0
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 9/27/26 at 9:17 am to SlowFlowPro
I’m more than happy to keep the definition consistent with the one from macro economics class.
But yes, I think elites are involved in the nameless happenings that I’m referring to.
But yes, I think elites are involved in the nameless happenings that I’m referring to.
Posted on 9/27/26 at 9:17 am to SlowFlowPro
I don't want to get banned
Posted on 9/27/26 at 9:23 am to GreatLakesTiger24
I got you covered, but you don't have to say it out loud. NO worries
Posted on 9/27/26 at 9:24 am to SlowFlowPro
Globalism is not mere trade or diplomacy; it is an ideological assault on national sovereignty. It is the systematic transfer of lawmaking, economic control, and political power away from accountable, elected national governments and into the hands of unelected international bodies and multinational elites.
The globalist operates as a rootless technocrat who views traditional borders, distinct cultures, and citizen loyalty as inconvenient barriers to a homogenized, borderless economic zone. It subordinates the prosperity, security, and democratic self-determination of the local citizenry to the interests of transnational corporations and distant bureaucrats who bear none of the consequences of their policies.
The globalist operates as a rootless technocrat who views traditional borders, distinct cultures, and citizen loyalty as inconvenient barriers to a homogenized, borderless economic zone. It subordinates the prosperity, security, and democratic self-determination of the local citizenry to the interests of transnational corporations and distant bureaucrats who bear none of the consequences of their policies.
Posted on 9/27/26 at 9:41 am to Timeoday
quote:
Globalism is not mere trade or diplomacy; it is an ideological assault on national sovereignty.
Would you agree that abducting a country's leader or bombing it is an assault on their sovereignty?
Posted on 9/27/26 at 9:44 am to Bunk Moreland
Sure, what’s your point?
Posted on 9/27/26 at 9:49 am to udtiger
quote:
Desire for the weakening or elimination of sovereign borders
The people that desire this the most are the tech oligarchs who are in very close with Trump 2.0
quote:
Unfettered migration.
Agreed there
quote:
Placing international "interests" ahead of national interests.
Right. Like fighting expensive wars on behalf of Israel and the Saudis.
quote:
Climate change bullshite.
Doesn't really have anything to do with globalism IMO. But to the extent that it might climate disasters would lead to mass migration events so ignoring the climate is a good way to ensure that one of the things you don't want to happen actually happens.
Posted on 9/27/26 at 9:50 am to ReauxlTide222
A decent portion of this board has somehow twisted foreign intervention in Venezuela and Iran into some wild theory that it is opposing globalism. It's why SFP started this thread. This board 100% gets it when we meddle in eastern Europe -- that it's basically a neocon or globalist push to break up countries like Ukraine and Russia and take resources.
My position is that what we're doing now is essentially the same thing. I highly doubt the protests in Iran were organic. Nearly everyone here understands we probably ignited a coup in Ukraine in 2014 (this is one of the only things I disagree with SFP about, by the way) and nearly everyone here understands that we actually did run a coup in Iran in 1953.
My position is that what we're doing now is essentially the same thing. I highly doubt the protests in Iran were organic. Nearly everyone here understands we probably ignited a coup in Ukraine in 2014 (this is one of the only things I disagree with SFP about, by the way) and nearly everyone here understands that we actually did run a coup in Iran in 1953.
Posted on 9/27/26 at 9:54 am to Bunk Moreland
I think they don't see old-school colonialism as globalism. If you can successfully run a resource-extracting puppet government that you pretty nakedly control, then it represents the people (more or less).
Posted on 9/27/26 at 10:02 am to TigerDoc
That's been an interesting angle for the people who think the Venezuela op was a success. Have we really freed the people when a hardline Chavista government is still running things with a gun to their heads?
Posted on 9/27/26 at 10:08 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
What is your personal definition of "globalism" ?
Weighting international impact much more heavily than domestic impact on every domestic and international decision.
Posted on 9/27/26 at 10:11 am to Bunk Moreland
quote:You’re saying we’re the baddies so don't complain about the left(and people on the right who are helping them) doing what we think they’re doing here and in other western countries?
My position is that what we're doing now is essentially the same thing.
Posted on 9/27/26 at 10:12 am to Bunk Moreland
If they can define American control as freeing them, they can make that work.
This post was edited on 9/27/26 at 10:21 am
Posted on 9/27/26 at 10:21 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
What is your personal definition of "globalism" ?
How about you give yours first? Or clearly state that there is no such thing?
Your post is designed to make others offer an opinion, that you will then use to tell them how wrong and uninformed they are. This allows you to place yourself into a position of superiority - which is really a dbag move.
Posted on 9/27/26 at 10:24 am to ReauxlTide222
Bad is everywhere, especially when you are weak. I just hope and pray my baddies are the baddest of them all and are able to create good by removing the weaker baddies.
Posted on 9/27/26 at 10:33 am to Bunk Moreland
quote:
Would you agree that abducting a country's leader or bombing it is an assault on their sovereignty?
Only if said country's elected said leader fairly.
Posted on 9/27/26 at 10:37 am to Powerman
quote:
The people that desire this the most are the tech oligarchs who are in very close with Trump 2.0
Is that why Biden opened the borders and let in 10 million plus illegals? Because Trump's buddies wanted him too?
Posted on 9/27/26 at 10:38 am to SlowFlowPro
90% of this board:
Oppose any Trump policy - Globalist
Disagree with or make fun of Trump - Deep State
Communist
has TDS
rinse, repeat
Oppose any Trump policy - Globalist
Disagree with or make fun of Trump - Deep State
Communist
has TDS
rinse, repeat
Posted on 9/27/26 at 10:41 am to Nevada_Tiger
quote:
How about you give yours first? Or clearly state that there is no such thing?
Clearly you did not read OP. The first paragraph:
quote:
"globalism" often acts less like a fixed definition and more like an umbrella label whose meaning is supplied by the surrounding story/argument. The term can be used for an established policy-oriented usage and a conspiratorial usage centered on a purported hidden cabal. It's completely malleable and shifts with the speaker and conversation to create the perception of a boogeyman. In many cases I've seen the kernel of truth fallacy used for irrational extrapolation.
Page 2 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News