- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Ulysses S Grant is the Undisputed GOAT US General
Posted on 5/19/21 at 2:06 pm to Burt Reynolds
Posted on 5/19/21 at 2:06 pm to Burt Reynolds
quote:
Ulysses S Grant is the Undisputed GOAT US General
I’d definitely say that this statement could be disputed.
Posted on 5/19/21 at 2:10 pm to vl100butch
Sherman did more for LSU than the confederate traitors ever did and a lot of people don’t appreciate that. We should be called the fighting shermans instead of the fighting tigers.
Posted on 5/19/21 at 2:20 pm to Burt Reynolds
quote:
Sherman did more for LSU than the confederate traitors ever did and a lot of people don’t appreciate that. We should be called the fighting shermans instead of the fighting tigers
There are a group of us on the lookout for a Sherman tank to bring to campus as the Sherman Memorial Tank as the woke leadership with their south will rise again allies will never allow the ROTC building to be named for Sherman...
Posted on 5/19/21 at 2:21 pm to Burt Reynolds
Lol. He had the easy gig. He didn’t have to make the big decisions years 1-3.
Posted on 5/19/21 at 2:33 pm to Burt Reynolds
quote:
revolutionized modern warfare with total warfare
They were doing this shite in ancient times
Posted on 5/19/21 at 2:36 pm to crazy4lsu
Don't forget his use of Naval on the MS River. He had gunboats and the confederacy really did not. It's his barrage from naval guns at Shiloh which stopped the Confederates cold.
He gets a bad rap because of Wilderness and Cold Harbor which were slaughters. But both sides suffered pretty high casualty rates at both. In the west he inflicted much more pain than he suffered.
He gets a bad rap because of Wilderness and Cold Harbor which were slaughters. But both sides suffered pretty high casualty rates at both. In the west he inflicted much more pain than he suffered.
Posted on 5/19/21 at 2:46 pm to KiwiHead
quote:
Don't forget his use of Naval on the MS River. He had gunboats and the confederacy really did not. It's his barrage from naval guns at Shiloh which stopped the Confederates cold.
He also performed several clever maneuvers to even get into place to lay siege upon Vicksburg. It was very underrated work in terms of the popular imagination, as the difficulty of laying siege to the area is hard to convey.
quote:
He gets a bad rap because of Wilderness and Cold Harbor which were slaughters. But both sides suffered pretty high casualty rates at both. In the west he inflicted much more pain than he suffered.
The casualty rate for Wilderness was around 17%, which was among his highest of the war, but he also inflicted an 18% casualty rate on Lee. He had around a 11% casualty rate at Cold Harbor, but he also regretted the final assault which was of little gain.
This post was edited on 5/19/21 at 2:48 pm
Posted on 5/19/21 at 2:56 pm to aggressor
quote:
When you have a massive numbers advantage with unlimited supplies and DGAF about casualties you tend to win. I suppose you think Sark is the greatest Offensive Coordinator in history.
Oh, and Grant isn't even a shadow of the brilliance of George Washington who beat the most powerful military in world history at the time at the height of its power.
There was some Divine intervention that allowed the US to defeat England. A lot of very unlikely events occurred during the Revolutionary War that lead to the defeat of the Brits.
Posted on 5/19/21 at 3:01 pm to Burt Reynolds
quote:No.
Grant revolutionized modern warfare with total warfare, naval collaboration, modern siege and entrenchments. He was an early practitioner of amphibious warfare and promoted extensive collaboration with Farragut/Porter in the navy while in the West. Grant had a plan to put out the Confederacy, a strategic one, the only Union general up to that point to apply pressure to the Confederacy in the East and make that theater collapse. His victories at Fort Henry and Fort Donelson set the stage for the new age of amphibious warfare. His coordination with Admiral Foote’s naval flotilla led to the surrender of Fort Henry before Grant could even attack and later Fort Donelson through continuous bombardment into submission. He was the most stoic of all US generals, there is a story about Grant posing for a picture in Mathew Brady’s studio. An assistant accidently broke a skylight above his head and glass came raining down in shards that could have killed him. Grant supposedly looked up at the window and then back to the camera. That was it. It didn’t even jar him. Later in the war, there was a massive explosion on a steamship docked nearby caused by a group of confederate terrorists. Everyone hit the deck but Grant. He ran towards it..
Grant was tenacious, aggressive, and unrelenting. Once he set his sights on a target, Grant relentlessly pursued his objectives to the very end, often much further than his opponents were willing (or able) to go. But, contrary to what many neo-Confederates would say, I would argue that Grant was not a butcher, or one dimensional. Rather, Grant was dedicated, and would not turn back as did McClellan, Hooker, and Burnside. Further, Grant's battles like Shiloh, Vicksburg, and Chattanooga prove that he was able to use maneuver to destroy his enemies. In Vicksburg he was pitted not only against the confederate army but also General McClernand who was also vying for a promotion. Grant landed his troops on the other side of the Mississippi with no supply line and no communications back to Halleck. The only wagons he brought with him were heavily loaded with munitions. Everything else was found by foraging and living off the land. When Grant landed his troops, he was quickly opposed by the armies of Pemberton and Johnston (Pemberton manned the garrison, while Johnston fought a dynamic defense). Johnstons forces began engaging Grant almost immediately. The Confederates sought a repeat of the 1862 campaign, where Grants rear areas were ravaged and he was forced to retreat. But Grant had cut his supply line to the Mississippi river, and so there was nothing to be ravaged that wasnt protected by a large army. Johnston lost a tremendous amount of time and energy by trying to cut Grants line of communication, and all the while Grant pushed forward towards Jackson, MS, defeating Confederate details as he went. The Confederates were pushed into Jackson and Johnston's army was smashed. Grant then turned on Pemberton, who had based himself out of Vicksburg and had harassed Grants flank the whole time. Grant hemmed Pemberton into the city, and laid a classic siege envelopment of the town which led it to fall on July 4 1863. Not only did Grant win a major series of battles and destroy two Confederate armies, but the capture of Vicksburg was a major strategic victory for the Federals. It closed all trans-Mississippi trade for the Confederacy, and freed up Union troops to push even deeper into the South. And it was done thanks to US Grant, who won a truly Napoleonic victory. In Chattanooga he was faced similar or worse odds than Rosecranz at Chickamauga. With union forces trapped/starved in Chattanooga surrounded by Braxton Bragg, he hurriedly assembled an assault force with Sherman, Thomas and Hooker working together. His concerted attack up the middle with Thomas to take Missionary Ridge and utterly shatter Bragg’s line was kind of similar to Pickett’s charge except actually well-calculated and successful.
For my money, Vicksburg is undeniable proof that Grant was a master of maneuver warfare, better than the level of Lee. But then there is the whole sticky business of the Overland Campaign, and the massive casualties sustained. But I would argue that the Overland Campaign was a whole different beast, a new and shockingly modern system of warfare which would be more comfortable in 1914, than in 1864. In this new system, both sides will suffer (and the Union will suffer more, it cannot be denied), but I will suggest that it was necessary, it was the best approach to the situation, it conceals an artful campaign of maneuver, and it has inspired American Military thinkers ever since. “Grant the butcher” actually lost less men than Lee, the real butcher. Throughout the Civil War Grant's armies incurred approximately 154,000 casualties, while having inflicted 191,000 casualties on his opposing Confederate armies. Compare that to Lee who had 209K casualties. After the retreat from Gettysburg, the Confederate army occupied positions on the south side of the Rappahannock River, while the Union camped on the North side with Meade unwilling to cross and attack the army of the Potomac head on. After several sideshows in the west , US Grant became only the 3rd general in US history to be given the rank of US army Lieutenant general (the other two being George Washington and Winnfield Scott). Now given overall command of Union forces. He took over the Army of the Potomac, and only May 4, 1864 he began crossing the Rappahannock and Rapidan River. Lee had set up his base of operations on the other side of the Wilderness, a dense area of forest on the south side of the Rappahannock River. When Lee learned of Grant's movements, he immediately ordered an attack into the Wilderness. After several days of confused fighting, Lee was in definite possession of all the major avenues out of the Wilderness towards headed directly towards Richmond. Most Union Generals, once in this position, quickly abandoned the campaign and returned North in defeat (and it should be remembered that the Battle of Chancellorsville was fought on exactly the same ground). But Grant, while defeated tactically, did not accept the traditional strategic implications of that defeat. Where almost every other general would have called himself checked, Grant simply tried a new strategy. Instead of fighting on Lee's terms, Grant would simply continue applying pressure on Lee's exposed flanks. As such, Grant did something that no other Union general had ever done. He turned Lee's flank.
Throughout his tenure in the civil war he arguably went undefeated aside from Cold Harbor. Grant was the only general during the civil war who received the surrender of three Confederate armies. Grant and Sherman were one of the greatest one-two punches in the history of warfare and could have certainly defeated or at the least held their own with any other army in the world at that time. There is no other US general that can really match US Grant’s resume. He is truly the GOAT.
Posted on 5/19/21 at 3:05 pm to ronricks
quote:
You'd have to be absolutely incompetent to lose in a scenario like that
That was kind of the case for the US Generals that proceeded Grant.
Talk about a who's who of idiots.
Posted on 5/19/21 at 3:17 pm to RD Dawg
quote:
quote:
You'd have to be absolutely incompetent to lose in a scenario like that
That was kind of the case for the US Generals that proceeded Grant.
Talk about a who's who of idiots.
The US Military in 1860 was overwhelmingly Southern in its Officer Corps. The North had to go through quite a few Generals before they could find anyone somewhat competent. It's also not a coincidence that as the war went on and the North's advantage in supplies and troop numbers became overwhelming suddenly their Generals looked a lot smarter.
The key to victory for the South was always to get the North to decide it wasn't worth it and let them go. They were never going to be able to defeat the North completely. They lost that chance after Manassas when they didn't continue down and capture DC and then sue for terms. After that they were in a war of attrition they could not win.
Posted on 5/19/21 at 3:24 pm to Burt Reynolds
The sad thing to me is the fact that the soldiers of both armies had more respect for their adversaries than all of you self proclaimed experts. The war was a national calamity fought by mostly honorable men who served for many different reasons. The current practice of demonizing mortal men of their time by today's standards is foolish. The fact that no Confederate soldier was prosecuted for treason speaks more of the character of those men than you idiots of today.
Posted on 5/19/21 at 3:28 pm to Burt Reynolds
Is this a Political Talk issue?
This belongs on the OT along with the other threads exactly like this one that pops up every two weeks - same thread - every two weeks.

This belongs on the OT along with the other threads exactly like this one that pops up every two weeks - same thread - every two weeks.
Posted on 5/19/21 at 3:32 pm to Burt Reynolds
US Grant was always full of "courage".
Posted on 5/19/21 at 3:53 pm to Burt Reynolds
He is truly the GOAT.
Not hardly.
Not hardly.
Posted on 5/19/21 at 3:56 pm to aggressor
quote:
The key to victory for the South was always to get the North to decide it wasn't worth it and let them go.
Arguably, they didn't fight that sort of war at all. Grant, all throughout the war, usually set the terms of the engagement, while the South didn't have a cogent strategy in terms of how they would get the Union to capitulate.
Posted on 5/19/21 at 3:57 pm to Zahrim
Did not read, but hey, enjoy a downvote anyways.
Posted on 5/19/21 at 4:39 pm to Burt Reynolds
TF? You just get out of 10th grade US history and pick up a soy latte?
And your best ever general required superior numbers every battle and would have lost Shiloh with it if not for a delay caused by rain.
Sorry it’s George S. Patron. And it’s not close. His use of tanks and armor is still considered revolutionary today.
And your best ever general required superior numbers every battle and would have lost Shiloh with it if not for a delay caused by rain.
Sorry it’s George S. Patron. And it’s not close. His use of tanks and armor is still considered revolutionary today.
Posted on 5/19/21 at 4:41 pm to Bass Tiger
The 13 colonies had a lot of help from other European nations but many British citizens were not in favor of the war. It also didn't help that the British government was spent and broke from the French and Indian war.
Posted on 5/19/21 at 4:45 pm to CleverUserName
Patton wasn’t even MVP of the European theater. That title goes to Zhukov.
Popular
Back to top


0




