- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Trump orders release of Epstein documents
Posted on 7/17/25 at 8:19 pm to TheHumanTornado
Posted on 7/17/25 at 8:19 pm to TheHumanTornado
When he said hoax it’s highly likely he was referring to this story that broke today - they have known about it for a few weeks - it all makes sense now why he was reacting like he has
Posted on 7/17/25 at 8:20 pm to Tigers0918
All of the people who broke the law, that is. Dude had a lot of people to his place that were never involved in any of the crazy, evil shite. Like Stephen Hawking for instance. Somehow I doubt he was diddling kids. People have wondered why it took so long? They had to investigate everyone involved with the dude.
Posted on 7/17/25 at 8:20 pm to cajuntiger1010
quote:
Trump the counterpunch
aka check mate
Posted on 7/17/25 at 8:21 pm to cajuntiger1010
some dem judge will step in to stop the the release and keep the drama going
Posted on 7/17/25 at 8:21 pm to cajuntiger1010
Like I said in another thread not hours ago. This is nothing more than a set up to release docs.
Posted on 7/17/25 at 8:21 pm to cajuntiger1010
Time to move on to the next reeee.
Posted on 7/17/25 at 8:21 pm to cajunangelle
Why make your FBI and DOJ look like retards for two weeks? What was the point of the memo that it's a nothingburger?
This post was edited on 7/17/25 at 8:23 pm
Posted on 7/17/25 at 8:21 pm to KingOrange
quote:
Names of victims will not be released
Good, that would be awful otherwise... but why does a judge need to be involved? Ordering victim redaction (and whatever other necessary redactions) seems like something Bondi and team could handle, no?
I honestly have no idea how any of that works.
Just found that hanging it on the whims of a judge seems like it could go sideways and piss off the base (myself included) all over again.
Posted on 7/17/25 at 8:22 pm to SallysHuman
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. They have been playing everyone
This post was edited on 7/17/25 at 8:23 pm
Posted on 7/17/25 at 8:22 pm to davyjones
quote:
Because federal law (and state law for that matter) requires complete secrecy of grand jury proceedings, with limited exceptions subject to court authorization.
Thank you.
What happens if the judge refuses?
Posted on 7/17/25 at 8:22 pm to Jjdoc
But there was no setup needed.
Posted on 7/17/25 at 8:22 pm to Riverside
quote:
You are having a rough night, Adam.
Not at all.
I asked a simple question.
Are they altered or not?
Posted on 7/17/25 at 8:22 pm to SallysHuman
If the judge refuses and it’s done anyway, that would be a violation of federal criminal law.
Posted on 7/17/25 at 8:22 pm to cajuntiger1010
Who decides what’s “pertinent”? Devil is in the details. Release them all. frick disclaimers.
Posted on 7/17/25 at 8:22 pm to Bunk Moreland
You are melting like a snowman in July.
Posted on 7/17/25 at 8:23 pm to Captain Rumbeard
quote:
That is very specific language.
Yep.
Posted on 7/17/25 at 8:23 pm to Tigers0918
quote:
you act like Democrats don't want this.
They obviously don't. They had 4 years to release it all.
Posted on 7/17/25 at 8:23 pm to cajuntiger1010
The disappointment from the substance of this stuff is going to be awesome.
Posted on 7/17/25 at 8:23 pm to cajuntiger1010
So a Grand Jury saw video of big players? Slick Willy? That Prince guy from England? Et al? Epstein Bank Accounts?
Whatever.
Whatever.
Popular
Back to top


0









