- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 3/24/23 at 7:52 am to Vacherie Saint
quote:
No one... not even Vance fricking Jones thinks this is legit.
Thinks what is legit, exactly?
quote:
The accusers are a pack of lying clowns, for crying out loud. Changing their stories left and right, perjuring themselves, getting thrown in jail. They screwed themselves.
The DAs case is likely based more in documentary evidence and not testimony
Posted on 3/24/23 at 7:52 am to TomShelby
quote:
You have some of the worst tds ever
He's so energized by the idea that he can somehow figure out a way to legally box Trump in. But, when Trump isn't even charged or the charges ultimately get laughed out of court, he'll go back to those singular statements that he never thought this was a strong case.
Posted on 3/24/23 at 7:53 am to NawlinsTiger9
quote:
Never question dear leader
About a 6 year old non story?
Posted on 3/24/23 at 7:53 am to SlowFlowPro
You really are a pro at being slow.
Posted on 3/24/23 at 7:54 am to moneyg
quote:
He's so energized by the idea that he can somehow figure out a way to legally box Trump in.
Wut
quote:
But, when Trump isn't even charged or the charges ultimately get laughed out of court, he'll go back to those singular statements that he never thought this was a strong case.
I'm literally on record saying this is a weak case likely tolled by the SOL
Posted on 3/24/23 at 7:54 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
You do realize a contingent of NPCs are trying to argue Cohen wasn't even repaid by Trump, right?
Those were the words of Cohen through his own attorney.
Posted on 3/24/23 at 7:55 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
The DAs case is likely based more in documentary evidence and not testimony
whose documents? The ones from the accusers and their lawyers saying that none of this ever happened? You are making my point.
Posted on 3/24/23 at 7:55 am to GumboPot
quote:
The contractual agreement between Cohen and Trump, if there was one, apparently did not define what constituted "legal services". It was probably a verbal agreement anyway. "I'll pay you $40K a month for legal services (outside of the campaign)." Trump thinks Michael making a payment to SD unbeknownst to Trump is part of the "legal services". Michael probably thinks the payment is above and beyond "legal services". Thus the dispute.
It will be argued (and was so by the feds against Cohen) the entire point of this loosely goosey arrangement was the exact plausible deniability we are seeing I'm real time.
Again, this fits right into the DAs theory
Posted on 3/24/23 at 7:55 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
That's the behaviors that the DA is alleging is fraudulent (Triggering the business records law).
Are you familiar with this Manhattan business records law? Is this a felony or misdemeanor? If guilty of NY or Manhattan business records law does this crime carry a prison sentence? What is the max prison sentence? Max fine?
Posted on 3/24/23 at 7:56 am to SlowFlowPro
I’ll worry about this when the Biden crime family is taken seriously.
Posted on 3/24/23 at 7:57 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
It will be argued (and was so by the feds against Cohen) the entire point of this loosely goosey arrangement was the exact plausible deniability we are seeing I'm real time.
Does Manhattan business records law disallow loosely goosey business arrangements?
Posted on 3/24/23 at 7:58 am to SlowFlowPro
Why are lawyers such slimey lib douchebags
Posted on 3/24/23 at 7:58 am to Drizzt
This thread is mental masturbation for a narcissistic lawyer. He's Lt. Daniel Kaffee right now, prosecuting the unwinnable case.
Posted on 3/24/23 at 8:01 am to Vacherie Saint
Analyzing the first case listed in a First Year Torts textbook would be a more compelling “intellectual exercise.”
Posted on 3/24/23 at 8:01 am to Vacherie Saint
quote:
whose documents?
Trump Org primarily, I reckon. And emails.
quote:
The ones from the accusers and their lawyers saying that none of this ever happened?
No the payments made to Cohen and emails discussing it all
Posted on 3/24/23 at 8:03 am to GumboPot
quote:
Are you familiar with this Manhattan business records law? Is this a felony or misdemeanor? If guilty of NY or Manhattan business records law does this crime carry a prison sentence? What is the max prison sentence? Max fine?
It is a misdemeanor that can be enhanced to a felony (if the record fraud was in furtherance of a crime).
The DA is going to have to tie the campaign stuff into the fraud to make it a felony. Indictable but unlikely to withstand even a motion to dismiss.
The misdemeanor would have been a much more legit attempt, BUT it's tolled by the Statute of Limitations.
Posted on 3/24/23 at 8:03 am to DaBike
quote:
I’ll worry about this when the Biden crime family is taken seriously.
The world is literally twisting the law on its ear to get Trump in trouble (again for the 900th time) over nothing, while The Bidens are caught taking money from the Chinese and allowing classified documents to be compromised. Its unreal. Why are we talking about Stormy Daniels right now?
Posted on 3/24/23 at 8:04 am to GumboPot
quote:
Does Manhattan business records law disallow loosely goosey business arrangements?
That's up for the jury (or judge, I'm not sure if NY does bench trials for misdemeanors like LA) to decide.
Posted on 3/24/23 at 8:05 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
I'm literally on record saying this is a weak case likely tolled by the SOL
Yes. And, you have hundreds of other posts like this attempting to justify the charges against Trump.
You have TDS. But, your narcissism forces you to make blatant statements that you can fall back on when you inevitably are proven wrong.
It's very much like your Omicron fear. You probably had hundreds of posts talking about how hospitals would be overrun, how those who are unvaccinated should be held civilly liable, etc. But, you fall back on a singular statement where you acknowledge that Omicron may in fact be mild.
The sum of your posts (even with your on record admission of this being weak) is an embarrassing display of TDS with an embarrassing legal argument.
Page 3 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News