- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Trump Wants to Disregard Constitution
Posted on 10/31/18 at 9:59 am to BBONDS25
Posted on 10/31/18 at 9:59 am to BBONDS25
quote:
Under the jurisdiction of he US definition as it applies to the 14th does not include children born to illegal aliens who are citizens of foreign countries. Under the jurisdiction referred to loyalty to the US and no loyalty bestowed by citizenship to another country. Of course that’s just what the authors of the amendment and the courts have said. What do they know. They need ebb to explain it to them.
There was no such thing as an "illegal alien" when the 14th Amendment was drafted.
Because, you know, the founders of our country actually believed in *gasp* open borders.
1
Posted on 10/31/18 at 10:04 am to WildTchoupitoulas
quote:
There was no such thing as an "illegal alien" when the 14th Amendment was drafted.
Because, you know, the founders of our country actually believed in *gasp* open borders.
They also believed in citizens being the Army hence the right to bear arms
Posted on 10/31/18 at 10:22 am to RobbBobb
quote:
And where is it spelled out in the Constitution that a single female has the right to deny life and liberty to a 6 month old fetus? Because you brain dead tards have been ignoring that fact for 50 years.
And since the SC has the same ability to 'find' and fix this part of the Constitution, Trump wont be wrong then, will he?
Lolol. Wtf are you blathering on about? People historically haven't counted until they're born so I don't know what the hell you're talking about.
Posted on 10/31/18 at 10:22 am to BBONDS25
quote:
Well, the 14th Amendment requires the child be “subject to the jurisdiction” of the United States. A prudent, non-ignorant idiot, would ponder what is the definition as it pertains to the 14th of “subject to the jurisdiction”. There is quite a bit out there on it. Of course, you don’t know that. Because you are an idiot.
Statute, by birth within U.S. Edit
United States Federal law (8 U.S.C. § 1401) defines who is a United States citizen from birth. The following are among those listed there as persons who shall be nationals and citizens of the United States at birth:
"a person born in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof" or
"a person born in the United States to a member of an Indian, Eskimo, Aleutian, or other aboriginal tribe" (see Indian Citizenship Act of 1924).
"a person of unknown parentage found in the United States while under the age of five years, until shown, prior to his attaining the age of twenty-one years, not to have been born in the United States"
"a person born in an outlying possession of the United States of parents one of whom is a citizen of the United States who has been physically present in the United States or one of its outlying possessions for a continuous period of one year at any time prior to the birth of such person"
Look everybody. It's a lawyer getting owned again
Posted on 10/31/18 at 10:23 am to Jjdoc
Statute, by birth within U.S. Edit
United States Federal law (8 U.S.C. § 1401) defines who is a United States citizen from birth. The following are among those listed there as persons who shall be nationals and citizens of the United States at birth:
"a person born in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof" or
"a person born in the United States to a member of an Indian, Eskimo, Aleutian, or other aboriginal tribe" (see Indian Citizenship Act of 1924).
"a person of unknown parentage found in the United States while under the age of five years, until shown, prior to his attaining the age of twenty-one years, not to have been born in the United States"
"a person born in an outlying possession of the United States of parents one of whom is a citizen of the United States who has been physically present in the United States or one of its outlying possessions for a continuous period of one year at any time prior to the birth of such person"
I will have your Crow ready for you
United States Federal law (8 U.S.C. § 1401) defines who is a United States citizen from birth. The following are among those listed there as persons who shall be nationals and citizens of the United States at birth:
"a person born in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof" or
"a person born in the United States to a member of an Indian, Eskimo, Aleutian, or other aboriginal tribe" (see Indian Citizenship Act of 1924).
"a person of unknown parentage found in the United States while under the age of five years, until shown, prior to his attaining the age of twenty-one years, not to have been born in the United States"
"a person born in an outlying possession of the United States of parents one of whom is a citizen of the United States who has been physically present in the United States or one of its outlying possessions for a continuous period of one year at any time prior to the birth of such person"
I will have your Crow ready for you
Posted on 10/31/18 at 5:48 pm to WildTchoupitoulas
quote:
Progressive" president was Teddy Roosevelt, a Republican.
Wilson virtually redefined the term and wasnt close to
WW as far Eugenics,forced sterilization etc.
Page 5 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News