- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: What do we think RFK will actually do regarding our food?
Posted on 11/17/24 at 6:56 pm to Stagg8
Posted on 11/17/24 at 6:56 pm to Stagg8
quote:I'm not the one who made the original comment, but how does this work for you:
The point is… while arguing that nutritionists don’t know what they’re talking about, the fact is what you do know and trust about nutrition comes from science/nutritionists.
Vast swaths of the medical-health-industrial complex - doctors, nurses, nutritionists, dietitians etc. - are trapped in a doom loop of the bullshite conventional wisdom of the past 60 years. So, yes, while ultimately it's informed nutritionists/science which provides our info, the problem is, the vast majority of practitioners (including corrupted scientists perpetually on the take from big food/pharm) are nearly entirely captured.
Posted on 11/17/24 at 6:57 pm to Big Scrub TX
quote:
the vast majority of practitioners (including corrupted scientists perpetually on the take from big food/pharm) are nearly entirely captured.
Vast majority of practitioners? We talking healthcare providers or researchers (or both)? And in what realms/fields?
Posted on 11/17/24 at 7:01 pm to LSUSkip
quote:
Or, the government could just mandate that all of the harmful chemicals be taken out of food
The thing about gov mandates is they're often used for things we really like to keep or have.
They pick winners and losers and dont ever do things solely based on it being right or wrong.
This post was edited on 11/17/24 at 7:03 pm
Posted on 11/17/24 at 7:02 pm to RogerTheShrubber
I just want someone to explain to me how all of this is not leftism
Posted on 11/17/24 at 7:03 pm to RogerTheShrubber
That's the word mandate, use any term you like, it doesn't have to be a bad thing in this situation.
Posted on 11/17/24 at 7:04 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
I just want someone to explain to me how all of this is not leftism
Based on various conversations over the past week, I dont think it bothers them to be thought of as leftists anymore.
Posted on 11/17/24 at 7:06 pm to LSUSkip
quote:
Back to top
That's the word mandate, use any term you like, it doesn't have to be a bad thing in this situation.
Good luck having this government control not affect you negatively..
Because thats exactly what will happen.
People often use the term "slippery slope" and if you believe in one, we are absolutely on a steep one right here.
Posted on 11/17/24 at 7:17 pm to RogerTheShrubber
You want to breathe asbestos? Go right ahead.
The problem is you’re too short sighted to understand that our government AND corporations have been working hand in hand for decades to line each other’s pockets, grow in size and erode our rights.
RFK is literally trying to reform the institutions from within, which in turn gives the people more power over their own lives.
Get it?
The problem is you’re too short sighted to understand that our government AND corporations have been working hand in hand for decades to line each other’s pockets, grow in size and erode our rights.
RFK is literally trying to reform the institutions from within, which in turn gives the people more power over their own lives.
Get it?
Posted on 11/17/24 at 7:30 pm to Mushroom1968
One big impact he can have is exposing the pharma industry for their corruption and non transparency
For instance
It’s pretty widely believed that people who carry out mass shootings, are influenced by SSRI uptake inhibitors like Prozac etc.
The pharma industry is petrified that it’ll even be given a hearing.
Rfk can shed some light on it.
For instance
It’s pretty widely believed that people who carry out mass shootings, are influenced by SSRI uptake inhibitors like Prozac etc.
The pharma industry is petrified that it’ll even be given a hearing.
Rfk can shed some light on it.
Posted on 11/17/24 at 7:37 pm to SlidellCajun
quote:
For instance
It’s pretty widely believed that people who carry out mass shootings, are influenced by SSRI uptake inhibitors like Prozac etc.
A great example of the "kernel of truth" leading to faulty extrapolation (via replacing correlation with causation)
Posted on 11/17/24 at 7:43 pm to Sizzle_DAWG
quote:
The problem is you’re too short sighted to understand that our government AND corporations have been working hand in hand for decades to line each other’s pockets, grow in size and erode our rights.
That sounds like something right out of a populist dream.
So your answer is more govt control.
Posted on 11/17/24 at 7:46 pm to RogerTheShrubber
I just want to know that I'm eating actual oatmeal when I buy a box of oatmeal, and whether or not my bread is 4% yoga mat.
In a government where greed isn't the top order, things like this aren't an issue.
In a government where greed isn't the top order, things like this aren't an issue.
Posted on 11/17/24 at 7:49 pm to CitizenK
quote:
Most of the public hadn't seen any olive oil.
Olive oil has been readily available in the US for better than a century.
Posted on 11/17/24 at 9:30 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:The history of the human race is a direct affront to "natural evolution", Roger. The first humans to develop the empathy to give a few food scraps to wolves or eat a little less so their crippled father could make it another day were at odds with evolution. Humans have been defying natural selection for millennia. It's the reason we're kind of a big deal on this planet.
Saving incompetent people is how we got where we are. The nanny state is a direct afront to natural evolution.
This post was edited on 11/17/24 at 10:18 pm
Posted on 11/17/24 at 9:36 pm to Mushroom1968
He may be able to ban some of the more toxic food additives like the EU has done but nothing extreme.
And he will probably be more aggressive in labeling processed foods that have chemicals in them.
But your daily life wont change. It is still on you to make good or bad choices.
And he will probably be more aggressive in labeling processed foods that have chemicals in them.
But your daily life wont change. It is still on you to make good or bad choices.
Posted on 11/17/24 at 9:41 pm to TN Tygah
quote:
And their bread is WAAAAAY better.
Chocolate too. Food tastes so much better there.
Posted on 11/17/24 at 10:17 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
I imagine we could look up some old threads over super liberal areas regulating/banning things like, soda, and we will find some 180s.
Funny thing is via education and research, your opinions can change. I used to drink Mt Dew daily. Then switched to Diet Mt Dew because I wanted a “healthier option”. Then I learned about glycemic index and how artificial sweeteners actually impact you worse than true sugar. That was like 20 years ago.
Right before Covid and all through it I got much more aware of the impact of diet. None of this was taught in my nutritional classes back in college. I continue to enhance my knowledge base. There is no reason in the world we need high fructose corn syrup, processed seed oils and dyes in our food other than to make companies money.
Posted on 11/17/24 at 10:20 pm to texag7
quote:
So using way less ingredients will make the cost more? Please explain that one for the group
Explain how economies of scale won’t impact the healthier options. Now the market for healthy food coloring is limited. As it expands there will be more produced and prices will go down eventually.
Posted on 11/17/24 at 10:28 pm to Big Scrub TX
quote:
Vast swaths of the medical-health-industrial complex - doctors, nurses, nutritionists, dietitians etc. - are trapped in a doom loop of the bullshite conventional wisdom of the past 60 years. So, yes, while ultimately it's informed nutritionists/science which provides our info, the problem is, the vast majority of practitioners (including corrupted scientists perpetually on the take from big food/pharm) are nearly entirely captured.
This doesn't make any sense.
You guys have a corrupted notion of how much patients actually listen.
Posted on 11/17/24 at 10:54 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
I do. When he says there are only 3 ingredients in french fries in Europe yet there are 17 ingredients in fries in the States then just what the hell are we putting in our bodies that the government seems to be okay with?
quote:
The nanny state breeds idiocy.
Europe is self annihilating, do you want that too?
Hey frick off. Have you read the label on a box of cereal in the last 10 years? I don't know what any of this shite is and you don't either.
Popular
Back to top


2






