Started By
Message

re: Update on Olympic boxer - definitely not a "biological woman"

Posted on 8/5/24 at 11:51 am to
Posted by Ebridg3
Baton Rouge, La
Member since Sep 2016
2996 posts
Posted on 8/5/24 at 11:51 am to
quote:

The IOC does not check for chromosomes for some odd reason.


From what I gather from the article I linked. This is an issue of trans rights for the IOC. Apparently they got into it with the IBA and others over the opening ceremony as well. So, they had all the information they needed and allowed this to happen. This is probably why their response was so carefully crafted and the first line from their response had to do with "womens rights and non descrimination."

I just don't appreciate the incorporation of logical fallacies like associated the IBA with Russian corruption, etc etc... like that had anything to do with this.

quote:

So even though this woman was born with female genitalia, they are biologically a male? Does that mean a woman born with male genitalia is biologically a woman if she has slightly higher estrogen levels? lmao you idiots literally cannot put together a single logical argument.


This post was edited on 8/5/24 at 11:54 am
Posted by BugAC
St. George
Member since Oct 2007
57051 posts
Posted on 8/5/24 at 11:55 am to
quote:

why normal Americans think maga people are weird


Trannies are not normal. Pedophilia is not normal.

There is nothing normal about you, and trying to redefine the word to fit your depravity is not working. Even gays don't like the trannies.
Posted by prplngldtigr
just up da bayou from down
Member since Dec 2004
7889 posts
Posted on 8/5/24 at 11:57 am to
You seem to be weirdly obsessed with the genitalia.

I see hormonal/biologic based comments in this thread, but you can’t help yourself and come back to the genitalia over and over.

Maybe sit the rest of this out, perv.

Posted by tketaco
Sunnyside, Houston
Member since Jan 2010
21528 posts
Posted on 8/5/24 at 11:58 am to
quote:

FYI, your unhinged obsession with this woman's genitalia is just another prime example of why normal Americans think maga people are weird


I think the lot of you being quiet about Biden showering with his 13 year old daughter is weird. Care to comment since it's been proven true? Or will you conveniently dodge this as well?
This post was edited on 8/5/24 at 12:01 pm
Posted by The Maj
Member since Sep 2016
30547 posts
Posted on 8/5/24 at 11:59 am to
quote:

woman was born with female genitalia


XY chromosomes still tell the tale in the end... I am sorry you failed basic biology and stuff...
Posted by rnojoman
Harlan
Member since Nov 2023
139 posts
Posted on 8/5/24 at 12:00 pm to
quote:

Trannies are not normal. Pedophilia is not normal.


If you actually cared about pedophiles, maybe you wouldn't be supporting the guy who's all over the epstein files and flight logs? the fat, broke, loser who is also a convicted sex offender?
Posted by RockyMtnTigerWDE
War Damn Eagle Dad!
Member since Oct 2010
108329 posts
Posted on 8/5/24 at 12:00 pm to
They really pushed that the one was absolutely female.
Posted by BugAC
St. George
Member since Oct 2007
57051 posts
Posted on 8/5/24 at 12:02 pm to
quote:

maybe you wouldn't be supporting the guy who's all over the epstein files and flight logs?


Hate to break it to you, but i do not support Bill Clinton.

quote:

the fat, broke, loser who is also a convicted sex offender?


Hunter Biden? I don't think he's fat, but a diet of meth tends to burn the calories.

Tell me, how hard did you push for kids to be able to attend drag shows?

Please, lets keep up the comparison of who is "weird".

Hint: You will lose this game.
This post was edited on 8/5/24 at 12:03 pm
Posted by jimmy the leg
Member since Aug 2007
42486 posts
Posted on 8/5/24 at 12:04 pm to
quote:

The interesting part is that if they truly were born with female genitalia and still have female genitalia but blood markers and other biological characteristics more associated with males, we’re in a much more difficult place in trying to police this stuff.


Not really.

XY = male.

End of discussion.

Is it fair, probably not.

But neither is the current situation.
Posted by stout
Porte du Lafitte
Member since Sep 2006
179818 posts
Posted on 8/5/24 at 12:06 pm to
quote:

Last time I saw this many people knighting so hard for a dude that likes to beat on women, I was passing through the hood during the OJ trial.


Did you forget how the defended woman beater George Floyd?
Posted by SUB
Silver Tier TD Premium
Member since Jan 2009
24841 posts
Posted on 8/5/24 at 12:09 pm to
quote:

So even though this woman was born with female genitalia


How do we know this is true?
Posted by rnojoman
Harlan
Member since Nov 2023
139 posts
Posted on 8/5/24 at 12:18 pm to
Lmao 2 pages of maga scientists debating testosterone levels and XY chromosones. this is why you lost, bigly, in 2020, and why you pathetic weirdos will lose again in November.
Posted by bbvdd
Memphis, TN
Member since Jun 2009
28209 posts
Posted on 8/5/24 at 12:23 pm to
quote:

Says the weirdo looking into the testosterone levels of a female boxer from Algeria


Guessing you don't know how chromosomes work
Posted by RAB
Member since Aug 2019
1629 posts
Posted on 8/5/24 at 12:28 pm to
quote:

Umar Kremlev, President of the IBA


The media is also telling us that this guy is a stooge for Vladimir Putin. Another Russia hoax!
Posted by tketaco
Sunnyside, Houston
Member since Jan 2010
21528 posts
Posted on 8/5/24 at 12:33 pm to
quote:

Lmao 2 pages of maga scientists debating testosterone levels and XY chromosones. this is why you lost, bigly, in 2020, and why you pathetic weirdos will lose again in November.


Still quiet.
Posted by WaltWhite504
Member since Sep 2021
2108 posts
Posted on 8/5/24 at 1:03 pm to
Your source for the article has a podcast and website but only 276 followers?

quote:

He could not give details of the blood test results but people could ‘read between the lines.’


What funny about MAGA is that you can pile all the factual evidence you want on the table about Trump and they are quick to say 'its not enough' or 'past statute of limitations' or 'they didn't have the right to search that closet'

But on issues like this "read between the lines" = DEFINATE


Posted by jizzle6609
Houston
Member since Jul 2009
17886 posts
Posted on 8/5/24 at 1:05 pm to
The gay-straight relationship has gotten stronger.
Posted by Smeg
Member since Aug 2018
14564 posts
Posted on 8/5/24 at 1:08 pm to

Democrats think that is what a woman looks like.
Posted by skeeter531
Member since Jun 2014
2487 posts
Posted on 8/5/24 at 1:43 pm to
If there are XY chromosomes but the infant doesn't have typically male genitalia, it is because at one point in the development when the specific gene activates the development of the male genitalia, something went wrong and it didn't develop properly...but they are then still males who just aren't fully typical, but due to their genital appearance, they are 'assigned' as female at birth. It all should boil down to xx and xy.
There has to be objective criteria for the safety and fairness of the actual female athletes.
Posted by The Maj
Member since Sep 2016
30547 posts
Posted on 8/5/24 at 1:46 pm to
quote:

There has to be objective criteria for the safety and fairness of the actual female athletes.


Naw man, science is hard and stuff... We need to go on the feels, no matter how absurd it may appear...
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram