Started By
Message

re: Trump’s Civil RICO suit dismissed

Posted on 9/9/22 at 8:09 am to
Posted by AUCom96
Alabama
Member since May 2020
6996 posts
Posted on 9/9/22 at 8:09 am to
quote:

I have an issue with classifying judges by who appointed them and suggesting that alone is dispositive of the outcome of the case. That’s a dangerous road to go down.




That road has been gone down already.
Posted by imjustafatkid
Alabama
Member since Dec 2011
65743 posts
Posted on 9/9/22 at 8:14 am to
quote:

I think you would be surprised, the suits based on law and EVIDENCE get heard everyday.


Clearly not.
Posted by lsu13lsu
Member since Jan 2008
11817 posts
Posted on 9/9/22 at 8:15 am to
Funny how you never drag up in threads or start them on all the bogus crap written, filed, and lawyered against Trump.
Posted by lsu13lsu
Member since Jan 2008
11817 posts
Posted on 9/9/22 at 8:16 am to
quote:

I have an issue with classifying judges by who appointed them and suggesting that alone is dispositive of the outcome of the case. That’s a dangerous road to go down.


We should ignore reality because it is dangerous?
Posted by loogaroo
Welsh
Member since Dec 2005
42227 posts
Posted on 9/9/22 at 8:16 am to
Judge Donald Middlebrooks


quote:

Middlebrooks is a United States District Judge of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida. Middlebrooks was nominated by President William J. Clinton on January 7, 1997, to a seat vacated by James W. Kehoe. He was confirmed by the United States Senate on May 23, 1997, and received his commission on May 27, 1997.
Posted by BBONDS25
Member since Mar 2008
59461 posts
Posted on 9/9/22 at 8:18 am to
quote:

I note that Plaintiff filed this lawsuit in the Fort Pierce division of this District, where only one federal judge sits: Judge Aileen Cannon, who Plaintiff appointed in 2020. Despite the odds, this case landed with me instead. And when Plaintiff is a litigant before a judge that he himself appointed, he does not tend to advance these same sorts of bias concerns,” Middlebrooks wrote in April.


makes the judge look petty and biased…not Trump. Oof. What an unprofessional paragraph. The law clerk must have slipped this one bye.
Posted by loogaroo
Welsh
Member since Dec 2005
42227 posts
Posted on 9/9/22 at 8:19 am to
I guess it's purely coincidental the case gets dismissed after they seize all the evidence.
Posted by BBONDS25
Member since Mar 2008
59461 posts
Posted on 9/9/22 at 8:19 am to
quote:

I have an issue with classifying judges by who appointed them and suggesting that alone is dispositive of the outcome of the case. That’s a dangerous road to go down.


Non-responsive. Do you have an issue with the legal reasoning in Cannon’s ruling?
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
128773 posts
Posted on 9/9/22 at 8:20 am to
It’s because boosie is a piece of shite. Solved your mystery.
Posted by BBONDS25
Member since Mar 2008
59461 posts
Posted on 9/9/22 at 8:20 am to
quote:

I think you would be surprised, the suits based on law and EVIDENCE get heard everyday.


Are you saying there is no evidence Hillary orchestrated the Russia hoax?
Posted by roadGator
DeBoar’s dome
Member since Feb 2009
157696 posts
Posted on 9/9/22 at 8:20 am to
Huge win for you people. Congrats.
Posted by Wednesday
Member since Aug 2017
17278 posts
Posted on 9/9/22 at 8:24 am to
Agreed.

It’s defamatory but not RICO.
Posted by SDVTiger
Cabo San Lucas
Member since Nov 2011
97941 posts
Posted on 9/9/22 at 8:25 am to
Did an attorney represent Drumpf in this case?


Im assuming he hires the worst of the worst for these types of results
Posted by SouthEasternKaiju
SouthEast... you figure it out
Member since Aug 2021
47039 posts
Posted on 9/9/22 at 8:29 am to
The people who are calling this a doomed case from the start and that the judge ruled properly are the same why vilify R v W being overturned.

The “correct“ outcome is determined not to by law or statute or precedent, but by personal feelings towards Trump.
Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
167180 posts
Posted on 9/9/22 at 8:29 am to
quote:

Isn't it funny how this brought all of them out of the woodwork again?

quote:

says the guy making eye contact with Vox while both are masturbating furiously that “This is it! Nothing can stop what’s cumming!” Enjoy your limp biscuit, big dog.


Update on this. The DOJ removed mostly all of the dirty cop coup plotters from the lawsuit. Then it was said they were to remove themselves.

Plus Trump's lawyers forgot a technicality on a filing and almost got it tossed last week.

What will their new goal post be after Durham is a dud and devolution never happens?
quote:

There's clearly some strategic angle to venue and the firm filing the suit for Trump. I'm curious if this is going to draw on work already done by Huber/Durham.
Is Huber with Sessions & Durham in the Keebler elf tree?





Posted by Wolfhound45
Member since Nov 2009
127369 posts
Posted on 9/9/22 at 8:34 am to
quote:

Imagine rooting for Hillary.
Posted by loogaroo
Welsh
Member since Dec 2005
42227 posts
Posted on 9/9/22 at 8:35 am to
quote:

Middlebrooks was the judge who ruled against George W. Bush in the Florida elections dispute in 2000, and was overruled by the US Supreme Court
Posted by Wolfhound45
Member since Nov 2009
127369 posts
Posted on 9/9/22 at 8:36 am to
quote:

You still all in on Russia gate Decatur?
You know he is.
Posted by ItNeverRains
Offugeaux
Member since Oct 2007
28166 posts
Posted on 9/9/22 at 8:48 am to
quote:

Non-responsive. Do you have an issue with the legal reasoning in Cannon’s ruling?


His reasoning is a churched up diatribe that in its purest form is OMB.

Democrats and lawyers are very similar in that they both enjoy arguing against common sense. It’s why they attract each other.

Common sense - There are only two genders.

Lawyers and Democrats - Not so fast my friend.
Posted by KiwiHead
Auckland, NZ
Member since Jul 2014
37503 posts
Posted on 9/9/22 at 9:09 am to
Where's the injury? Did Trump not get inaugurated? Was he not President? Was he scammed out of money or property? Did someone conspire to murder him with another party?

It's not RICO. It may be defamation. File the right fricking way citing relevant statutes if you want to try to win. shite like this makes him and his lawyers look stupid!
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram