- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 3/25/26 at 8:18 am to trinidadtiger
quote:
The good reason.......privacy issues
The privacy act of 1974 says that FedGov can share *any* information it has about you with other agencies, departments, etc., for "law enforcement purposes."
As some may be aware, Congress passes tens of thousands of pages of laws a year, and then you can tack on executive authority seceded by the legislature to executive agencies (EPA, etc.)
My CIPP/G was worthless as soon as I got the certification decades ago.
Posted on 3/25/26 at 8:37 am to novabill
quote:
What is the benefit of nabbing someone leaving on their own?
If they were flying back to Guatamala your comment would be acceptable, but they weren't.
Posted on 3/25/26 at 8:44 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
quote:
Ms. Lopez-Jimenez, 41, a native of Guatemala, and her daughter, Wendy Godinez-Lopez, were flagged by T.S.A. officials on Friday when they showed up on a passenger list for a Sunday flight from San Francisco to Miami.
You have to be a real dumbass illegal alien to think it’s ok to fly around the US. Unlike voting you have to have an ID to fly.
quote:
She had no criminal history, though she entered the country illegally.
Entering the country illegally is in fact a criminal history.
Posted on 3/25/26 at 8:57 am to novabill
quote:
What is the benefit of nabbing someone leaving on their own?
She wasn't leaving the US, but she is now.
Posted on 3/25/26 at 9:11 am to Adam Banks
quote:the bigger question for me is, how were she and her daughter (no age given) supporting themselves?
She had no criminal history, though she entered the country illegally.
if either of them were employed, did they have a valid SS#? were they filing state and Federal income taxes?
also, since both were required to show Real IDs at the airport, what documentation did they provide to the state (presumably California) to obtain them?
Posted on 3/25/26 at 9:48 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
We need to change the rules so I can upvote more than once! This is what I voted for.
Posted on 3/25/26 at 9:51 am to lake chuck fan
quote:
agree with the incarceration part, but Marxist Dem supporters will never view it this way
Ain't that some tough shite. They'll have time reflect in prison
Posted on 3/25/26 at 9:56 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
quote:
Democratic officials recoiled this week at the detention.
Posted on 3/25/26 at 10:00 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
It is low hanging fruit being taken care of.
If someone is a know illegal who has already been ordered out, picking them up when they fly is basically a low effort fix to the problem.
What are they going to do otherwise? Take Greyhound?
If someone is a know illegal who has already been ordered out, picking them up when they fly is basically a low effort fix to the problem.
What are they going to do otherwise? Take Greyhound?
Posted on 3/25/26 at 10:02 am to novabill
quote:
What is the benefit of nabbing someone leaving on their own?
Yeah, they were probably planning to catch the ferry to guatamala in Miami.
Posted on 3/25/26 at 10:11 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
Imagine thinking you are so brave and a champion of humanity to lie and be dishonest about illegals entering your country and siphoning off your tax dollars
I will never understand that line of thinking
I will never understand that line of thinking
Posted on 3/25/26 at 10:29 am to FearlessFreep
quote:
the bigger question for me is, how were she and her daughter (no age given) supporting themselves?
And were they receiving government aid?
Posted on 3/25/26 at 10:54 am to Penrod
I would like our progressive friends to answer this.
If I move to Spain because I believe my life will be better and overstay my VISA, should I be upset for being deported once discovered?
If I move to Spain because I believe my life will be better and overstay my VISA, should I be upset for being deported once discovered?
Posted on 3/25/26 at 11:11 am to novabill
quote:
What is the benefit of nabbing someone leaving on their own?
Someone leaving on their own? You mean, illegals living here illegally and just traveling around within and into / out of the country as they please with no impedements? What's the benefit of nabbing them?
Making sure they don't continue to live here and take advantage of rights of American citizens while being criminal non-citizens who are here illegally. Letting them know their illegal actions have consequences and they're not free to do whatever they please and ignore our nation's laws. For starters.
Posted on 3/25/26 at 11:12 am to SallysHuman
quote:
quote:
What is the benefit of nabbing someone leaving on their own?
She was going to Miami... now she's going to Guatemala.
Also, this way, she has the official express DISinvitation to come back.
Or maybe admin47 wanted two more scalps on the official scoreboard.
Who cares? Two more gone.
Posted on 3/25/26 at 11:26 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
quote:
Democratic officials recoiled this week at the detention. Mr. Garamendi, a Democrat, said that it was the latest example of how the Trump administration was rounding up mothers and children instead of focusing its immigration enforcement on dangerous criminals.
I'm sorry, but I'm not moving the goalposts on this one. I voted for Trump to deport illegal immigrants.
ALL illegal immigrants. I don't care if they follow the law after they came here. Their being here, without having gone through the legal process, is a criminal felony violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1325, and the democrats fighting to keep them here are blatantly guilty of criminal violations of 8 U.S.C. § 1324.
Deport them all, criminal politicians included.
Posted on 3/25/26 at 11:52 am to Adam Banks
quote:
quote:
She had no criminal history, though she entered the country illegally.
How can someone write this sentence?
I can understand saying no history of violent crime but this? Pure propaganda
"In this house, no person is 'Illegal' (on stolen land)."
Posted on 3/25/26 at 11:54 am to Mickey Goldmill
quote:
Seems like it was done calmly and humanely.
Implying that ICE is just running around, aside from this one case, and acting wrecklessly and inhumanely.
Such bullshite.
Posted on 3/25/26 at 12:08 pm to novabill
Even if they were leaving on their own volition, they'd still need to be processed and tagged with being here illegally. They might also receive some type of credit or benefit for returning on their own.
Why can't people follow the rules? That is if they were returning to Guatemala on their own, which they weren't.
Why can't people follow the rules? That is if they were returning to Guatemala on their own, which they weren't.
Popular
Back to top



0












