- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Trump willing to end war without opening Hormuz Strait - WSJ
Posted on 3/31/26 at 7:15 am to SludgeFactory
Posted on 3/31/26 at 7:15 am to SludgeFactory
quote:
So "this" time they aren't lying with their unnamed sources?
Maybe, maybe not. I see you ignored my statement about Trump’s own statements this morning.
quote:
No thanks. Maybe you and your buddies will get lucky and have some troops die today. That will give you something to celebrate and start more negative threads about.
Posted on 3/31/26 at 7:18 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
To keep our economy going?
We don't produce enough of the type of oil that we need for our refineries. We have to import 6-8M barrels per day to keep things going.
We are a net petroleum exporter. A major part of our export production is light sweet crude. Light sweet crude brings in more dollars than heavy crude. It can be converted into more products.
So even if we were not a net petroleum exporter, and instead had an import-export balance in which we were bringing in as much heavy crude by volume as we were exporting light sweet crude, it would still work out well for us.
This post was edited on 3/31/26 at 7:19 am
Posted on 3/31/26 at 7:18 am to LemmyLives
quote:
The UK with their 2 functional destroyers, the French, and the pitiful shite that is the German navy, China, etc., can all figure it out on their own
We fricked it up but somehow it’s their problem to resolve?
Posted on 3/31/26 at 7:19 am to Indefatigable
quote:
We fricked it up but somehow it’s their problem to resolve?
Not only that. This negative externality is a reason why they didn't want to engage. We engage irrationally, create the shite sandwich, derail the global oil economy, and tell them, "tough titty should have helped us hurt you all along"
Absolutely insane
Posted on 3/31/26 at 7:20 am to Indefatigable
quote:
We fricked it up but somehow it’s their problem to resolve?
The Trump Doctrine
Posted on 3/31/26 at 7:20 am to rmnldr
quote:
officials with knowledge on the matter
Every time.
Posted on 3/31/26 at 7:21 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
This Iran thing has just been amazing, scary, and sad to watch.
So many here that laughed at people on the left that were terrified of Covid and were mad at the government's reactions, have now used the fear factor to justify the government's actions for war.
Posted on 3/31/26 at 7:21 am to msutiger
quote:
This is all market manipulation. The uncertainty and mixed messaging is intentional and have kept things from spiraling. I am curious how long they can keep this up before the markets stop reacting to every message coming out of Washington.
I agree with this. I don’t think “negotiations are going well” and “war will be wrapped up soon” are getting traction any more.
Posted on 3/31/26 at 7:21 am to NC_Tigah
quote:
We are a net petroleum exporter.
40% of the oil used in U.S. refineries is imported.
Posted on 3/31/26 at 7:23 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
We engage irrationally, create the shite sandwich, derail the global oil economy, and tell them, "tough titty should have helped us hurt you all along"
There may have been some appetite to help or at least cooperation on getting the oil flowing, but we didn’t tell anyone ahead of time.
Posted on 3/31/26 at 7:25 am to Indefatigable
Let me clarify that I don't think that was the admin's actual plan.
I'm responding to the shitty argument.
I believe this is "market manipulation" as stated before. PR trying to impact the global markets b/c of how bad this situation has been for the global/domestic economies.
I'm responding to the shitty argument.
I believe this is "market manipulation" as stated before. PR trying to impact the global markets b/c of how bad this situation has been for the global/domestic economies.
Posted on 3/31/26 at 7:26 am to imjustafatkid
quote:
officials with knowledge on the matter
Every time.
Yup and the Soy Brigade led by SFP are lapping it up
All the usual suspects have their panties in a bunch up in here
Posted on 3/31/26 at 7:27 am to SDVTiger
quote:
Yup and the Soy Brigade led by SFP are lapping it up
Showing you can't read as always.
Posted on 3/31/26 at 7:27 am to RazorBroncs
quote:
We don't NEED the oil that passes through the strait, the rest of the world does. We produce enough to be independent and then some.
Just remember, even though we're "energy independent" and ourselves aren't dependent on oil that passes through, it doesn't mean that we wouldn't be affected at the pump if it remains closed. We still import crude oil due to needing different blends, and even our oil at home is part of the free market and priced globally.
Sustained $100 WTI would sure guarantee better raises and bonuses for my industry than this past cycle, but not sure about the overall effect to our economy. I do think our economy can blow and go and keep growing at sustained $80. Just not sure about triple digits.
Also, we’re still a net importer of crude oil. We’re a net exporter of “total petroleum product”.
Posted on 3/31/26 at 7:27 am to Indefatigable
quote:Negative!
We fricked it up
Control of Hormuz was always on the Iranian scorecard. They just needed enough of a backing military threat to be able to pull it off.
But the move was inevitable.
Better to bring it to head now, with an absolutely decimated, Iranian military force, then to wait until Iran had nukes, and missiles which could reach Paris. We did the EU a big favor. Now if they get off their butts, they can finish the job, or they can leave the straits functionally closed.
Posted on 3/31/26 at 7:27 am to rmnldr
Spent billions, lost 13 lives with over 300 wounded, Iran was not an imminent threat to US soil, extremism still rules Iran and that won't change, sealed the fate in the mid-terms, considering conceding the control of the strait of Hormuz which will just allow Iran to control it and make money to finance extremism.
And Trump calls it a victory.
And Trump calls it a victory.
Posted on 3/31/26 at 7:28 am to NC_Tigah
quote:
Negative!
Control of Hormuz was always on the Iranian scorecard. They just needed enough of a backing military threat to be able to pull it off.
But the move was inevitable.
Better to bring it to head now, with an absolutely decimated, Iranian military force, then to wait until Iran had nukes, and missiles which could reach Paris. We did the EU a big favor. Now if they get off their butts, they can finish the job, or they can leave the straits functionally closed.
quote:
This Iran thing has just been amazing, scary, and sad to watch.
Posted on 3/31/26 at 7:28 am to Mo Jeaux
quote:Perhaps you did not read what I wrote. Give it another try.
40% of the oil used in U.S. refineries is imported.
Popular
Back to top


1










