Started By
Message

re: Trump imposes 20% fee on Hormuz traffic

Posted on 7/14/26 at 12:08 am to
Posted by SDVTiger
Cabo San Lucas
Member since Nov 2011
99332 posts
Posted on 7/14/26 at 12:08 am to
quote:

Do you know what inflation is?


Its obvious that you dont
Posted by RollTide95
Tuscaloosa, AL
Member since Jun 2026
58 posts
Posted on 7/14/26 at 12:10 am to
quote:

Do you know what inflation is? Would it help if I break out in song and dance with a catchy song/nursery rhymes to help spell it out?


Inflation is the expansion of the money supply, which Trump thinks we need even more of. The average American is being buried by rising prices and Trump wants to debase the dollar even more. It takes a lot of commitment to still be a sucker for this bullshite.
Posted by SDVTiger
Cabo San Lucas
Member since Nov 2011
99332 posts
Posted on 7/14/26 at 12:12 am to
quote:

Inflation is the expansion of the money supply, which Trump thinks we need even more of. The average American is being buried by rising prices and Trump wants to debase the dollar even more. It takes a lot of commitment to still be a sucker for this bullshite


Posted by demtigers73
Member since Aug 2014
6202 posts
Posted on 7/14/26 at 6:14 am to
U. S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio firmly stated that “no country is allowed to charge tolls or fees in the Strait of Hormuz, emphasizing that doing so directly violates international maritime law.”

International Law: Rubio stated that under global maritime principles, freedom of passage through international straits cannot be subject to gatekeeping, tolls, or localized fees.

During a June 2026 visit to the United Arab Emirates, Rubio rejected an Iranian proposal to charge transit fees, declaring, "That’s the law. It’s an international waterway. No country is allowed to charge tolls or fees on an international waterway. That’s existing international law. That’s the way it is in international waterways all over the world, and that’s the way we expect it’ll be here."


Good luck with that!
Posted by Semper Gumby
Member since Dec 2021
660 posts
Posted on 7/14/26 at 6:43 am to
quote:

let’s just keep stacking onto the exorbitant amounts of inflation


While this may seem inflationary on the surface in the short term, I’m not sure it will be a long-term issue. The insurers of the tankers have pulled out, so we become the insurer and this 20% is the premium. All the while we are bringing on more Venezuelan oil to the global market; and their production will increase in more investable conditions with Maduro gone. We are also in the process of massively expanding our LNG exports. This seems like a setup for us (the USA) to be the driver of the global energy market.
This post was edited on 7/14/26 at 6:48 am
Posted by Bunk Moreland
Member since Dec 2010
69681 posts
Posted on 7/14/26 at 6:45 am to
I thought we hated international law here?
Posted by lsusteve1
Member since Dec 2004
48273 posts
Posted on 7/14/26 at 7:06 am to
He hasn’t “imposed” anything
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
481024 posts
Posted on 7/14/26 at 7:09 am to
quote:

Complain about the US spending money in Iran. Conplain when Trump starts to earn it back.

Doubling down on bad policy doesn't fix things. It only makes it twice as bad
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
481024 posts
Posted on 7/14/26 at 7:10 am to
quote:

The insurers of the tankers have pulled out, so we become the insurer and this 20% is the premium.

a. That's not what's being proposed.

b. Trump already tried the insurance angle and it failed

Posted by SoFla Tideroller
South Florida
Member since Apr 2010
41594 posts
Posted on 7/14/26 at 8:37 am to
Hasn't inflation cratered the last few months?
Posted by SlidellCajun
Slidell la
Member since May 2019
16719 posts
Posted on 7/14/26 at 10:02 am to
How are we supoosed to levy this fee?

And is this even legal?
Posted by Decatur
Member since Mar 2007
32991 posts
Posted on 7/14/26 at 10:32 am to
Posted by boosiebadazz
Member since Feb 2008
86170 posts
Posted on 7/14/26 at 10:32 am to
Clown world honk honk

*but with piracy
This post was edited on 7/14/26 at 10:33 am
Posted by Byron Bojangles III
Member since Nov 2012
52665 posts
Posted on 7/14/26 at 10:34 am to
It's TACO Tuesday already?

Just like clockwork

Trump backs away from threat to charge tolls in the Strait of Hormuz
Posted by Timeoday
Easter Island
Member since Aug 2020
24926 posts
Posted on 7/14/26 at 10:35 am to
quote:

I sure hope some 3D chess move like that is involved but I fear this is just an admission that the US is in for the long haul with Iran. More trying not to break the military budget because they expect to be there a long while. I hope I’m wrong but that is what I see.


Maybe POTUS Trump wants the international community to lash out and say "you can not do that" so that Iran, Oman and any other country who wishes to do the same hear loud and clear.
Posted by atlgamecockman
Nola
Member since Dec 2012
4545 posts
Posted on 7/14/26 at 12:03 pm to

God damn maga, are your backs ok from flip flopping so much?
This post was edited on 7/14/26 at 12:05 pm
Posted by JimEverett
Member since May 2020
2557 posts
Posted on 7/14/26 at 12:22 pm to
quote:

We’ll talk was around a week or two ago the Hegseth, Rubio, and someone else was talking to Trump trying to get him to finish this already.


Finish what?
Get free movement in the Srait?
Verify no nuclear weapons program?
Some sort of regime change like Venezuela? Or like Iraq 2003?
End support of hamas and hezbollah?

And then how do/did these people propose "finishing" on any of these goals?
Posted by JimEverett
Member since May 2020
2557 posts
Posted on 7/14/26 at 12:31 pm to
Seems like sometbing along these lines was the plan all along. Get a civil war going and make sure it stays contained in Iran. Oil would rise, but it would not be a huge rise that really disrupts the world economy.

Something happened that made them put brakes on that idea. Was it something about our capability like not enough munitions? Or something internal in Iran? Or maybe something told them that the economic risk was too large? Who knows, but it did seem like there was a strategic change.
Posted by Modern
Fiddy Men
Member since May 2011
17020 posts
Posted on 7/14/26 at 1:02 pm to
Taco Tuesday bro!
Posted by teke184
Zachary, LA
Member since Jan 2007
104961 posts
Posted on 7/14/26 at 1:06 pm to
If it heavily depresses the insurance charged by Lloyds and other carriers, various shippers may be OK with this.

Right now, insurance coverage for those freighters is out of whack.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram