish that will start turning over the "big fish"
Posted by TDTOM
Member since Jan 2021
24758 posts
Posted on 12/20/25 at 11:02 am to
I haven’t t seen anything that implicates anyone yet.
Posted by shinerfan
Duckworld(Earth-616)
Member since Sep 2009
28150 posts
Posted on 12/20/25 at 11:03 am to
Were the girls he was pictured with underaged? Not all of Epstein's girls were. That big groupt of Epstein "victims" that kept doing press conferences weren't underaged when they worked for Epstein. They were just plain ole hookers.
Posted by tigerskin
Member since Nov 2004
44881 posts
Posted on 12/20/25 at 11:07 am to
Because the victims didn't want to get suicided by Hillary. There is a reason they want the government releasing this and not them.
This post was edited on 12/20/25 at 11:08 am
Posted by RelentlessAnalysis
Trumpist Populism: Politics by LCD
Member since Oct 2025
2038 posts
Posted on 12/20/25 at 11:09 am to
quote:

Statutes of Limitations have run. Most of this stuff happened 20-30 or more years ago. He could've been sued in Civil Court, but never was.
quote:

I mean, if we are actually talking sexual abuse of minors, this is not necessarily true.

Huh?

Epsteins girls were older teens, as I understand it. Yes, the SoL would be tolled (in most jurisdictions) while they were still minors, but that would toll THIS SoL for only a couple of years, not for 2-3 decades.
Posted by roadGator
Member since Feb 2009
154674 posts
Posted on 12/20/25 at 11:10 am to
Hank makes a good point.
Posted by RelentlessAnalysis
Trumpist Populism: Politics by LCD
Member since Oct 2025
2038 posts
Posted on 12/20/25 at 11:11 am to
quote:

fricking minors. Because that is what he did
quote:

We've seen zero proof that would stand up in court...

And even IF such evidence existed, the statute of limitations would have expired a LONG time ago.
Posted by BigEasy92
Member since Oct 2025
174 posts
Posted on 12/20/25 at 11:29 am to
Same reason Trump isnt?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram