Started By
Message

re: What's the best argument against an all out AR ban?

Posted on 11/7/17 at 4:40 am to
Posted by JamalSanders
On a boat
Member since Jul 2015
12135 posts
Posted on 11/7/17 at 4:40 am to
Better to be willfully ignorant than be proven wrong I guess.
Posted by Errerrerrwere
Member since Aug 2015
38329 posts
Posted on 11/7/17 at 4:42 am to
quote:

Better to be willfully ignorant than be proven wrong I guess


Yeah, let’s look to google for our understanding of the constitution, and claim victory afterwards!

Posted by JamalSanders
On a boat
Member since Jul 2015
12135 posts
Posted on 11/7/17 at 4:47 am to
quote:

Yeah, let’s look to google


Google is bad for a definition? Would you prefer Webster tell you the same thing?
Posted by TaderSalad
mudbug territory
Member since Jul 2014
24668 posts
Posted on 11/7/17 at 4:50 am to
quote:

What's the best argument against an all out AR ban?



Of the recent mass shootings, all of the shooters were disgruntled leftist. IF we're going to ban the platform, we should definitely ban the ideology as well.

Liberalism is a mental disorder
Posted by Errerrerrwere
Member since Aug 2015
38329 posts
Posted on 11/7/17 at 4:51 am to
quote:

Google is bad for a definition? Would you prefer Webster tell you the same thing?


Damn...if only our Supreme Court could have just used the definitions from Google and Webster’s when making their decision, huh?















































Wait...wait...











































fig.


Posted by tigger1
Member since Mar 2005
3476 posts
Posted on 11/7/17 at 4:58 am to
LINK


Every person in these photos are about to be gassed at Auschwitz in the summer of 1944. None of the people in these photographs lived to see the next day.

The little woods area shown in the photographs is the small woods just outside the gas chamber, these people are waiting their turn to take a shower (be gassed by Zyklon B).

Any question?
This post was edited on 11/7/17 at 5:05 am
Posted by BeeFense5
Kenner
Member since Jul 2010
41293 posts
Posted on 11/7/17 at 5:00 am to
Wow, Shreveport hog got merked in his own virtue signaling thread
Posted by JamalSanders
On a boat
Member since Jul 2015
12135 posts
Posted on 11/7/17 at 5:07 am to
quote:

Damn...if only our Supreme Court could have just used the definitions from Google and Webster’s when making their decision, huh?


So reading comprehension isn't your strong suit I take it.
Posted by GeauxxxTigers23
TeamBunt General Manager
Member since Apr 2013
62514 posts
Posted on 11/7/17 at 5:11 am to
I don’t need an argument.
Posted by Dead End
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2013
21237 posts
Posted on 11/7/17 at 5:42 am to
So, football and the Second Amendment are NOT your string suits.
Posted by 10MTNTiger
Banks of the Guadalupe
Member since Sep 2012
4139 posts
Posted on 11/7/17 at 5:55 am to
quote:

The second amendment has limits.


Show me in the constitution where those "limits" exist.
Posted by Wolfhound45
Hanging with Chicken in Lurkistan
Member since Nov 2009
120000 posts
Posted on 11/7/17 at 6:06 am to
quote:

ShreveportHog94
This was a lot funnier in your head.

As usual.
Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
99127 posts
Posted on 11/7/17 at 6:13 am to
"I'm retarded" - OP
Posted by offshoretrash
Farmerville, La
Member since Aug 2008
10178 posts
Posted on 11/7/17 at 6:16 am to
quote:

What's the best argument against an all out AR ban?


You can kill just as many if not more people with a 12ga shotgun loaded with #4 buckshot.
Posted by Wolfhound45
Hanging with Chicken in Lurkistan
Member since Nov 2009
120000 posts
Posted on 11/7/17 at 6:18 am to
quote:

What's the best argument against an all out AR ban?
The Bill of Rights.
Posted by Skeezer
Member since Apr 2017
2296 posts
Posted on 11/7/17 at 6:23 am to
Because people who don’t know ahything about firearms have no business banking them.
Posted by Themole
Palatka Florida
Member since Feb 2013
5557 posts
Posted on 11/7/17 at 6:26 am to
The second amendment has limits.


A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

This one?
Posted by jorconalx
alexandria
Member since Aug 2011
8630 posts
Posted on 11/7/17 at 6:28 am to
quote:

So rates of fire on the weapons are the same?


Posted by 10MTNTiger
Banks of the Guadalupe
Member since Sep 2012
4139 posts
Posted on 11/7/17 at 7:11 am to
Stephen Willeford is a pretty damn strong argument against it.
Posted by BlackPawnMartyr
Houston, TX
Member since Dec 2010
15343 posts
Posted on 11/7/17 at 7:17 am to
quote:


We need them to protect against tyrants that have access to F18s


I love this part bc it shows you are an idiot of history. This technology doesn't even win wars between nations much less civil.
This post was edited on 11/7/17 at 7:19 am
Jump to page
Page First 3 4 5 6 7 ... 29
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 29Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram