- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 4/20/25 at 2:12 pm to AGGIES
quote:
Specifically respect for and the Integrity of the Supreme Court.
bullshite. Leftists respect nothing unless it suits their purpose.
Posted on 4/20/25 at 2:23 pm to RohanGonzales
quote:
bullshite. Leftists respect nothing unless it suits their purpose.
Yep.
Those communist never demanded process when Biden was letting millions of illegals in.
They only care about "process" when it goes in their direction.
Posted on 4/20/25 at 2:30 pm to Willie Stroker
You can find a transcript of the first hearing in JGG v Trump - the first case filed challenging the AEA.
LINK
The government repeatedly states habeas is the appropriate judicial review under the AEA.
You can also see it in the filings made by the givernment in the case.
LINK
The government repeatedly states habeas is the appropriate judicial review under the AEA.
You can also see it in the filings made by the givernment in the case.
Posted on 4/20/25 at 2:30 pm to AGGIES
quote:
The test is to prove whether the American people, or Congress, will care enough if the Executive branch Signals that they will not even attempt to abide by the Supreme Court.
This is speculation on your part.
I speculate that if he did bring him back that you and others would claim Trump got an obvious quid pro quo and another Col. Vindman would appear.
This post was edited on 4/20/25 at 2:31 pm
Posted on 4/20/25 at 2:34 pm to JimEverett
quote:
The government repeatedly states habeas is the appropriate judicial review under the AEA.
But you cannot certify a class action under well settled habeas law which is what the ACLU is attempting. Habeas petitions are necessarily individualized filings. The putative class the ACLU is filing on behalf of is absurd.
Posted on 4/20/25 at 2:36 pm to boosiebadazz
I see. Now we are going to get into another brain dead back and forth about who gets to decide whats extraordinary
This post was edited on 4/20/25 at 2:38 pm
Posted on 4/20/25 at 2:57 pm to Vacherie Saint
quote:
Now we are going to get into another brain dead back and forth about who gets to decide whats extraordinary
Two can play at the extraordinary game.
Seems like Rubio decided it would be extraordinary for the State Department to full court press for his return.
Posted on 4/20/25 at 3:37 pm to Riverside
I agree. Was just making clear that the Trump Administration has taken the position from the start that habeas is appropriate under the AEA. One of the talking points the media feeds ignorant people is that the government is against due process.
Posted on 4/20/25 at 3:59 pm to TrueTiger
Yep. A plane is fueled up and ready if Bukele decides to release him from El Salvador.
So how is the facilitation standard not met? I guess Boosie wants to be able to define that too.
So how is the facilitation standard not met? I guess Boosie wants to be able to define that too.
Posted on 4/20/25 at 8:44 pm to BCreed1
Seriously two of the worst justices in history. An Uncle Tom wanna be and an total pos
Popular
Back to top


0








