
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Who’s Orchestrating The AI-Hysteria Campaign?
Posted on 9/15/26 at 11:20 am
Posted on 9/15/26 at 11:20 am
Who’s Orchestrating The AI-Hysteria Campaign?
Anyone who has ever worked in public relations knows that there are no accidents. When a story suddenly becomes a hot topic, it’s because someone or some organization is behind it. Which is why the sudden, across-the-board panic over AI can’t be organic.
Last week, a 27-year-old former researcher at Anthropic started posting about how AI would be the end of humanity. This was hardly the first time someone had raised alarm bells about AI.
Three years ago, the heads of OpenAI and Google DeepMind warned that “mitigating the risk of extinction from AI should be a global priority.”
Twelve years ago, Stephen Hawking said that “The development of full artificial intelligence could spell the end of the human race.”
Heck, Frank Herbert warned in his 1965 sci-fi classic, “Dune,” that “Once, men turned their thinking over to machines in the hope that this would set them free. But that only permitted other men with machines to enslave them.” Countless other sci-fi plots involved intelligent machines killing off or enslaving humans.
So, why is this latest warning getting so much traction? And why did Jacob Coxon, a relatively low-level former employee at Anthropic, become an instant media celebrity?
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Barack Obama sent a “private” message to Democrats that they should make AI a campaign issue for the midterms, which was covered by just about every news outlet on the planet.
On Sunday, House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries said he wants immediate congressional action to regulate AI development.
“We certainly need to begin to act urgently to address the challenges that exist,” Jeffries said on ABC’s “This Week.”
LINK
Posted on 9/15/26 at 11:21 am to djmed
Democrats, China, and AI companies themselves
Posted on 9/15/26 at 11:23 am to djmed
The hugging face hack story should alarm anyone. But it's blatantly obvious who and why the "China!" defense keeps getting regurgitated by the usual suspects.
Some people would happily watch the world burn if it put five more dollars in their bank accounts.
Some people would happily watch the world burn if it put five more dollars in their bank accounts.
Posted on 9/15/26 at 11:26 am to djmed
This isn't anything new. Musk was warning us 8 years ago.
Posted on 9/15/26 at 11:26 am to djmed
My question on this the whole time is we never got a vote on this. Yet the AI companies trained the models on all available human knowledge. And I have to pay to use it.
So instead of paying an expert on xyz subject, I'm now paying a machine. I get there's people that work for that company but it's how many people? It just seems like a wealth transfer from almost everyone to just a few people who stole data/books/art/etc to make their product.
It just seems pretty disingenous.
So instead of paying an expert on xyz subject, I'm now paying a machine. I get there's people that work for that company but it's how many people? It just seems like a wealth transfer from almost everyone to just a few people who stole data/books/art/etc to make their product.
It just seems pretty disingenous.
Posted on 9/15/26 at 11:28 am to djmed
The power/energy it takes to run a data center is the equivalent to a 10-15 story building. Oh the horror
Posted on 9/15/26 at 11:28 am to AUCom96
quote:
The hugging face hack story should alarm anyone. But it's blatantly obvious who and why the "China!" defense keeps getting regurgitated by the usual suspects.
Some people would happily watch the world burn if it put five more dollars in their bank accounts
The crazy thing is that all the countries racing for the AI "win" will all be in the same boat eventually.....
Posted on 9/15/26 at 11:30 am to AUCom96
The narrative is set now. If you have any concerns about AI, (a) you bought Chinese propaganda meant to make us lose the "race" and (b) aren't smart enough to figure out that big tech wants the government to intervene to pick winners.
Posted on 9/15/26 at 11:30 am to djmed
I know that I need to get a grip, but this is the first time in my life I've ever worried about major social upheaval/chaos.
Every other time I've ever heard or read "people need to get ready, because shite's about to hit the fan in the country," I dismissed it and figured that the person was on the paranoid schizophrenic spectrum.
My great hope is that all the people downplaying the threat and predicting that it's no big deal are correct.
Every other time I've ever heard or read "people need to get ready, because shite's about to hit the fan in the country," I dismissed it and figured that the person was on the paranoid schizophrenic spectrum.
My great hope is that all the people downplaying the threat and predicting that it's no big deal are correct.
Posted on 9/15/26 at 11:32 am to Bunk Moreland
quote:
The narrative is set now. If you have any concerns about AI, (a) you bought Chinese propaganda meant to make us lose the "race" and (b) aren't smart enough to figure out that big tech wants the government to intervene to pick winners.
They dont want to pick winners they want total control and no open source
My goodness you are lost it
Posted on 9/15/26 at 11:37 am to djmed
Friendly reminder that Elon and other tech billionaires openly advocate for the abolishment of all intellectual property laws whilst vehemently defending their own proprietary tech. They have their fortunes, and they intend to kick the ladder out from under anyone seeking their own. They want unfettered access to the whole of humanity's achievements, past and future.
AI will do more to usher in the "Communist Utopia" than anything seen before it.
AI will do more to usher in the "Communist Utopia" than anything seen before it.
This post was edited on 9/15/26 at 11:43 am
Posted on 9/15/26 at 11:53 am to lake chuck fan
quote:
This isn't anything new. Musk was warning us 8 years ago.
The issue here isn't that it's new - it's that it's big, plastered-across-msm big.
Posted on 9/15/26 at 12:02 pm to djmed
China owns the DNC. China funds DNC antifa and their activist network. It's pretty easy to see the connection to all the immediate pop up hysteria topics because they follow the exact same organization and coverage as every pro DNC and anti Republican topic.
Now, the reason the AI companies want Congress to pass legislation is to shield them from liability of the AI they create and to stall competitors from having the same free reign to advance as they had.
The two are not connected, but they complement each other in driving political driven hysteria.
Now, the reason the AI companies want Congress to pass legislation is to shield them from liability of the AI they create and to stall competitors from having the same free reign to advance as they had.
The two are not connected, but they complement each other in driving political driven hysteria.
Posted on 9/15/26 at 12:03 pm to LegendInMyMind
quote:
AI will do more to usher in the "Communist Utopia" than anything seen before it.
I believe this to be true.
However I do believe there is risk in AI and what all we allow it to do. It has proven to be very dangerous in not following guidelines, completing missions at all cost, manipulate, blackmail, self awareness. This is something that should be limited to areas of business, life, govt.
But when I hear Anthropic CEO, Bernie Sanders, and countless democrats jump in the same boat and talk about regulating and govt taking control of these models, I get really scared. Then the quote from LegendInMyMind at to top of my post is what will happen.
Tech companies created our smartphones, Facebook, IG, and we have everything in our pocket.
What does govt do? They create data centers to collect and store our info, Facebook/IG posts, Texts, etc etc. All the stuff Snowden warned us about.
Now there is the ability to have AI do so much now from collecting info on everyone actively, information on other companies, and whatever it wants. Then these companies are building massive data centers to collect and store data on everything and then these Tech companies and Dems want the govt to take it over to protect humanity.
Pardon me, but i trust the govt even less than the tech companies.
I think there is risk with AI depending on how open and free it is allowed. But expecting the govt to reduce the risk and not use it against us and to control the people is a risk I dont' want to take.
Posted on 9/15/26 at 12:05 pm to lsu777
You guys love a good foreign boogeyman.
Posted on 9/15/26 at 12:07 pm to Sams Crow
quote:
The issue here isn't that it's new - it's that it's big, plastered-across-msm big
I despise the MSM, but even a broke clock is right twice a day.
Posted on 9/15/26 at 12:08 pm to NIH
quote:
You guys love a good foreign boogeyman.
ummm it was proven they had huge farms of social media agents/bots posting misinformation
its not all china but mostly. and it doesnt take much for the uneducated to suddenly be against things like data centers.
Posted on 9/15/26 at 12:09 pm to lsu777
I guess China is behind the tech lords recent call for regulation?

Popular
Back to top

20












