Started By
Message

re: Trump wants to end capital gains tax on housing, specifically primary residences

Posted on 7/22/25 at 12:14 pm to
Posted by FMtTXtiger
Member since Oct 2018
5322 posts
Posted on 7/22/25 at 12:14 pm to
most people unless you are extremely wealth wont benefit from this Would rather see fed work with states to do more on property tax rates getting out of control.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
477251 posts
Posted on 7/22/25 at 12:14 pm to
quote:

Not everyone is dealing with 250k-500k mobile park properties like you

That's the profits, not cost of the property. Very few people deal with those profit levels (5% or less, see another post in this thread).

And, again, the cost basis of the new property is the purchase price.

Why do you need a "1031" for this scenario? You've yet to explain.

Posted by HubbaBubba
North of DFW, TX
Member since Oct 2010
51893 posts
Posted on 7/22/25 at 12:19 pm to
The Marxist will have a huge fit.
Posted by SloaneRanger
Upper Hurstville
Member since Jan 2014
13799 posts
Posted on 7/22/25 at 12:32 pm to
Most of these “gains” are just inflation. Shouldn’t be taxed.
Posted by DallasTiger11
Los Angeles
Member since Mar 2004
13560 posts
Posted on 7/22/25 at 12:35 pm to
quote:

most people unless you are extremely wealth wont benefit from this Would rather see fed work with states to do more on property tax rates getting out of control.

Yep this is something that sounds great in theory but has very little benefit to most Americans. Banning foreign investment in real estate and putting a tax on secondary and investment properties would have a much greater effect.
Posted by The Eric
Member since Sep 2008
24416 posts
Posted on 7/22/25 at 12:49 pm to
If I own something, why should I or someone else have to pay taxes on it being exchanged.

Taxes across the board are stupid.

Posted by Teauxler
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2010
3826 posts
Posted on 7/22/25 at 12:55 pm to
End property tax on second homes
Posted by wareagle7298
Birmingham
Member since Dec 2013
3671 posts
Posted on 7/22/25 at 12:56 pm to
I would just change the levels for single/married from like 250/500 to 500/750 or something. I have been in my current house for 21 years, cost 330, and in a few years could possibly go over the 500K capital gain limit, but even at that I would guess only the small portion that would be over 500K would be taxed.
Posted by SlayTime
Member since Jan 2025
3738 posts
Posted on 7/22/25 at 12:56 pm to
LFG!!!
Posted by Vacherie Saint
Member since Aug 2015
47628 posts
Posted on 7/22/25 at 12:58 pm to
Love this.

I would also like to see retirement distributions taxed as cap gains and not ordinary income
Posted by NineLineBind
LA....no, the other one
Member since May 2020
8639 posts
Posted on 7/22/25 at 12:59 pm to
quote:

He keeps them on the wrong side of the 80/20 split

I doubt it’s even 20%. More like 98/2.
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
139071 posts
Posted on 7/22/25 at 1:00 pm to
quote:

Trump wants to end capital gains tax on housing, specifically primary residences
That's not fair! Schiff would get two.
Posted by LSURussian
Member since Feb 2005
134944 posts
Posted on 7/22/25 at 1:01 pm to
I thought this was passed years ago and applied to selling your primary dwelling once every 5 years??
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
139071 posts
Posted on 7/22/25 at 1:11 pm to
quote:

I thought this was passed years ago and applied to selling your primary dwelling once every 5 years??
Nah.
In the old days rollovers were protected as a one-off.

Now it's up to $500K in profits once every two years (no rollover required).

Currently, for the vast majority, there is no cap gains exposure with home sales as things stand. This proposal is not something which would benefit Joe-SixPack.
This post was edited on 7/22/25 at 1:14 pm
Posted by C
Houston
Member since Dec 2007
28250 posts
Posted on 7/22/25 at 1:55 pm to
I would at least expand it - something like $50k exclusion for each year you live in the home beyond 5 years. For the 1031 I assume they mean you shouldn’t have to pay taxes if you use the money as a down payment on a new home. Makes perfect sense.
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
139071 posts
Posted on 7/22/25 at 1:59 pm to
quote:

For the 1031 I assume they mean you shouldn’t have to pay taxes if you use the money as a down payment on a new home. Makes perfect sense.
But to LSURussian's point, unless profits on a home sale exceed $500K, there is no tax currently.
Posted by C
Houston
Member since Dec 2007
28250 posts
Posted on 7/22/25 at 7:56 pm to
The current exclusion level was established in the 90s. Surely inflation itself drives the discussion to expand. It never made sense that the exclusion was the same for 2 or 20 years
Posted by dat yat
Chef Pass
Member since Jun 2011
4975 posts
Posted on 7/22/25 at 8:22 pm to
The current law is already great for most homeowners. A select few high rollers exceed the $250k/$500k limits after 2 years. If it allowed unlimited gains after a decade, that would make sense.
Posted by DEG
Atlanta
Member since Jul 2009
10861 posts
Posted on 7/22/25 at 8:25 pm to
I’m here for it, but what’s the trade-off
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram