re: Who’s Orchestrating The AI-Hysteria Campaign?

quote:

---

Was it hysteria in the 1930s when physicists started saying "it is entirely possible for a country in the very near future to produce a bomb capable of incinerating an entire city"?

---

quote:

---

Who’s Orchestrating The AI-Hysteria Campaign?

---

quote:

---

In February The Department of War didn’t just cancel a contract with Anthropic AI.

They treated Anthropic as a hostile vendor and forced the whole defense industrial base off Claude.

Anthropic wanted corporate veto power over defense weapon systems. The DOW rejected them.

Hegseth called it a " Supply-Chain Risk to National Security "

I find it funny that it's now Anthropic "sounding the alarm" on A.I. being too "powerful"

Anthropic isn't the good the guys. They are a company retaliating against the Trump administration for terminating their contract with the DOW.

Add the $90 million coming from China to fund anti AI data centers in America. We have a full blown colluding with the Chinese communist party to stall and slow down American innovation.

---

quote:

---

No wonder OpenAI delayed their IPO plans. Secondary shares are being offered at an implied $475 bn valuation, down roughly 44% from the $852 bn primary round earlier this year, that makes that $1 tn IPO look near impossible right now.

Hearing Anthropic is being offered around a $700 bn valuation on the secondary market, yet they’re still trying to pitch their IPO between $1 tn and $2 tn. Good luck with that.

We all know how flaky secondary markets can be, so make of it what you will.

---

quote:

---

RECOGNIZE THESE NAMES YOU DIRTBAG? THEY USED TO WORK FOR YOU NOW THEY WORK AT ANTHROPIC
Anthropic leadership are former Obama administration officials Mariano-Florentino Elizabeth Kelly Tarun Chhabra Ben Buchanan Teresa Carlson, Colin Crowell Christopher Fonzone Jeffrey Bleich

---

Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.

quote:

---

Transcript via Real Clear Politics:

SHANNON BREAM: Dario Amodei worries about the takeover of the internet by these AI agents. But he talks about China: “If we greatly restrain our AI capabilities in the belief China will do the same, and then China defects, A.I. could be so powerful that such a defection could lead to their geopolitical dominance.” How do you measure these imbalances?

MOLLIE HEMINGWAY: First of all, Dario Amodei runs an AI company, but if he really believes these things, he has complete control.

SHANNON BREAM: That is what David Sacks, Just do it, you run the company, do it.

MOLLIE HEMINGWAY: It is an issue of our common Washington, D.C. People seek regulatory capture. You’ve made it to the top of the heap, and you want to keep everybody else out by regulating so the smaller competition companies cannot rise.

So this is particularly concerning for this particular issue because these six or seven top AI oligarchs are all massively aligned with the Democratic Party, the left. They want to make sure they have control for a post-Trump environment, so they can engage in ongoing censorship and control, and keep anybody else out for decades to come.

So it is totally legitimate to be concerned about AI. I myself am as well. But when you see a massive op like this going on, you have to wonder about precisely the motivation.

---