- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: U.S. in 'sex recession,' with young adults most affected, data shows
Posted on 9/1/25 at 11:29 am to FooManChoo
Posted on 9/1/25 at 11:29 am to FooManChoo
Covid vax
Posted on 9/1/25 at 11:34 am to deltaland
quote:
This. I think regular porn showing regular sex wouldn’t be too bad but the hardcore stuff should be banned.
agree
Not to go too deep with this, but I weakened myself badly by watching porn and participating in some parties of the adult variety. It ruined my ability to enjoy sex in a normal monogamous way for a long time.
Posted on 9/1/25 at 11:41 am to Ghost of Ed
quote:
Don't even think about asking a coworker out or end up in HR for harassment.
My grandparents met at work. But if I were single, I would Never approach a gal at work now. Hell, I used to give compliments about hair and dress. I don’t even do that anymore. Work is just too much of a minefield for such things now. Its a new world.
Posted on 9/1/25 at 11:55 am to stout
Mouse Utopia is in full effect.
Posted on 9/1/25 at 12:00 pm to stout
I mean have you seen how fat our women are now?
Posted on 9/1/25 at 12:58 pm to stout
These surveys are such BS. I’ve never been contacted to take one. I’ve never heard of anyone I know that’s taken one. Nor of anyone they know.
This BS is fabricated.
This BS is fabricated.
This post was edited on 9/1/25 at 12:58 pm
Posted on 9/1/25 at 12:59 pm to SaintsTiger
quote:
These surveys are such BS. I’ve never been contacted to take one. I’ve never heard of anyone I know that’s taken one. Nor of anyone they know.
This is also how I know the lottery is fake.
Posted on 9/1/25 at 1:06 pm to stout
Fluoride in the water reduces testosterone on purpose.
Well at age 50, I bring those numbers way up. I’ve been on the daily, when on period days. Younger Latina with the stamina I had in high school. It’s healthy to get the semen always refreshing a new batch.
Well at age 50, I bring those numbers way up. I’ve been on the daily, when on period days. Younger Latina with the stamina I had in high school. It’s healthy to get the semen always refreshing a new batch.
Posted on 9/1/25 at 1:09 pm to FooManChoo
quote:
Lack of fornication is a good thing.
I would love to see more people get married, though.
Yes to both, but the trouble is, those statistics probably don't apply to the low educated and/or welfare queens, the ones we really want those figures to address!
Posted on 9/1/25 at 1:21 pm to SaintsTiger
quote:
These surveys are such BS. I’ve never been contacted to take one. I’ve never heard of anyone I know that’s taken one. Nor of anyone they know.
“I just don't see how Nixon won. Nobody I know voted for him”
Posted on 9/1/25 at 1:32 pm to FooManChoo
quote:
Lack of fornication is a good thing.
I bet history will prove this is very much not a good thing
Posted on 9/1/25 at 1:36 pm to FooManChoo
quote:
Lack of fornication is a good thing.
Speak for yourself, soy-boy.
Posted on 9/1/25 at 1:37 pm to stout
The average woman wants absolutely nothing to do with the average man. If you are a top 10% man, you are getting 90% of the women. Women would rather share a high value man than date an average male exclusively. Thrown in that a high percentage of women have completely lost their minds going full on leftist & woke. The I-phone & dating apps have caused your average man to be completely ignored. If you are under 6 foot & make anything less than 6 figures you are almost completely out of the dating pool as a male.
Posted on 9/1/25 at 1:38 pm to DesScorp
Looking under the hood, the only asked 2,000 people questions. I don’t care what any bureaucrat or academic says, it’s not statistically significant. Moreover, in this day and age of modern techthere are easy ways to reach very large samples and collect large data sets. This is an example of government funds being wasted.
survey Source FAQ
Also, for the Nixon election they had actual physical ballots proving people voted for him. Do better next time you post.
quote:
From 1972 until 1993, the GSS was administered almost annually. The target sample size for th?e annual surveys was 1500; actual sample sizes ranged between 1372 (1990) and 1613 (1972). Additionally, there were oversamples of black respondents in 1982 (oversample of 354) and 1987 (oversample of 353). There were no GSSs in 1979, 1981, or 1992.
Since 1994 the GSS has been administered to two samples in even-numbered years, each with a target sample size of 1500, rather than to a single 1500-person sample each year. Total sample sizes for these biennial GSSs ranged between 2765 (2002) and 2992 (1994). In 2006, a third sample was added and the sample size was 4510. There have been no oversamples during this period.
The GSS augemnted its replicating cross-sectional design with a design that uses rotating panels starting in 2006, 2008, and 2010. Under the new three-wave, rotating panel design in each round of the GSS, a new panel is started, the first reinterview from the previous GSS is conducted, and the second and final reinterview from the GSS panel started four years ago is conducted. In 2008 there were two components: a new 2008 cross-section with 2,023 cases and the first re-interviews (panel) with 1,536 respondents from the 2006 GSS. The 2,023 cases in the cross-section have been previously released as a part of the 1972-2008 cumulative data. This new release includes those 1,536 re-interviewed panel cases along with the 2,023 cases. In 2010 the rolling panel design was fully implemented for the first time. The rotating panel design was discontinued after 2014.
For more information on the GSS sampling design, and completion/response rates, see Appendix A: Sampling Design & Weighting.
survey Source FAQ
Also, for the Nixon election they had actual physical ballots proving people voted for him. Do better next time you post.
Posted on 9/1/25 at 1:41 pm to deltaland
quote:
I think regular porn showing regular sex wouldn’t be too bad
What are you deeming regular porn and regular sex?
Posted on 9/1/25 at 1:43 pm to stout
1. Complain about lack of morals
2. Complain about a lack of casual sex
You can’t win
2. Complain about a lack of casual sex
You can’t win
Posted on 9/1/25 at 1:45 pm to stout
quote:
Powerman probably
Rent free lol
Posted on 9/1/25 at 1:50 pm to dallastiger55
quote:
Also, big Pharma and doctors putting every middle-aged person on an antidepressant,
According to the psychiatrist that Tucker just interviewed this week, 70% of patients who are put on an SSRI will have some type of sexual dysfunction. 70%. He then explained how this can lead to questioning one’s sexuality…. Patient USED to like seeing naked chics and having sex with his girlfriend and now he couldn’t care any less then leading to well, maybe he thinks he must be gay?? Or should identify as a woman? Psych med prescriptions are way up and they can be so harmful physically and mentally.
Posted on 9/1/25 at 1:50 pm to geauxtigers87
quote:
modern dating/marriage. women are unrealistic and dudes are saying frick it (no pun intended)
Women would settle if HR departments were dissolved and men had all the good jobs again.
Posted on 9/1/25 at 1:52 pm to Hetfield
quote:
The average woman wants absolutely nothing to do with the average man. If you are a top 10% man, you are getting 90% of the women. Women would rather share a high value man than date an average male exclusively.
Its this corporatized view of dating that causes people to give up on it. I think besides porn, dating apps have become a negative to most young men.
Popular
Back to top


0






