- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Tucker says Jan 6 committee wants to abolish Electoral College and change voting laws.
Posted on 6/6/22 at 9:47 pm to SammyTiger
Posted on 6/6/22 at 9:47 pm to SammyTiger
quote:Still under 50% and won the EC.
Got more votes in 92 and 96
Posted on 6/6/22 at 9:49 pm to Taxing Authority
And?
They said
Fewer votes than someone else running.
Not fewer than 50%
Bill Clinton never lost a popular vote.
They said
quote:
Trump to win the presidency despite getting fewer votes, so Republicans are all for it.
Fewer votes than someone else running.
Not fewer than 50%
Bill Clinton never lost a popular vote.
Posted on 6/6/22 at 9:53 pm to SammyTiger
quote:
Bill Clinton never lost a popular vote.
Posted on 6/6/22 at 10:18 pm to Froman
quote:If you want to live in a National system, perhaps.
The electoral college (is) archaic and unnecessary
I like our Federal system, and the EC is an integral component of that system.
Posted on 6/6/22 at 10:32 pm to Taxing Authority
Ok.
That’s happened 18 times.
Did anyone ever finish with more popular votes than him?
That’s happened 18 times.
Did anyone ever finish with more popular votes than him?
This post was edited on 6/6/22 at 10:35 pm
Posted on 6/6/22 at 10:38 pm to L1C4
quote:
abolish Electoral College and change voting laws.
that is the ultimate goal of the democrats. They want hunger games. They want to enslave middle / rural America.
Posted on 6/6/22 at 10:57 pm to Ponchy Tiger
The electoral college is like participation trophies counting for something.
Oh no one wants to live in your state?
Don’t be sad you can have 3x as many votes as you deserve.
Wouldn’t want you feeling less important that millions more people.
Oh no one wants to live in your state?
Don’t be sad you can have 3x as many votes as you deserve.
Wouldn’t want you feeling less important that millions more people.
This post was edited on 6/6/22 at 10:58 pm
Posted on 6/7/22 at 1:54 am to SammyTiger
quote:
Wouldn’t want you feeling less important that millions more people.
The irony is that it’s retards like you and liberal shitholes that benefit most from the electoral college. The last 18 months are proof of this.
This post was edited on 6/7/22 at 1:59 am
Posted on 6/7/22 at 2:00 am to SammyTiger
quote:honestly, would you be okay if states were allowed to dissolve and then you can do away with the EC?
The electoral college is like participation trophies counting for something.
Oh no one wants to live in your state?
Don’t be sad you can have 3x as many votes as you deserve.
Wouldn’t want you feeling less important that millions more people.
NO state joined the union to be a part of a nationalized democracy.
Posted on 6/7/22 at 2:56 am to SammyTiger
quote:
The electoral college is like participation trophies counting for something.
Oh no one wants to live in your state?
Don’t be sad you can have 3x as many votes as you deserve.
Wouldn’t want you feeling less important that millions more people.
It’s terrifying that people like you don’t even have a basic understanding of our election system yet wanna be the loudest voice in the room.
Thanks for getting us where we are today, a-hole.
Posted on 6/7/22 at 4:17 am to SammyTiger
quote:
The electoral college is like participation trophies counting for something.
Oh no one wants to live in your state?
Lol. What a dumb argument. All those ghetto and overpriced apartment dwellers in big cities too stupid to improve their lives by moving are not people to be impressed by.
quote:
Don’t be sad you can have 3x as many votes as you deserve.
Wouldn’t want you feeling less important that millions more people.
Having more idiots isn't a virtue and doesn't give you the right to dictate policy for people that share no common beliefs. Letting criminals run wild may work for shitholes like L.A. and Portland, but it doesn't work in small town America. There's a reason we are a collection of states. Obviously, the common sense required to understand how this country was founded in order to support the best government for each community is not something you possess.
Posted on 6/7/22 at 4:55 am to TenWheelsForJesus
If everything is supposed to be just thrown out the window and you don’t like the EC then you trust the states then correct?
How about since lines are already drawn for counties and parishes then just use them. In national elections it would be like 4000-500 in favor of republicans. Froman you ok with that?
Of course you aren’t cause you’re an idiot that doesn’t understand we are a representative republic not a fricking democracy.
How about since lines are already drawn for counties and parishes then just use them. In national elections it would be like 4000-500 in favor of republicans. Froman you ok with that?
Of course you aren’t cause you’re an idiot that doesn’t understand we are a representative republic not a fricking democracy.
Posted on 6/7/22 at 5:17 am to xiv
quote:
A fake news program for marks.
Nothing to see here is a new argument from the people that spent four years telling us they definitely want to abolish the electoral college and that rebutting their childish arguments is racist hate speech and anti-democratic.
Posted on 6/7/22 at 5:54 am to Froman
If anyone should be the poster child for abortion it is you. I hope you never procreate.
Posted on 6/7/22 at 6:15 am to Froman
quote:
In their time. The electoral college would have been removed a long time ago if we had any sense. It’s archaic and unnecessary, but it allows people like Trump to win the presidency despite getting fewer votes, so Republicans are all for it. There is not one good argument that it should remain.
its needed so we can keep the libtards and conservatards in check
Posted on 6/7/22 at 6:15 am to TomBuchanan
quote:
You can abolish the Electoral College, if states are allowed to form their own country because those states never would have entered into the union, if they knew NYC, Los Angeles, and Chicago would control all the decisions
You're wasting energy trying to explain what states actually are to people like Froman. They believe that the states were created by the federal government to be sub-units of federal power. They don't even have the slightest understanding of the word "state." To them it's just a synonym for "province." Because of this, they'll never be able to grasp the concept of a limited federal government.
Posted on 6/7/22 at 6:18 am to Shorty_price
quote:
I am impressed by how fricking stupid you are.
I, for one, am not. Depressed would be a better descriptor.
Posted on 6/7/22 at 6:19 am to squid_hunt
quote:It requires two thirds of both houses and 38 states to abolish the EC. There’s nothing to see here.
Nothing to see here is a new argument from the people that spent four years telling us they definitely want to abolish the electoral college
Fake news program for marks.
Posted on 6/7/22 at 7:38 am to L1C4
Did tucker actually explain how the Dems "think" they would accomplish this via dog and pony show? And especially in time for Novembers elections.
Posted on 6/7/22 at 8:32 am to Froman
quote:
In their time. The electoral college would have been removed a long time ago if we had any sense. It’s archaic and unnecessary, but it allows people like Trump to win the presidency despite getting fewer votes, so Republicans are all for it. There is not one good argument that it should remain.
The only reason Republicans get fewer votes is because Democrats spread illegal votes from illegal immigrants all over the country but more so in California. Are you really pretending to not know why they insist on keeping our borders unsecured? The EC is the only thing keeping that aspect of it honest.
Doesn't that get tiresome, having to pretend you don't know common sense things just to avoid having to admit how openly corrupt your party is?
The problem is you see everything for how you want it to benefit the Democrat party which is the opposite of what the founders were doing. They were coming up with a system that benefited the people, not a political party. But I am sure you know better than them.
Popular
Back to top



1






