
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
USPS will be FORCED to mail ballots to illegals and non-citizens.
Posted on 9/14/26 at 7:12 pm
Posted on 9/14/26 at 7:12 pm
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.quote:
Alito and Thomas dissented on the ruling.
Posted on 9/14/26 at 7:30 pm to Ailsa
Announce you will only handle military and overseas ballots.
Problem solved.
Problem solved.
Posted on 9/14/26 at 7:36 pm to Ailsa
Trump administration lawyers had urged the justices to step in and clear the way for its plan to use the Postal Service to screen ballot envelopes after they are submitted by state elections officials. The new rules would require states to submit lists of voters approved to receive mail ballots. The Postal Service would then deliver mail ballots only to the voters on the lists.
The plan would also require states to use an envelope approved by the Postal Service, including a unique bar code for each voter. Some states have argued that redesigning ballots so close to the election would be challenging or perhaps impossible, causing delays.
The Trump administration described the changes in court filings as “only modest envelope-design and addressee-information requirements” that fell within the Postal Service’s mandate under federal law.
Per the NYT
The plan would also require states to use an envelope approved by the Postal Service, including a unique bar code for each voter. Some states have argued that redesigning ballots so close to the election would be challenging or perhaps impossible, causing delays.
The Trump administration described the changes in court filings as “only modest envelope-design and addressee-information requirements” that fell within the Postal Service’s mandate under federal law.
Per the NYT
Posted on 9/14/26 at 7:38 pm to 4cubbies
quote:
The Supreme Court on Monday blocked a Trump administration plan to dramatically change how Americans vote by mail in the lead-up to the midterm elections, a major loss for President Trump, who has long claimed without evidence that fraud is rampant in mail voting.
The ruling was a resounding win for Democratic-led states and voting rights groups, which had argued that the plan was unconstitutional and an existential threat to the democratic process.
The Trump administration’s efforts, they had said, would introduce chaos and confusion as early voting gears up in many states.
Still, the weekslong legal tussle over the issue may have sown its own kind of confusion, a victory of sorts for Mr. Trump as he seeks to cast doubt on the integrity of the vote in an election his party might lose.
In a one-paragraph explanation, the court’s majority wrote that the government was “unlikely to succeed on the merits” at the conclusion of additional litigation on the issue.
The majority’s order was unsigned, which is typical in emergency rulings. It gave no vote count.
Justice Brett M. Kavanaugh, one of the court’s conservatives, wrote a one-paragraph concurrence. Writing for himself alone, he said that there was “at least a fair prospect” that new mail ballot rules issued by the Postal Service fell within its purview under federal statutes, but that allowing those changes so close to the midterms “would be arbitrary and capricious” because state and local elections officials would not have “sufficient time to reasonably implement” the changes.
In an eight-page dissent, Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr., joined by Justice Clarence Thomas, wrote that he would have allowed the Trump administration plan to go into effect for the midterms. Justice Alito called the legal challenge a “Hail Mary” pass that was unlikely to succeed and that he believed the administration would ultimately win the case because the Postal Service has “broad authority to regulate the mail.”
LINK
Posted on 9/14/26 at 7:39 pm to Ailsa
Celina Stewart of the ‘League of Women Voters’, who should be more concerned with battling diabetes, was celebrating the decision:

quote:
Celina Stewart, CEO of the League of Women Voters, one of the plaintiffs in the case, said in a statement, “Today, the Supreme Court refused to allow the federal government to throw our elections into chaos just weeks before Election Day.”
“The Postal Service exists to deliver Americans’ mail — not to rewrite election rules, demand voters’ personal information, or decide which ballots make it through the system,” Stewart said. “This was an extraordinary attempt to interfere with voting in all 50 states, and voters should never have been put in this position. Voters should never be caught in the middle of a political power warfare.”

Posted on 9/14/26 at 7:49 pm to weagle1999
This seems like it would create a lot of waste. Would Trump’s rules force a ballot to be mailed to every eligible voter in a uniquely barcoded envelope?
Posted on 9/14/26 at 7:49 pm to Ailsa
quote:How the hell can USPS determine a person's citizenship? I've only talked to my mail man a couple of times. He's got no clue who I am.
USPS will be FORCED to mail ballots to illegals and non-citizens.
Posted on 9/14/26 at 7:51 pm to Taxing Authority
This is what small government looks like.
Posted on 9/14/26 at 7:57 pm to Ailsa
They want Trump gone and all the apple carts he flipped over outright with bad apples with globalization.
President AOC will do for them as Tucker moves to Qatar.
President AOC will do for them as Tucker moves to Qatar.
Posted on 9/14/26 at 8:01 pm to Taxing Authority
It looks like individual states would still decide who gets ballots so this would just force states to buy special TRUMP envelopes.
Posted on 9/14/26 at 8:14 pm to 4cubbies
quote:
This is what small government looks like.
It's always funs when people who obviously don't want small government, such as yourself, pretend they support things that advance small government.
Posted on 9/14/26 at 8:18 pm to imjustafatkid
Which of my positions is pro-big government?
Posted on 9/14/26 at 8:21 pm to 4cubbies
quote:
Which of my positions is pro-big government?
All of them.
Posted on 9/14/26 at 8:21 pm to 4cubbies
Big win for you cheaters and low lifes
Posted on 9/14/26 at 8:22 pm to 4cubbies
You love the welfare state. Not exactly small government
This post was edited on 9/14/26 at 8:23 pm
Posted on 9/14/26 at 8:25 pm to 4cubbies
quote:
Justice Alito called the legal challenge a “Hail Mary” pass that was unlikely to succeed and that he believed the administration would ultimately win the case because the Postal Service has “broad authority to regulate the mail.”
He's right you know.
Posted on 9/14/26 at 9:31 pm to 4cubbies
quote:
This is what small government looks like.
Posted on 9/15/26 at 12:20 am to Ailsa
Good.! Trump’s attempt to rig the mid - terms has been averted. What’s next? Promise of bribes for votes. Oh wait…

Popular
Back to top


18














