- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: What’s not being talked about in regards to the shooting
Posted on 1/8/26 at 8:22 am to AGGIES
Posted on 1/8/26 at 8:22 am to AGGIES
quote:
The new slow-mo video shows the cop had swiftly moved to the side of the car and the driver had already turned the wheels away from the cop and was attempting to drive away when she was shot.
Hey man, feel free to stand in front of my car as I pull forward into you and you tell me which way my tires are pointed at any given time ok?
Lets go!
0
Posted on 1/8/26 at 8:36 am to IvoryBillMatt
Dittie is a dumbass, let's see her expert commentary from the second angle.
Posted on 1/8/26 at 8:45 am to AGGIES
How could be moving away from the cop allow him put shots through the windshield
Posted on 1/8/26 at 8:57 am to RockyMtnTigerWDE
quote:
That a white person running from law enforcement and not following commands can be shot too?
You bring up a good point. Thank god she wasn’t black… at least we don’t have to go through that aspect as all this plays out.
This post was edited on 1/8/26 at 8:58 am
Posted on 1/8/26 at 9:24 am to AGGIES
quote:his life was in danger as soon as the lunatic stood on the gas and drove her vehicle directly at him before he had to swiftly elude the lunatic standing on the gas -
But his life was not in danger when he shot her.
bang - bang bang -
Posted on 1/8/26 at 9:26 am to deltaland
“being run over by a car”? The rhetoric becomes more ridiculous by the day…
The guy was able to step to the driver’s side window and shoot the woman again…
The guy was able to step to the driver’s side window and shoot the woman again…
Posted on 1/8/26 at 9:27 am to VOR
quote:
being run over by a car”? The rhetoric becomes more ridiculous by the day… The guy was able to step to the driver’s side window and shoot the woman again…
Did she use her car as a weapon? Simple yes or no answer, please.
This post was edited on 1/8/26 at 9:28 am
Posted on 1/8/26 at 9:29 am to AGGIES
quote:
No argument about her confrontational and uncooperative. But his life was not in danger when he shot her.
His life does not have to be in danger, even in slo mo. There has to be a reasonable determination that he fears for his life.
In real time, I have no doubt that fear was reasonable.
Posted on 1/8/26 at 9:30 am to AGGIES
quote:
It’s a factual statement to say the car was moving away from the cop when he fired his weapon.
So she was still in possession of the dangerous weapon she had just used to try to kill an officer? Got it. Thanks.
Posted on 1/8/26 at 9:32 am to AGGIES
quote:
But the legal argument for believing he was in imminent danger is flimsy if the vehicle was not even moving towards him.
Where did you get your legal training?
Posted on 1/8/26 at 9:34 am to IvoryBillMatt
Yeah, well life doesn’t move in frame by frame slow motion.
When a person exhibits the will to disobey a lawful order by law enforcement then no one knows what that person‘s next move is.
After she already showed aggressiveness wielding a deadly weapon then not only the safety of the officers are in play, but it also brings into play the safety of the general public at large. Then a split second a decision has to be made. The decision was forced by her and she is fully responsible for the outcome.
Doesn’t matter what your beef with law-enforcement is you don’t go messing around with an active law-enforcement operation.
When a person exhibits the will to disobey a lawful order by law enforcement then no one knows what that person‘s next move is.
After she already showed aggressiveness wielding a deadly weapon then not only the safety of the officers are in play, but it also brings into play the safety of the general public at large. Then a split second a decision has to be made. The decision was forced by her and she is fully responsible for the outcome.
Doesn’t matter what your beef with law-enforcement is you don’t go messing around with an active law-enforcement operation.
Posted on 1/8/26 at 9:34 am to BBONDS25
Bonds, I know you’re smarter than that.
C’mon man…
C’mon man…
Posted on 1/8/26 at 9:35 am to AGGIES
quote:
But his life was not in danger when he shot her.
People like this keep acting as if that cop was the only one there. Cops have a duty to protect other lives as well as their own.
Even if that cop was "not in danger," there were other police and civilians in the area. A cop can't take the risk that someone who tried to run him over would not also run over another cop or civilian.
These people literally think that cop was able to view the situation from multiple angles simultaneously, predict the criminal's future movements, and make a flawless decision all in less than a second. You people need to use common sense. Cops don't have superhuman abilities to slow time or be omniscient.
Posted on 1/8/26 at 9:35 am to Mid Iowa Tiger
quote:
The minute she put the car in gear and revved that engine she, and she alone, sealed her fate. If she wasn’t there at all, if she was merely protesting but not interfering, if she had obeyed the order to get out of the car, if she didn’t put the car in gear all would have had different outcomes. Those are the true factual statements.
And IF the officer wouldn't have put himself in the line of fire (in front of the vehicle), then we wouldn't be dealing with this shite-show. He wouldn't have stood in front of a person with a loaded weapon, why in the hell would he stand in front of a vehicle?
Posted on 1/8/26 at 9:38 am to Lou the Jew from LSU
quote:
His life does not have to be in danger, even in slo mo. There has to be a reasonable determination that he fears for his life.
I think many people are missing a big part of this, because I keep seeing the reference of him "fearing for HIS life". It's not just his life. It includes others. Once she disregarded his life, you have to take into account what she might do once she gets past him. He may have saved multiple lives yesterday. Once a person is deemed a threat, these officers are taught to fire until the threat is quashed. As long as she was behind that wheel, conscious, she was a threat. That's why he kept firing. Who is to say she wouldn't have aimed at another officer, or made a u-turn and come back after him?
Posted on 1/8/26 at 9:43 am to Enadious
quote:
And IF the officer wouldn't have put himself in the line of fire (in front of the vehicle), then we wouldn't be dealing with this shite-show. He wouldn't have stood in front of a person with a loaded weapon, why in the hell would he stand in front of a vehicle?
It’s called doing his job! He is a law enforcement officer. He was there upholding the law.
What an idiotic position “if cops just stop enforcing the law there will be no crime”.
Posted on 1/8/26 at 9:43 am to Mid Iowa Tiger
The fact that he was already on the side of the vehicle and not in front when he took the last headshot pretty much nullifies your point.
The idea that this foolish woman was a domestic terrorist is nonsense and an obvious lie…
The idea that this foolish woman was a domestic terrorist is nonsense and an obvious lie…
Posted on 1/8/26 at 9:45 am to Enadious
quote:
And IF the officer wouldn't have put himself in the line of fire (in front of the vehicle), then we wouldn't be dealing with this shite-show. He wouldn't have stood in front of a person with a loaded weapon, why in the hell would he stand in front of a vehicle?
Because they were trying to arrest her. She had escalated to the point of being arrested, but apparently she hadn't shown aggression. So he stood in front of her car so she couldn't escape arrest. But she chose to try to run him over. That's on her, not him.
Posted on 1/8/26 at 9:47 am to IvoryBillMatt
quote:
I don't agree this was murder---the agent feared for his life---but, this video breaks down the shot sequence well.
Though I despise these "protesters" (more paid NGO disruptors?) I don't like it either. Nor the "feared for his life" narrative.
I saw a few angles. The cop in question was incredibly careless and sloppy in his approach and own safety. Why isn't this being discussed? I saw his Quick Draw McGraw response as over-reaction (IF what we saw wasn't actually another psy-operation.)
The bottom line here -- JUST like the Derek Chauvin-knee "incident", we're going to have nationwide rebellions, calls for "justice" and chaos. (And perhaps the Martial Law excuse tPTB crave.)
Posted on 1/8/26 at 9:49 am to AGGIES
quote:
The new slow-mo video shows the cop had swiftly moved to the side of the car and the driver had already turned the wheels away from the cop and was attempting to drive away when she was shot.
Because life happens in slow motion and the agent wasn't already in fear of his life after being struck by a moving vehicle driven by a deranged libtard.
Y'all keep on grasping those straws though. We've ALL seen the videos and angles, and anyone with even a basic and rudimentary understanding of the law knows that this was a clean and justified shoot.
Page 2 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News