- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 12/10/18 at 1:41 pm to GeauxxxTigers23
quote:
Do you really care that he fricked around on his wife?
Not a bit. I didn't care about Bill getting sucked off either. I love watching the cult wrapped up in his personality being forced to grapple with reality for once though
Posted on 12/10/18 at 1:45 pm to bmy
That goes both ways. I don’t know why you insist on calling Trump supporters a cult yet refuse to call the leftist ideology a religion, when it clearly is one.
Posted on 12/10/18 at 1:49 pm to brian_wilson
quote:
Well I Am not privy to all the evidence
So, you have no basis for your claim. Got it.
quote:
There is nothing I can say to convince you
Things aren’t illegal simply because you want them to be and because orange man bad.
Are you not aware of the audio tape Cohen surreptitiously took when Trump specifically states that if there is any payment it must be “on the up and up”? Are you aware intent is an element of the alleged crime? Are you aware that if trump entered into similar NDAs prior to becoming a candidate that would be a defense to the allleged crime? Are you aware the alleged violation is that Cohen made a contribution above the limit. That “contribution” was
Reimbursed, yet the SDNY relies on that reimbursement as evidence of wrongdoing? It’s circular and a bootstrap.
You take a statement made by someone the investigators claimed lied to them at every step as truth and satisfaction of required elements by someone else despite all of the evidence to the contrary? That is silly.
Posted on 12/10/18 at 1:50 pm to bmy
quote:
love watching the cult wrapped up in his personality being forced to grapple with reality for once though
What a strange obsession. Reeks of insecurity.
Posted on 12/10/18 at 2:08 pm to bmy
quote:Are you under the impression that people who voted for Trump all thought he was a paragon of sexual virtue?
Not a bit. I didn't care about Bill getting sucked off either. I love watching the cult wrapped up in his personality being forced to grapple with reality for once though
Posted on 12/10/18 at 2:15 pm to ShortyRob
quote:
Are you under the impression that people who voted for Trump all thought he was a paragon of sexual virtue?
bmy continues to show his iq level
More men would have voted for Trump had they known about Macdougal and Stormy
Posted on 12/10/18 at 2:20 pm to SDVTiger
quote:I'm just fascinated by the "grapple with reality" line.
bmy continues to show his iq level
Like, when I heard the news about Trump fricking Stormy, I was crestfallen to discover he cheats on his wife.
The BMY post was classic NPC behavior. They're so used to their narrative that supposedly Republicans think all their leaders are saints that they can't deviate despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary.
Posted on 12/10/18 at 4:14 pm to PsychTiger
quote:
Well, is she stocking hot or smocking hot?
and stroking hot, tbh
Posted on 12/10/18 at 6:12 pm to ShortyRob
quote:
Are you under the impression that people who voted for Trump all thought he was a paragon of sexual virtue?
no but i'm under the impression that they believe he can do no wrong
Posted on 12/10/18 at 6:30 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
The dumbshit leftists are absolutely desperate
total pivot away from their Russians fraud with nary a word
total pivot away from their Russians fraud with nary a word
Posted on 12/10/18 at 6:32 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
quote:
Trump: Payments to silence women were a ‘simple private transaction
Since much of the money to finance Trump's campaign came from his own packet, how would anyone even be able to classify what was or wasn't campaign funds?
Posted on 12/10/18 at 6:35 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
Absolutely a private transaction
Posted on 12/10/18 at 7:15 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
I'm sorry, but this is the kind of shite I (as a conservative) hate about Trump. He is no better than Bill in this arena.
Posted on 12/10/18 at 8:13 pm to CptBengal
quote:I go back and forth as to whether you are THE dumbest poster on this forum ... or simply ONE of the dumbest posters on this forum.
CptBengal
Posted on 12/10/18 at 9:39 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
quote:
Trump: Payments to silence women were a ‘simple private transaction
Except that it happened during his campaign for President, making it a campaign violation (hid it from the American people who had the right to know since he was asking for their vote).
Rightees can poo-poo this all they want, but this isn't going away. Hell, even Trump's own team knows he's in trouble. He's having a hell of a time getting someone to agree to being his next chief of staff.
Posted on 12/10/18 at 9:48 pm to bmy
quote:
Bill getting sucked off either.
I do. There's a difference between stepping out on your wife because you have a chance to shag Karen McDougal, and face fricking a fat, 20 year old subordinate in the oval office.
Posted on 12/10/18 at 9:50 pm to TigersFan64
quote:Um, no. That isn't how this works.
Except that it happened during his campaign for President, making it a campaign violation
Courts disagree with you. See John Edwards.
I'll let the wash examiner editorial board, no friend of trump's and run by nevertrumper seth mandel, do the talking:
quote:
The argument is that since the hush money was paid to “influence” the election, it was a campaign expenditure. But by that logic, every dime Chris Christie spent to lose weight before his 2016 run — the diet books, the StairMaster, the bariatric surgery — was a campaign expenditure. If Christie bought a SlimFast shake with his personal money, was he a felon?
Former Federal Election Commissioner Bradley Smith posited another hypothetical: “If a business owner ran for political office and decided to pay bonuses to his employees in the hope that he would get good press and boost his stock as a candidate, would that be a campaign expenditure, payable from campaign funds?”
If a candidate who normally gets a $12 haircut shells out $40 for a better cut, is he a criminal for paying out of his own pocket even though the idea is to look sharp in front of news cameras? If a candidate pays a contested past-due personal bill only to make the headache go away before the debates begin, is he legally required to pay out of his campaign coffers?
Paying such expenses out of campaign funds would probably be unethical and possibly be illegal. If you're damned if you don't and damned if you do, then it's a pretty good sign that either the law is an arse or someone is not reading it honestly.
Posted on 12/10/18 at 9:51 pm to TigersFan64
quote:
Except that it happened during his campaign for President, making it a campaign violation (hid it from the American people who had the right to know since he was asking for their vote).
This just isn’t true. The elements of the crime and the defenses are clear.
Posted on 12/10/18 at 9:52 pm to TigersFan64
quote:
He's having a hell of a time getting someone to agree to being his next chief of staff.
Because the violent left will make it a priority to ruin that persons life.
Page 5 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News