- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Trump posts doctored photo of the Obamas and AFOne with graffiti spray-painted on
Posted on 7/6/26 at 12:55 pm to Eurocat
Posted on 7/6/26 at 12:55 pm to Eurocat
quote:
No, but they are made to be criminal ghetto trash in yet another beneath the dignity of the office post by the current President.
They're not criminal ghetto trash. They're high-class and well-funded trash that were manufactured by your overlords in the Bilderberg Group and the rest of the Globalist Deep State.
Posted on 7/6/26 at 12:57 pm to CrystalPreserves
quote:
A demonstration of the same ol’ maga reflex: when the case fails, blame the court; when the evidence fails, blame the forum; when the law doesn’t bend, call it cowardice
If you are not smart enough to know that
No standing =/= failed case
Then why are you here?
Posted on 7/6/26 at 12:57 pm to NC_Tigah
That’s exactly the reflex.
Texas v. Pennsylvania did fail. It failed because the Court rejected it for lack of standing. You may dislike the reason, but disliking the reason does not mean the case secretly survived in some alternate courtroom. Texas needed a legal injury.
The issue is simple: Texas needed a legal injury. It didn’t have one. So the case failed. Everything after that is just smoke and hand-waving around the one fact that matters.
Texas v. Pennsylvania did fail. It failed because the Court rejected it for lack of standing. You may dislike the reason, but disliking the reason does not mean the case secretly survived in some alternate courtroom. Texas needed a legal injury.
The issue is simple: Texas needed a legal injury. It didn’t have one. So the case failed. Everything after that is just smoke and hand-waving around the one fact that matters.
This post was edited on 7/6/26 at 1:04 pm
Posted on 7/6/26 at 12:59 pm to CrystalPreserves
quote:
Texas needed a legal injury. It didn’t have one.
Posted on 7/6/26 at 1:02 pm to NC_Tigah
Well, I guess when the horse won’t run, laughing at the saddle is all you have left.
Posted on 7/6/26 at 1:05 pm to Eurocat
AP thinks graffiti is racist. Apparently they think only black people are responsible for graffiti
Posted on 7/6/26 at 1:17 pm to CrystalPreserves
quote:
CrystalPreserves
You've been in this thread bleeding on every page since 5:30 this morning.
Don't you think 8 hours of crying is enough?
Posted on 7/6/26 at 1:21 pm to wookalar1013
It seems as though your candidate in Maine shares your personal interests. He needs your support.
Posted on 7/6/26 at 1:41 pm to jimmy the leg
quote:
It seems as though your candidate in Maine shares your personal interests. He needs your support
My candidate? I don’t live in Maine
My personal interests? Have we met? Or are you just making things up again to prop up your flimsy “arguments’?
We both know the answer
Posted on 7/6/26 at 2:11 pm to wookalar1013
quote:
Have we met?
quote:
are you just making things up
It is called a post history.
quote:
My candidate? I don’t live in Maine
He represents your ilk.
Posted on 7/6/26 at 2:43 pm to jimmy the leg
quote:
He represents your ilk.
Dennis Hastert represented the GOP for years, rising damn near to the top. Does that mean you support sexually abusing underage boys and buying their silence? I would hope not but that’s how dumb the point you’re struggling to make is
Posted on 7/6/26 at 2:55 pm to CrystalPreserves
quote:
CrystalPreserves
texs diddler alter.
i picked up on her style. she cried about this(muh no fraud) to me in the past also. let me go dig up that thread.
ok this thread was to another poster but on same topic of election fraud.
LINK
FOUND IT! here it is. my post to tex diddler aka crystal preserves
LINK
This post was edited on 7/6/26 at 2:56 pm
Posted on 7/6/26 at 3:02 pm to Eurocat
So the older plane was painted in its shadow of blue to blend in with the sky? I didn't know. So it was for national security. And Trump's blue won't do.
Posted on 7/6/26 at 3:16 pm to wookalar1013
quote:
My candidate? I don’t live in Maine
My personal interests? Have we met? Or are you just making things up again to prop up your flimsy “arguments’?
We both know the answer
You are part of the hive mind. If he was the difference in the democrats controlling the senate you would most certainly support.
Posted on 7/6/26 at 3:20 pm to jimmy the leg
quote:
It is called a post history.
Posted on 7/6/26 at 3:30 pm to jimmy the leg
quote:
He represents your ilk.
ILK!
Posted on 7/6/26 at 3:48 pm to RohanGonzales
quote:
You are part of the hive mind. If he was the difference in the democrats controlling the senate you would most certainly support.
I would never in a million years vote for Platner. Again, just making things up to suit your narrative.
Hive mind indeed
Posted on 7/6/26 at 3:51 pm to wookalar1013
quote:You'd vote for the GOP candidate?
I would never in a million years vote for Platner.
Posted on 7/6/26 at 3:52 pm to Warrior Court
quote:
ILK
Even small words too big for you? Not surprised.
Posted on 7/6/26 at 4:07 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
You'd vote for the GOP candidate?
I would. I’ve voted for plenty of GOP candidates - locally, state and nationally. Crazy I know
Popular
Back to top



0







