2
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: What is your personal definition of "globalism" ?
Posted on 9/27/26 at 1:00 pm to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 9/27/26 at 1:00 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Your dishonesty isn't helping you
Maybe I need to rethink whether you're trolling or not.
Posted on 9/27/26 at 1:03 pm to Azkiger
quote:
Sovereignty is the ability for a nation to govern itself. If you can't choose your own leader how are you governing yourself?
You're engaging in the same conflation and trying to define terms to get out of it. It's still the same conflation.
Now this is where your point has been refuted and you refuse to waive the white flag and engage in the ad homs you attempted earlier, I reckon.
That's your pattern
Posted on 9/27/26 at 1:03 pm to Azkiger
quote:
Maybe I need to rethink whether you're trolling or not.
I don't have a problem following discussions.
Posted on 9/27/26 at 1:03 pm to SlowFlowPro
You're free to offer up a counter definition.
Posted on 9/27/26 at 1:04 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
I don't have a problem following discussions.
Sure you do. You derail threads all the time.
Posted on 9/27/26 at 1:06 pm to Azkiger
quote:
Maybe I need to rethink whether you're trolling or not.
Of course he is, the guy doesn’t have an honest bone in his body
Posted on 9/27/26 at 1:08 pm to Azkiger
quote:
You're free to offer up a counter definition.
I already did when I explained your conflation.
You can't "define yourself out of the conflation"
While there is a tangential relationship in certain aspects of sovereignty and leadership, they are not the same concept. Sovereignty is an existential status of a state. The leaders of that state are transitory and, unless you're dealing with an autocrat, have little direct relationship with exerting the sovereignty of a state to which they're associated.
You're conflating the two.
Posted on 9/27/26 at 1:08 pm to Azkiger
quote:
Sure you do. You derail threads all the time.
Posted on 9/27/26 at 1:10 pm to SlowFlowPro
I give Azkiger credit. He has presented one of the wildest arguments I've ever seen on here. If a country has a leader by virtue of a rigged election, they no longer have sovereignty.
Posted on 9/27/26 at 1:12 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Sovereignty is an existential status of a state.
Thats not quite a definition.
Try again.
Posted on 9/27/26 at 1:14 pm to Bunk Moreland
quote:
I give Azkiger credit. He has presented one of the wildest arguments I've ever seen on here. If a country has a leader by virtue of a rigged election, they no longer have sovereignty.
It's even more nonsensical when you go back to my original post, and permit 2020-like insanity to determine that. It just adds another layer of irrationality akin to the problems in defining the term itself.
This is what they want, a mess of no definitions/distinctions to paint their masterpieces
Posted on 9/27/26 at 1:15 pm to Azkiger
quote:
Thats not quite a definition.
I don't need to define it further to show your conflation
My prophecy is being fulfilled
quote:
Now this is where your point has been refuted and you refuse to waive the white flag and engage in the ad homs you attempted earlier, I reckon.
I'm sure you're going to try to be Big-Brained and claim I'm not "following the conversation" now
Posted on 9/27/26 at 1:15 pm to Bunk Moreland
quote:
If a country has a leader by virtue of a rigged election, they no longer have sovereignty
For the third time, my question is:
"How can the removal of a nation's unelected leader be an attack on its sovereignty?"
No where in that do I say that rigged elections=absolutely zero sovereignty.
Posted on 9/27/26 at 1:16 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
I don't need to define it further to show your conflation
How can you prove conflating terms without defining said terms?
As I said, 80-85 IQ.
This post was edited on 9/27/26 at 1:17 pm
Posted on 9/27/26 at 1:17 pm to Azkiger
quote:
How can you prove conflating terms without defining said terms?
I defined them enough to show the conflation. I don't need to define them further.
quote:
As I said, 80-85 IQ.
Dunning Kruger Effect on display
Just because you don't understand it doesn't mean it isn't true. That's not my burden.
Posted on 9/27/26 at 1:19 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
I defined them enough to show the conflation. I don't need to define them further.
Yes you do. And there's a reason you're refusing to do so.
Posted on 9/27/26 at 1:20 pm to Azkiger
He can’t see it, he’s not smart enough. The irony is hilarious
Posted on 9/27/26 at 1:21 pm to Madking
quote:
He can’t see it, he’s not smart enough.
Yeah, I'm probably giving him too much credit
Posted on 9/27/26 at 1:23 pm to SlowFlowPro
I'll do the analysis for you
Is the statement "Sovereignty is a condition of existence of a state" true? Yes
Is the statement "A leader is a part of the government and transitory in terms of existence" true? Yes
Does this information show a distinction in the terms? Yes
Is trying to lump two distinct terms as the same concept conflation? Yes
Is the statement "Sovereignty is a condition of existence of a state" true? Yes
Is the statement "A leader is a part of the government and transitory in terms of existence" true? Yes
Does this information show a distinction in the terms? Yes
Is trying to lump two distinct terms as the same concept conflation? Yes
Posted on 9/27/26 at 1:23 pm to Azkiger
quote:
Yes you do. And there's a reason you're refusing to do so.
Nope. I just did the analysis you apparently lack the ability to do, for you
Page 5 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News