Started By
Message

re: Trump on FOX - we're doing away with federal air traffic control

Posted on 6/5/17 at 12:14 pm to
Posted by stelly1025
Lafayette
Member since May 2012
9904 posts
Posted on 6/5/17 at 12:14 pm to
I have worked ATC for the federal contract tower program which are air traffic services managed by private companies. Been having conversations with friends and former co workers both in FAA and FCT facilities. There will be advantages and disadvantages like everything else. There will likely be a phasing out for controllers who are closer to retirement. This has been in the works for a while and it was only a matter of time until privatization happened.
This post was edited on 6/5/17 at 12:17 pm
Posted by KiwiHead
Auckland, NZ
Member since Jul 2014
36071 posts
Posted on 6/5/17 at 12:17 pm to
quote:

Does the Government take care of plane maintenance?


What does that have to do with control of the air? If you've ever paid attention to the air traffic over the major airports in this country, you would know that having competent ATC's is very important. Plus the airport itself is a publicly held operation (for good reason) I'm thinking a guy who does not favor one airline over the other is a GOOD thing
Posted by theenemy
Member since Oct 2006
13078 posts
Posted on 6/5/17 at 12:17 pm to
I'm all for this.

I don't fly, but this puts this expense on people flying instead of taxpayers.
Posted by ninthward
Boston, MA
Member since May 2007
22063 posts
Posted on 6/5/17 at 12:17 pm to
That's it that's all you got ? Not going to elaborate? Just spewing nothing.
Posted by 9th life
birmingham
Member since Sep 2009
7310 posts
Posted on 6/5/17 at 12:20 pm to
quote:

You all know at the first incident they will be calling for Trumps head


Metaphorically calling for his head, but I'm not waiting. Now is fine.
Posted by BamaGradinTn
Murfreesboro
Member since Dec 2008
28789 posts
Posted on 6/5/17 at 12:22 pm to
quote:

So people that use the service are going to be charged instead of all the tax payers?

Works for me.


All tax payers use the service either directly or indirectly.
Posted by Big Scrub TX
Member since Dec 2013
38521 posts
Posted on 6/5/17 at 12:22 pm to
quote:

Trump on FOX - we're doing away with federal air traffic control
Says he's turning it over to the airlines. Airlines have wanted this for about 2 decades. Reason, private control of the business will be better at advancing technology than the slow moving government does.

Winning, again.
The current rate of commercial airline deaths is close to 0. Why mess with success?
Posted by BamaGradinTn
Murfreesboro
Member since Dec 2008
28789 posts
Posted on 6/5/17 at 12:25 pm to
quote:

If you want to shut down the US just put the ATC on strike and ground all flights

A federal judge could make them fly and they would have to comply


You're assuming the judge wouldn't be a liberal appointee that would side with organized labor.
Posted by DevilDogTiger
RTWFY!
Member since Nov 2007
6570 posts
Posted on 6/5/17 at 12:25 pm to
This will improve efficiency of the system. Safety should stay about the same
Posted by Homesick Tiger
Greenbrier, AR
Member since Nov 2006
56127 posts
Posted on 6/5/17 at 12:25 pm to
quote:

Why mess with success?


Something about the airlines claiming government not moving fast enough with the technology out there. Kinda like drugs that are accepted worldwide - except for here in the states.
Posted by HeyHeyHogsAllTheWay
Member since Feb 2017
12458 posts
Posted on 6/5/17 at 12:27 pm to
quote:

You're assuming the judge wouldn't be a liberal appointee that would side with organized labor.


Part of the negotiations can easily include a provision that doesn't allow for these workers to strike. Then , if you don't the idea of taking a ob where you have given up your ability to strike if you are unhappy with said job at a later date, don't take that fricking job.


Posted by Remote Controlled
Member since Apr 2013
6859 posts
Posted on 6/5/17 at 12:36 pm to
I work for the FAA and have spent a large portion of my career implementing NexGen systems. It's a slow moving process because the National Airspace is complex. The funding was severely cut during the govt shutdown as well.

The model will be based on NavCanada, they've been private for a couple decades.

We will have most of our Airspace using NexGen by the time we fold over in 2021. So essentially we are all paying for upgrades that will then be handed over to airlines. Not to mention the NavAids, comm, and radar facilities.
This post was edited on 6/5/17 at 12:36 pm
Posted by Y.A. Tittle
Member since Sep 2003
109811 posts
Posted on 6/5/17 at 12:37 pm to
quote:

The model will be based on NavCanada, they've been private for a couple decades.



This is great.
Posted by Wtodd
Tampa, FL
Member since Oct 2013
68474 posts
Posted on 6/5/17 at 12:39 pm to
quote:

You're assuming the judge wouldn't be a liberal appointee that would side with organized labor.

I almost qualified my statement to include this and that the union would just buy off the judges
Posted by 756
Member since Sep 2004
15788 posts
Posted on 6/5/17 at 12:39 pm to
show me a single government program that is efficient in operation

Hopefully we close the postal service next
Posted by boogiewoogie1978
Little Rock
Member since Aug 2012
19476 posts
Posted on 6/5/17 at 12:40 pm to
quote:

The current rate of commercial airline deaths is close to 0. Why mess with success?


To get reelected of course. "Who cares about lives when we can win."

Airlines will try to get as many planes in the sky as possible to make the most money. No different then cramming as many bodies in the plane as possible.
Posted by Iosh
Bureau of Interstellar Immigration
Member since Dec 2012
18941 posts
Posted on 6/5/17 at 12:43 pm to
quote:

Thune comments

anyone tired of all this winning yet?


I'm guessing soon we'll see "began the process of privatizing ATC" added to Trump's list of accomplishments
This post was edited on 6/5/17 at 12:43 pm
Posted by MrLarson
Member since Oct 2014
34984 posts
Posted on 6/5/17 at 12:45 pm to
quote:

Airlines will try to get as many planes in the sky as possible to make the most money.


Are they going to force people to start flying to accomplish this?


What an ignorant view.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
298231 posts
Posted on 6/5/17 at 12:46 pm to
Get rid of the TSA first
Posted by Remote Controlled
Member since Apr 2013
6859 posts
Posted on 6/5/17 at 12:50 pm to
Right now our focus is on the safety of the NAS, with delays part of that, but of a lesser focus.

I think it will shift towards efficiency and delays. I'm an Ops Manager and I'm the guy that makes decisions regarding wether equipment is operating at safe parameters for use. If it's not, I have no problem making that equipment "Out of Service" and issuing the proper NOTAM. I don't give it a second thought as to wether or not it will cause delays. It's more important to me that planes stay in the sky and arrive safely.

I can see a time when critical decisions will be based on how it will effect the airlines, not the passengers on the planes.
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 7Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram