Started By
Message

re: What's the best argument against an all out AR ban?

Posted on 11/7/17 at 7:34 am to
Posted by ShreveportHog94
GodBlessAmerica
Member since Nov 2006
6036 posts
Posted on 11/7/17 at 7:34 am to
quote:

Every person in these photos are about to be gassed at Auschwitz in the summer of 1944. None of the people in these photographs lived to see the next day.


This happened because they didn't have access to ARs? Let me ask. Do you think Hitler conquered parts of Europe and massacred a race because he disarmed the citizens? It's important to see how you answer a long debunked theory on Nazi Germany.
Posted by FooManChoo
Member since Dec 2012
41870 posts
Posted on 11/7/17 at 7:35 am to
Heller decision.
Posted by Strannix
District 11
Member since Dec 2012
49166 posts
Posted on 11/7/17 at 7:38 am to
quote:

What's the best argument against an all out AR ban?


ShreveportHog94 being for one

quote:

Do you think Hitler conquered parts of Europe and massacred a race because he disarmed the citizens? It's important to see how you answer a long debunked theory on Nazi Germany.



Why didn't he invade and conquer Switzerland?
Posted by Strannix
District 11
Member since Dec 2012
49166 posts
Posted on 11/7/17 at 7:40 am to
quote:

Do you think Hitler conquered parts of Europe and massacred a race because he disarmed the citizens? It's important to see how you answer a long debunked theory on Nazi Germany.


Are you ready to get wreckt# bitch?

quote:

The 1938 Regulations Against Jews' Possession of Weapons, which came into force the day after Kristallnacht,[10][11] effectively deprived all Jews living under the Third Reich of the right to possess any form of weapons, including truncheons, knives, firearms and ammunition.[12] Before that, some police forces used the pre-existing "trustworthiness" clause to disarm Jews on the basis that "the Jewish population 'cannot be regarded as trustworthy'".[8]


So are you saying that the race that was slaughtered was banned from owning guns or not? What are you going to debunk stupidass shill cuck bitch.
This post was edited on 11/7/17 at 7:42 am
Posted by ShreveportHog94
GodBlessAmerica
Member since Nov 2006
6036 posts
Posted on 11/7/17 at 7:40 am to
quote:


Why didn't he invade and conquer Switzerland?



I already spiked the ball on you and all the other idiots who believe a theory debunked by every credible historian ever. No need to try to pick it up and get points, you've already lost.
Posted by Strannix
District 11
Member since Dec 2012
49166 posts
Posted on 11/7/17 at 7:42 am to
Were Jews banned from owning guns or not stupid frick?

Debunk it, melt melt melt
Posted by TrueTiger
Chicken's most valuable
Member since Sep 2004
68920 posts
Posted on 11/7/17 at 7:43 am to
quote:

Drugs are illegal but you can still buy weed and cocaine.


You already answered it.

If you think ARs are popular now, wait until you ban them.
Posted by JOJO Hammer
Member since Nov 2010
11948 posts
Posted on 11/7/17 at 7:44 am to
Not to long ago an attacker killed 86 people in France by running them down with an 18 wheeler. Now I ask you does the weapon of choice matter?

A guy in japan killed 19 with a knife. Again does the weapon of choice matter?

Oklahoma City a Tim McVeigh used uhaul truck loaded with fertilizer to blow up a federal courthouse. Kill roughly 168 people.

My point is if someone decided to go on a killing spree it doesn’t matter what he uses to kill he will find a way to kill.
Posted by Strannix
District 11
Member since Dec 2012
49166 posts
Posted on 11/7/17 at 7:45 am to
ShillportHog94
Posted by ShreveportHog94
GodBlessAmerica
Member since Nov 2006
6036 posts
Posted on 11/7/17 at 7:46 am to
quote:

If you think ARs are popular now, wait until you ban them.


So drugs would be used less if they were made legal? This thread has exceeded my expectations by a long shot.
Posted by TrueTiger
Chicken's most valuable
Member since Sep 2004
68920 posts
Posted on 11/7/17 at 7:49 am to
Utopia is not achievable. It doesn't exist.

If you think it is, you are about as batshit crazy as one of these recent shooters.

/thread
Posted by roadGator
Member since Feb 2009
141571 posts
Posted on 11/7/17 at 7:50 am to
Picking up another AR tomorrow. My bump stock is on back order though.


Posted by Strannix
District 11
Member since Dec 2012
49166 posts
Posted on 11/7/17 at 7:55 am to
quote:

ShreveportHog94



Did the 1938 Nazi gun laws ban jews from owning guns or not?
Posted by ShreveportHog94
GodBlessAmerica
Member since Nov 2006
6036 posts
Posted on 11/7/17 at 7:55 am to
quote:

Picking up another AR tomorrow. My bump stock is on back order though.


You getting a good deal? I need to get more ammo for all of mine. Shot a lot of rounds over the weekend.
Posted by Snipe
Member since Nov 2015
11202 posts
Posted on 11/7/17 at 7:56 am to
No argument needed.

The socialist gestapo is never getting our guns. There is too much history of the bad consequences of governments disarming its citizens.

Fix the problem, enforce the current laws, stop treating mental disorders like special cases to be celebrated and for God sake start punishing those who sit quietly by and hear people taking about doing these things and not getting involved. Oh and to balance things out, prosecute and imprison people who falsely claim that others are planning to commit violent acts. (i.e. Swatting)
Posted by roadGator
Member since Feb 2009
141571 posts
Posted on 11/7/17 at 7:56 am to
My neighbor owns the gun store. I don't get good deals. I get great deals.

Why haven't you turned in your AR yet?
This post was edited on 11/7/17 at 7:58 am
Posted by ShreveportHog94
GodBlessAmerica
Member since Nov 2006
6036 posts
Posted on 11/7/17 at 8:00 am to
quote:

Did the 1938 Nazi gun laws ban jews from owning guns or not?



You saying we could have won the great one by arming all the Jews in Germany!?! Holy smokes, Batman. Lol keep them coming. 6 millions Jews would have still died had every last one of them owned a personal firearm. It literally had zero to do with that - signed every person with common sense.
Posted by Clames
Member since Oct 2010
16733 posts
Posted on 11/7/17 at 8:00 am to
U.S. v Miller, 1939
D.C. v Heller, 2008
Caetano v Massachusetts, 2016

There will be no banning of the AR-type rifles. Only the uneducated think otherwise.
Posted by MrCarton
Paradise Valley, MT
Member since Dec 2009
20231 posts
Posted on 11/7/17 at 8:01 am to
quote:

You saying we could have won the great one by arming all the Jews in Germany!?! Holy smokes, Batman. Lol keep them coming. 6 millions Jews would have still died had every last one of them owned a personal firearm. It literally had zero to do with that - signed every person with common sense.


Nah.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
425838 posts
Posted on 11/7/17 at 8:08 am to
quote:

You saying we could have won the great one by arming all the Jews in Germany!?! Holy smokes, Batman.

no

and the Jews likely wouldn't have won

but at least they'd have been able to have a chance to defend themselves and slow the progress of the Nazis

quote:

Lol keep them coming. 6 millions Jews would have still died had every last one of them owned a personal firearm.

an armed population over a somewhat large area can do wonders, even against an amazing military power

see: Iraq, Afghanistan (about 50 times), the Revolutionary War, etc

again, they likely wouldn't "win" but they could have slowed down Germany and possibly created a stalemate

they'd have had a better shot if they were armed than not. i hope you can agree with that
Jump to page
Page First 4 5 6 7 8 ... 29
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 6 of 29Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram