- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Trump Wants to Disregard Constitution
Posted on 10/31/18 at 12:10 am to Ebbandflow
Posted on 10/31/18 at 12:10 am to Ebbandflow
quote:
Being born here to become a u.s. citizen is the law, jackass. Trying to change that just proves exactly how xenophobic you actually are.
so ignorant. When did this become the case. What is the legal precedent and what did those who enacted the amendment say? Moron. Oh. And what did Harry Reid say about birthright citizens in the 90s? Your ignorance knows no bounds. Why didn’t you do a modicum if research that doesn’t involve a “news” article. I know you won’t be able to understand it...but you could at least try. 
0
Posted on 10/31/18 at 12:10 am to RockyMtnTigerWDE
quote:
It’s the perceived law. It has never been challenged to exclude babies born to non citizens. That is what path we will be headed towards eventually. Trump and team are reading the 14th as the author of the bill meant for it to be read, and soon the Supreme Court will rule on it once it makes its way to them. You can bet it will end up there.
Actually the US Fed Gov has used it in case law.
USA vs Wong. In it, the US Gov used the illegal tactic. Basically asserted his parents were wards of China.
The SCOTUS ruled against them stating the parents were legally domiciled.
In law, domicile is the status or attribution of being a lawful permanent resident in a particular jurisdiction.
The fed Gov knew that if they proved the parents were illegal, then he would NOT be given citizenship. It's why they argued it.
Posted on 10/31/18 at 12:12 am to Ebbandflow
quote:
Lol. Oh really? So it only pertains to people coming from other countries, having a child here, and then that child being American? No shite Sherlock. I'm glad we got the "American citizens children are American" part out of the way. Lol
Well, the 14th Amendment requires the child be “subject to the jurisdiction” of the United States. A prudent, non-ignorant idiot, would ponder what is the definition as it pertains to the 14th of “subject to the jurisdiction”. There is quite a bit out there on it. Of course, you don’t know that. Because you are an idiot.
Posted on 10/31/18 at 12:13 am to SDVTiger
quote:
That's a solid melt. Stop lying. It's not good for your soul
Yeah go to your room and think about what youve done. Maybe read a book while you're there.
Posted on 10/31/18 at 12:13 am to Jjdoc
quote:
...it is about illegal immigrants
Please explain.
Posted on 10/31/18 at 12:15 am to Ebbandflow
quote:
Please explain.
Under the jurisdiction of he US definition as it applies to the 14th does not include children born to illegal aliens who are citizens of foreign countries. Under the jurisdiction referred to loyalty to the US and no loyalty bestowed by citizenship to another country. Of course that’s just what the authors of the amendment and the courts have said. What do they know. They need ebb to explain it to them.
Now please apologize to the board for being such a douche when you were simply ignorant.
This post was edited on 10/31/18 at 12:17 am
Posted on 10/31/18 at 12:18 am to Ebbandflow
Rabble rabble rabble that's unconstitutional!! Rabble rabble rabble.
Rabble rabble On a side note, we need to ban guns and free speech. Rabble rabble rabble.
Rabble rabble On a side note, we need to ban guns and free speech. Rabble rabble rabble.
Posted on 10/31/18 at 12:26 am to Ebbandflow
quote:
You guys have always been xenophobic.
Nobody embraced the Eugenics movement more than the "founder of modern liberalism" and the original "Progressive"...Woodrow Wilson
Posted on 10/31/18 at 12:30 am to Ebbandflow
quote:
Please explain.
Sure.
If you come here legally, per the SCOTUS, and you have a baby, that baby IS a citizen.
If you come here illegally and you have a baby, that baby is NOT a US citizen.
There is no case law on illegal immigration and anchor babies of illegals. However, there is a case where the Federal Gov did argue that the the parents were illegal and therefore the defendant can not be a citizen.
The Fed gov would have never argued that if that was not a understanding.
That case was USA vs Wong. In it, the Fed gov stated that Wong's parents were not legal and wards of China not the USA. Wong won the case by convincing the SCOTUS that his parents were legal. The SCOTUS stated that his perents were legally domiciled.
In law, domiciled means a lawful permanent resident in a particular jurisdiction.
So we have a case where the gov argued the illegal status... had they convinced the court he would not have had been awarded citizenship.
Posted on 10/31/18 at 1:30 am to Jake88
quote:
It is difficult to take anyone seriously when they use such a stupid, trite, mindless word.
Ebb wouldn’t even know the word xenophobic if WaPo didn’t tell him to use it.
Posted on 10/31/18 at 1:33 am to Ebbandflow
quote:
Trump wants to disregard the 14th Amendment
Nope.
Posted on 10/31/18 at 1:56 am to Ebbandflow
quote:FIFY...
Trump wants to establish the meaning of the 14th Amendment through test in the Supreme Court, which itself was established by the Constitution to settle such questions, with an executive order.
Posted on 10/31/18 at 3:09 am to Ebbandflow
quote:No.quote:Made up.
for illegal immigrant votes
But then the additional problem is their inclusion in the Census which determines states US Representative allotments. Each House of Representatives member represents about 750,000 people. 22 million illegals obviously account for 29 House members.
Assuming most/all of those fall to Democrat seats, a near certainty, illegal aliens may well be responsible for flipping the House next week.
So your "made up" line rings patently false.
Posted on 10/31/18 at 3:23 am to Ebbandflow
quote:Do you wake up each morning in breathless anticipation of what you are going to complain about when it comes to Trump? That you are going to resist another day?
Ebbandflow
Don’t be that guy. Seriously.
Posted on 10/31/18 at 4:29 am to Ebbandflow
quote:
At least you don't fake moral superiority anymore
no one needs to fake being morally superior to today's Democrat leadership.
Posted on 10/31/18 at 4:55 am to Ebbandflow
quote:
Trump Wants to Disregard Constitution
Title is a lie
Posted on 10/31/18 at 5:25 am to Ebbandflow
Stop worrying about future votes for Dems.
Posted on 10/31/18 at 5:28 am to Ebbandflow
No. He doesn't.
Why must you lie?
Why must you lie?
Posted on 10/31/18 at 5:39 am to Ebbandflow
Why must you lie?
Page 3 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News