- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 2/26/26 at 2:26 pm to Ingeniero
quote:The foreign meddling isn't at the literal ballot box.
foreign interests that are interfering in our election processes
Posted on 2/26/26 at 2:28 pm to Big Scrub TX
It is with unfettered mail in ballots.
Posted on 2/26/26 at 2:30 pm to Ingeniero
243. This would be 244, assuming another half dozen or so don't make it through before it. 243 in just over a year.
Combine that with the first term and we sit at 463.
Combine that with the first term and we sit at 463.
Posted on 2/26/26 at 2:31 pm to KiwiHead
quote:
You don't like the reach of the federal government ........except when the "right guy "is running the show.
Actually I said I'm not comfortable with a president having unilateral power over elections.
Did you skip that part?
Posted on 2/26/26 at 2:32 pm to BOHICAMAN
quote:
Could be 4D chess. 100% this would be struck down by the courts in about 5 seconds preventing any future frickery like what we saw during Covid.
I hope that's what it is. Pass the SAVE act, have voter ID, and then have it so a president can't just suspend the ID requirement by an EO.
Because any other reason to have this EO is a complete waste of time and gives ammo to the dems.
Posted on 2/26/26 at 2:35 pm to BOHICAMAN
quote:
Could be 4D chess. 100% this would be struck down by the courts in about 5 seconds preventing any future frickery like what we saw during Covid.
This is my thought process as well. Could be looking ahead knowing the foregone conclusion, but establishing legal precedent with the Highest Court.
If that's not the move, then this is just retarded.
Posted on 2/26/26 at 2:35 pm to Ingeniero
Trump is scared shitless of the upcoming elections.
Posted on 2/26/26 at 2:37 pm to Fun Bunch
double post....
This post was edited on 2/26/26 at 2:39 pm
Posted on 2/26/26 at 2:38 pm to GRTiger
And Chinese components in electronic voting systems...systems with proprietary software.
Why would we want private companies with proprietary software and questionable ownership counting our votes?
Why would we want private companies with proprietary software and questionable ownership counting our votes?
Posted on 2/26/26 at 2:39 pm to Fun Bunch
quote:
Would you want President Gavin Newsom to have control over elections?
They already do in the states and they cheated right? Leftist governors pushed fraud into the 2020 election in their states. State's changed their election laws without those laws being passed by state congresses.
They did whatever they wanted to.
This post was edited on 2/26/26 at 2:40 pm
Posted on 2/26/26 at 2:39 pm to TigerAxeOK
quote:
This is my thought process as well. Could be looking ahead knowing the foregone conclusion, but establishing legal precedent with the Highest Court. If that's not the move, then this is just retarded.
Agreed. It may be just wishful thinking on my part. Even if that’s not the goal it will be the end state regardless.
Posted on 2/26/26 at 2:42 pm to SallysHuman
He really does not. Regulating elections is expressly the province of the legislative branch as spelled out in Article 1 of the Constitution.
Posted on 2/26/26 at 2:45 pm to KiwiHead
quote:
Regulating elections is expressly the province of the legislative branch as spelled out in Article 1 of the Constitution.
Gee... like the first part of my post where I said
quote:
I wish Congress would do this.
What is your beef with anything I said? I wish Congress would take it on AND I'm not comfortable with a president having such powers.
Posted on 2/26/26 at 2:46 pm to Ingeniero
Chalking this up to being BS (hopefully), but I bet the melt on Reddit right now is next level. This is the best fear porn they could ever imagine.
Posted on 2/26/26 at 2:46 pm to Ingeniero
This is a clickbait headline totally lacking in context.
Posted on 2/26/26 at 2:50 pm to SallysHuman
It’s the WaPost and based on leaks from groups outside the White House. People should probably wait for an actual Executive Order before melting down, but they won’t.
Posted on 2/26/26 at 2:55 pm to GRTiger
quote:
I fricking hate this. Why don't we pass the SAVE act and protect our elections the right way?
Because the president and conservatives in congress are incapable of governing the correct way
Posted on 2/26/26 at 2:58 pm to gumpinmizzou
Which way to govern would get the act passed?
Posted on 2/26/26 at 3:01 pm to Riverside
quote:
It’s the WaPost and based on leaks from groups outside the White House. People should probably wait for an actual Executive Order before melting down, but they won’t.
It was the Trump admin that originally floated this possibility. This isn't the first mention of an EO with this purpose.
Page 2 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News