- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Trump: Payments to silence women were a ‘simple private transaction
Posted on 12/10/18 at 8:55 am
Posted on 12/10/18 at 8:55 am
WaPo Link
quote:
President Trump asserted Monday that payments to buy the silence of two women about alleged affairs were not illegal campaign contributions, as federal prosecutors contend, but instead a “simple private transaction.”
quote:
He further asserted that even if the payments could be considered campaign contributions, he should be facing a civil case rather than a criminal case. And he said, Cohen should be held responsible, not him.
“Lawyer’s liability if he made a mistake, not me,” Trump wrote. “Cohen just trying to get his sentence reduced. WITCH HUNT!”
Posted on 12/10/18 at 8:57 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
So just another business transaction
Cant wait for the low iq crowd to try and spin this to a felony
Cant wait for the low iq crowd to try and spin this to a felony
Posted on 12/10/18 at 8:57 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
Correct. Liberals lose again

Posted on 12/10/18 at 9:00 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
I mean, it’s better than Hillary’s method of silencing people.
Posted on 12/10/18 at 9:12 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
Reminder: There's a fund that YOU PAY FOR that Congress uses to silence their victims they grope on.
Posted on 12/10/18 at 9:12 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
Looks like Trump is Cleared!

Posted on 12/10/18 at 9:17 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
quote:In most instances, I would agree. As a general rule, I see no problem with paying hush money to a former mistress.
Trump: Payments to silence women were a ‘simple private transaction
When done in order to potentially influence an election, the issue becomes cloudier. It is PROBABLY a minor campaign finance violation. Assess and pay the fine, and move on.
Posted on 12/10/18 at 9:19 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
BUT BUT BUT WE WERE FINALLY GOING TO GET DRUMPF!!!
HE CAN'T KEEP GETTING AWAY WITH IT!!!!!!
HE CAN'T KEEP GETTING AWAY WITH IT!!!!!!
Posted on 12/10/18 at 9:20 am to SDVTiger
quote:
Cant wait for the low iq crowd to try and spin this to a felony
quote:
low iq crowd to try and spin
They've been doing this for awhile
Posted on 12/10/18 at 9:20 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
Trump is a good businessman, limiting them to around $130k each. Dumb broads should have held out for more.
Posted on 12/10/18 at 9:27 am to AggieHank86
quote:
In most instances, I would agree. As a general rule, I see no problem with paying hush money to a former mistress.
When done in order to potentially influence an election, the issue becomes cloudier. It is PROBABLY a minor campaign finance violation. Assess and pay the fine, and move on.
the campaign finance statute specifically EXCLUDES items that would have existed outside the campaign or could have existed for another reason.
insert gif of stocking hot wife here
Posted on 12/10/18 at 9:28 am to AggieHank86
quote:
When done in order to potentially influence an election
Jesus Christ, everything a candidate does is to influence an election...what the frick is wrong with you Lefties?
Posted on 12/10/18 at 9:35 am to AggieHank86
quote:
In most instances, I would agree. As a general rule, I see no problem with paying hush money to a former mistress.
When done in order to potentially influence an election, the issue becomes cloudier. It is PROBABLY a minor campaign finance violation. Assess and pay the fine, and move on.
the campaign finance statute specifically EXCLUDES items that would have existed outside the campaign or could have existed for another reason.
insert gif of smocking hot wife here
Posted on 12/10/18 at 9:36 am to oogabooga68
quote:Which is why the issue becomes cloudier in the context of an election or campaign.
Jesus Christ, everything a candidate does is to influence an election...
Posted on 12/10/18 at 9:36 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
Cohen is an idiot. He would have been pardoned had he not gotten in bed with Lanny Davis.
Posted on 12/10/18 at 9:41 am to AggieHank86
quote:
When done in order to potentially influence an election, the issue becomes cloudier. It is PROBABLY a minor campaign finance violation. Assess and pay the fine, and move on.
You need to read the WaPo piece by Former chair of the FEC, Bradley Smith. Add into the fact that if Trump can prove he has done this before ever announcing his candidacy, it will be next to impossible to prove that it was anything more than a business transaction!
Posted on 12/10/18 at 9:42 am to SDVTiger
quote:
So just another business transaction
Cant wait for the low iq crowd to try and spin this to a felony
Don't be surprised when they do clamor for a crime.
This is the same retarded crowd that is trying to frame Trump having interest in Russian property for his company PRIOR to becoming POTUS as a felony
They don't understand the laws. If it hurts their feelings, it's a crime.
Posted on 12/10/18 at 9:43 am to bamarep
quote:
Reminder: There's a fund that YOU PAY FOR that Congress uses to silence their victims they grope on.
Trump should disclose all payments that have been made from that fund.
You know, for transparency.
Posted on 12/10/18 at 9:44 am to AggieHank86
quote:The extortion of Michael Cohen to plea to a nonexistent violation notwithstanding, when a Trump Organization NDA was performed in the same way its NDAs had been previously done, independent of any election, the issue really is not cloudy at all.
When done in order to potentially influence an election, the issue becomes cloudier.
Popular
Back to top


23















